Effects of Bacillus FS-3 on growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plants and availability of phosphorus in soil

Plant, Soil and Environment

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 58-64

  Turan, M ^a   Ataoglu N ^a   Sahin F ^b  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Phosphorus availability; Phosphorus solubilizing bacterium; Rock phosphate; Tomato

Indexed keywords

BACILLUS (BACTERIUM); BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 33846660147     PISSN: 12141178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/2297-pse     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. th ed. AOAC-Int. Arlington, VA.
2. Araujo M.S.B., Salcedo I.H., Sampaio E.V.S.B. (1993): Efeito de fertilizacoes fosfatadas anuais em solos cultivados com cana-de-acucar: I. Intensidade e formas de acumulacao. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo, Campinas, 17: 389-396.
3. Bashan Y., Holguin G., de-Bashan L.E. (2004): Azospirillum-plant relationships: physical, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances. Can. J. Microbiol., 50: 521-577.
4. Betrand H., Nalin R., Bally R., Cleyet-Marel J.C. (2001): Isolation and identification of the most efficient plant growth-promoting bacterium associated with canola (Brassica nopus). Biol. Fertil. Soils, 33: 152-156.
5. Bhattacharya P., Dey B.K., Banik S., Nath S. (1986): Organic manures in relation to rhizosphere effect. Effect of organic manures on phosphate solubilizing power of rice and succession wheat rhizosphere soils. Zbl. Mikrobiol., 141: 357-365.
6. 2-fixing bacterial inoculation on yield of sugar beet and barley. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 164: 527-531.
7. Crews T.E. (1996): The supply of phosphorus from native, inorganic phosphorus pools in continuously cultivated Mexican agroecosystems. Agr. Ecosys. Environ., 57: 197-208.
8. nd ed. Agronomy, No. 9: 383-441.
9. Hedley M.J., Stewart J.W.B., Chauhan B.S. (1982a): Changes in inorganic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46: 970-976.
10. Hedley M.J., White R.E., Nye P.M. (1982b): Plant-induced changes in the rhizosphere of rape (Brassica napus var. emerald) seedlings: 3. Changes in L value, soil phosphate fractions and phosphates activity. New Phytol., 91: 45-56.
11. Kucey R.M.N., Janzen H.H., Leggett M.E. (1989): Microbial mediated increases in plant available phosphorus. Adv. Agron., 42: 199-228.
12. nd ed. Agronomy, No. 9: 199-224.
13. Mehta S., Nautiyal C.S. (2001): An efficient method for qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Curr. Microbiol., 43: 51-56.
14. Puente M.E., Li C.Y., Bashan Y. (2004): Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock-weathering desert plants. II. Growth promotion of cactus seedlings. Plant Biol., 6: 643-650.
15. Rodriquez H., Fraga R. (1999): Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv., 17: 319-339.
16. Roychoudhury P., Kaushik B.D. (1989): Solubilization of Mussorie rock phosphate by cyanobacteria. Curr. Sci., 58: 569-570.
17. 2-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant Soil, 265: 123-129.
18. SAS Institute (1982): SAS Users Guide. SAS Inst., Cary, N.C.
19. Shen J., Li R., Zhang F., Fan J., Tang C., Rengel Z. (2004): Crop yields, soil fertility and phosphorus fractions in response to long-term fertilization under rice monoculture system on a calcareous soil. Field Crop Res., 86: 225-238.
20. th ed. SMSS Techn. Monogr. No. 19, Blacksburg. Pocahontas Press. Inc.
21. Sundara B., Natarajam V., Hari K. (2002): Influence of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the changes in soil available phosphorus and sugarcane and sugar yields. Field Crops Res., 77: 43-49.
22. Tiessen H., Salcedo I.H., Sampaio E.V.S.B. (1992): Nutrient and soil organic matter dynamics under shifting cultivation in semi-arid north-eastern Brazil. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 38: 139-151.
23. Turan M., Ataoglu N., Sahin F. (2006): Evaluation of the capacity of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and fungi on different forms of phosphorus in liquid culture. J. Sustain. Agr., 28: 99-109.