A case study of model context for simulation composability and reusability

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 437-444

  Spiegel, Michael ^a   Reynolds Jr , Paul F ^a   Brogan, David C ^a  

^a University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REUSABILITY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPOSABILITY; SIMULATION COMPOSITION; VALIDATION CONSTRAINTS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 33846663360     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2005.1574279     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bartholet, R., D.C. Brogan, P.F. Reynolds, and J.C. Carnahan 2004. In search of the philosopher's stone: Simulation composability versus component-based software design. In Proceedings of the Fall 2004 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL.
2. Carnahan, J.C., D.C. Brogan and P.F. Reynolds. Simulation-specific characteristics. Submitted for publication.
3. Chow, C. 1979. Introduction to computational fluid mechanics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
4. Davis, P.K. and R.H. Anderson 2003. Improving the composability of Department of Defense models and simulations, Rand Corporation Report. http://www.rand.org/publications/MG/MG101/.
5. Garlan, D., R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom 1995. Architectural mismatch or why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Software Engineering. Seattle WA.
6. th Annual NASA Goddard Software Engineering Workshop. Greenbelt, MD
7. th Annual NASA Goddard Software Engineering Workshop. Greenbelt, MD
8. Kasputis, S. and H.C. Ng 2000. Composable simulations. In Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. J.A. Joines, R.R. Barton, K. Kang, and P.A. Fishwick, 1577-1584.
9. Lutz, R. R. 1993. Analyzing software requirements errors in safety-critical, embedded systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
10. Malak, R. J., and C.J.J. Paradis 2004. Foundations of validating reusable behavioral models in engineering design problems. In Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. R.G. Ingalis, M.D. Rossetti, J.S. Smith, and B.A. Peters, 420-428. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
11. Page, E.H. and J.M. Opper 1999. Observations on the complexity of composable simulation. In Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. P.A. Farrington, H.B. Nembhard, D.T. Sturrock, and G.W. Evans, 553-560. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
12. Petty, M.D. and E.W. Weisel 2003a. A composability lexicon. In Proceedings of the Spring 2003 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 181-187. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization.
13. Petty, M.D. and E.W. Weisel 2003b. A formal basis for a theory of semantic composability. In Proceedings of the Spring 2003 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 416-423. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization.
14. Shaughnessy, E.J., I.M. Katz, and J.P. Schaffer. 2005. Introduction to fluid mechanics. New York: Oxford English Press.
15. Sullivan, K.J. and J.C. Knight 1996. Experience assessing an architectural approach to large-scale, systematic reuse. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE18), 220-229. Berlin, Germany, March 25-29.
16. Yam, P. September 2004. Everyday Einstein. Scientific American, 50-55.
17. Yilmatz, L. 2004. On the need for contextualized introspective models to improve reuse and composability of defense simulations. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation 1 (3): 141-151.
18. nd Edition. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.