Asian social psychology: Looking in and looking out

Asian Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 22-31

  Ward, Colleen ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Asian social psychology; Indigenous psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846658313     PISSN: 13672223     EISSN: 1467839X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00207.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bond, M. H. (1988). Introduction. In: M. H. Bond, ed. The Cross-Cultural Challenge to Social Psychology, pp. 9-13. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Bond, R. A. & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using the Asch line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.
3. Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A. et al. (2004). Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 548-570.
4. Brouwers, S. A., Van Hemert, D. A., Breugelmans, S. M. & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2004). A historical analysis of empirical studies published in the Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 251-262.
5. Chang, W. C., Chua, W. L. & Toh, Y. (1997). The concept of psychological control in the Asian context. In: K. Leung, U. Kim, S. Yamaguchi & Y. Kashima, eds. Progress in Asian Social Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 95-118. Singapore: John Wiley.
6. Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W., Zhang, J. X. & Zhang, J. P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181-199.
7. Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J., et al. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the five factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407-433.
8. Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Leung, K., Ward, C. & Leong, F. (2003). The English version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 433-452.
9. Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 18, 143-164.
10. Choi, S.-C., Kim, U. & Kim, D.-I. D. (1997). Multi-faceted analyses of chemyon ('social face'): An indigenous Korean perspective. In: K. Leung, U. Kim, S. Yamaguchi & Y. Kashima, eds. Progress in Asian Social Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 3-22. Singapore: John Wiley.
11. Church, A. T. & Katigbak, M. S. (2000). Filipino Personality; Indigenous and Cross-Cultural Studies. Manila: De La Salle University Press.
12. Doi, T. (1973). The Anatomy of Dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha.
13. Enriquez, V. G. (1990a). Towards a liberation psychology. In: V. G. Enriquez, ed. Indigenous Psychology: A Book of Readings, pp. 123-136. Quezon City, the Philippines: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
14. Enriquez, V. G. (1990b). Cross-indigenous methods and perspectives. In: V. G. Enriquez, ed. Indigenous Psychology: A Book of Readings, pp. 210-230. Quezon City, the Philippines: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
15. Enriquez, V. G. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In: U. Kim & J. W. Berry, eds. Indigenous Psychologies: Research and Experience in Cultural Context, pp. 152-169. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Fletcher, G. J. O. & Ward, C. (1988). Attribution theory and processes: A cross-cultural perspective. In: M. H. Bond, ed. The Cross-Cultural Challenge to Social Psychology, pp. 230-244. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Heine, S. J. & Lehman, S. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self enhancement: Examination of group serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 12681283.
18. Ho, D. F. Y. (1990). Asian psychology: An East-West Dialogue on Indigenization. In: V. G. Enriquez, ed. Indigenous Psychology: A Book of Readings, pp. 137-172. Quezon City, the Philippines: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
19. Ho, S. W., Munro, D. & Carr, S. C. (1997). Kiasuism across cultures: Singapore and Australia. In: J. C. Lasry, J. G. Adair & K. L. Dion, eds. Latest Contributions to Cross-Cultural Psychology, pp. 212-227. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
20. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Hofstede, G. (2007). A European in Asia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 16-21.
22. Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974.
23. Kashima, Y. & Triandis, H. C. (1986). The self-serving bias in attributions as a coping strategy: Across-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 83-97.
24. Kim, U. (2000). Outgoing editor's preface. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, i-ii.
25. Kim, U. & Berry, J. W., eds. (1993). Indigenous Psychologies: Research and Experience in Cultural Context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Kudo, E. & Numazaki, M. (2003). Explicit and direct self-serving bias in Japan: Re-examination of self-serving bias for success and failure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 511-521.
27. Kurman, J. (2003). Why is self-enhancement low in certain collectivist cultures? An investigation of competing explanations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 496-510.
28. Leung, K. (2000). Incoming editor's preface. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, iii-iv.
29. Leung, K. (2007). Asian social psychology: Achievements, threats, and opportunities. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 8-15.
30. Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., et al. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286-302.
31. Lin, E. J.-L. & Church, A. T. (2004). Are indigenous Chinese personality dimensions culture specific? An investigation of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory in Chinese American and European American samples. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 35, 586-605.
32. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr & Yik, M. S. M. (1996). Universal aspects of the Chinese personality structure. In: M. H. Bond, ed. The Handbook of Chinese Psychology, pp. 189-207. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
33. Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
34. Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental and cultural differences in self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711-747.
35. Misra, G., ed. (1990). Applied Social Psychology in India. New Delhi: Sage.
36. Muramoto, Y. (2003). An indirect self-enhancement in relationship among Japanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 552-567.
37. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently and Why. New York: The Free Press.
38. Ortega, S. & Guanzon-Lapena, M. A. (1997). Locally Developed Psychological Tests: A Critical Review. Paper presented at the 19th annual scientific meeting of the National Academy of Science and Technology, Bicutan, Manila.
39. Pandey, J. (2004). Psychology in India Revisited: Developments in the Discipline. New Delhi: Sage.
40. Pe-Pua, R. (1990). Pagtatanong-tanong: A method for crosscultural research. In: V. G. Enriquez, ed. Indigenous Psychology: A Book of Readings, pp. 231-249. Quezon City, the Philippines: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
41. Schwartz, S. (1992). The universal content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: M. P. Zanna, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 1-65. New York: Academic Press.
42. Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L. & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pan-cultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60-79.
43. Sinha, D. (1982). What is relevant in cross-cultural psychology? In: R. Rath, H. S. Asthana, D. Sinha & J. B. H. Sinha, eds. Diversity and Unity in Cross-Cultural Psychology, pp. 352359. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
44. Sinha, D. (1993). Indigenization of psychology in India and its relevance. In: U. Kim & J. W. Berry, eds. Indigenous Psychologies: Research and Experience in Cultural Context, pp. 30-43. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Sinha, D. & Kao, H. S. R. (1988). Social Values and Development: Asian Perspectives. New Delhi: Sage.
46. Smith, P. B. & Bond, M. H. (1998). Social Psychology Across Cultures, 2nd edn. London: Prentice Hall.
47. Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Kennard, B. D., Ho, L. M. & Zaman, R. M. (2002). Does the Chinese construct of guan export to the West? International Journal of Psychology, 37, 74-82.
48. Ting-Toomey, S. (2004). Translating conflict face-negotiation theory into practice. In: D. Landis, J. M. Bennett & M. J. Bennett, eds. Handbook of Intercultural Training, 3rd edn, pp. 219-248. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Ting-Toomey, S., Gao, G., Trubisky, P., et al. (1991). Culture, face maintenance and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study in five cultures. Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 275-296.
50. Wang, D., Hong, C. & Zhou. C. (2005). Measuring the personality of Chinese: QZPS versus NEO PI-R. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 97-122.
51. Yamaguchi, S. (2004). Further clarifications of the concept of amae in relation to dependence and attachment. Human Development, 47, 28-33.
52. Yu, A.-B. (1996). Ultimate life concerns, self and Chinese achievement motivation. In: M. H. Bond, ed. The Handbook of Chinese Psychology, pp. 247-262. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.