Simulation-based planning for planetary rover experiments

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 1049-1058

  Joslin, David ^a   Frank, Jeremy ^b   Jónsson, Ari K ^b   Smith, David E ^b  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MANNED SPACE FLIGHT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CURRENT IMPLEMENTATION; PLANETARY ROVERS; PLANNING ALGORITHMS; UTILITY METRICS;

PLANETARY SURFACE ANALYSIS;

EID: 33846670300     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2005.1574358     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Barbulescu, L., D. Whitley, and A. Howe. 2004. Leap before you look: An effective strategy in an oversubscribed scheduling problem. In Proc. of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
2. Bresina, J., R. Dearden, N. Meuleau, S. Ramakrishnan, D. Smith, and R. Washington. 2002. Planning under continuous time and resource uncertainty: A challenge for AI. In Proc. of the 18th Conference on uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-02).
3. Bresina, J., A. Jónsson, P. Morris, and K. Rajan. 2005. Mixed-initiative planning in MAPGEN: Capabilities and shortcomings. In Proc. of the ICAPS Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Planning and Scheduling.
4. Frank, J., and A. Jónsson. 2003. Constraint-based attribute and interval planning. Journal of Constraints Special Issue on Constraints and Planning 8 (4): 339-364.
5. Frank, J., and E. Kürklü. 2005. Mixed discrete and continuous algorithms for scheduling airborne astronomy observations. In Proc. of the 2nd Intl. Conference on Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Operations Research.
6. Ghallab, M., D. Nau, and P. Traverso. 2004. Automated planning: Theory and practice. Morgan Kaufmann.
7. Globus, A., J. Crawford, J. Lohn, and A. Pryor. 2004. A comparison of techniques for scheduling earth observing satellites. In Proc. of the 16th Conference on the Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence.
8. Gough, J., M. Fox, and D. Long. 2004. Plan execution under resource consumption uncertainty. In Proc. of the Workshop on Connecting Planning Theory with Practice at 13th Intl. Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS'04), 24-29.
9. Joslin, D., and D. E. Smith. 2005. Squeaky-Wheel Optimization for planetary rover experiment planning. In Proc. of the Intelligent Systems and Agents 2005 Conference (ISA2005).
10. Joslin, D. E., and D. P. Clements. 1998. Squeaky Wheel Optimization. In Proc. of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), Madison, WI, 340-346.
11. JPL. 2004. Slip sliding away. Available via 〈http: //marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/spotlight/opportunity/b20_20040309.html〉.
12. Meuleau, N., and D. Smith. 2003. Optimal limited contingency planning. In Proc. of the 19th Conf. on uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-03).
13. Musselman, K., J. O'Reilly, and S. Duket. 2002. The role of simulation in advanced planning and scheduling. In Proc. of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. E. Yücesan, C. Chen, J. Snowdon, and J. Charnes, 1825-1830. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
14. Smith, D. 2004. Choosing objectives in over-subscription planning. In Proc. of the 14th Intl. Conf. on Automated Planning and Scheduling.
15. Smith, T., and J. Pyle. 2004. An effective algorithm for project scheduling with arbitrary temporal constraints. In Proc. of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
16. Syswerda, G. 1994. Generation of schedules using a genetic procedure. U.S. Patent number 5,319,781.