The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promises and challenges

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 307-330

  Lee, Young Ju ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized writing assessments; ESL writing assessments; Process oriented writing; Revision process

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846657735     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. In: Belanoff P., and Dickson M. (Eds). Portfolios: Process and product (1991), Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, NJ
2. Bridwell L., Brooke R., and Sirc G. Revising and computing: Case studies of student writers. In: Freedman S.W. (Ed). The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (1989), Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey 172-193
3. Callahan S. Tests worth taking?: Using portfolios for accountability in Kentucky. Research in the Teaching of English 31 (1997) 295-336
4. Camp R. The place of portfolios in our changing views of writing assessment. In: Bennett R.E., and Ward W.C. (Eds). Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 183-212
5. Cho, Y. (2001). Examining a process-oriented writing assessment in a large-scale ESL testing context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
6. Freedman S.W. Linking large-scale testing and classroom portfolio assessments of student writing. Educational Assessment 1 (1993) 27-52
7. Goldberg G.L., Roswell B.S., and Michaels H. Can assessment mirror instruction? A look at peer response and revision in a large-scale writing test. Educational Assessment 3 (1995) 287-314
8. Hinkel E. Second language writers' text: Linguistic and rhetorical features (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
9. Kim, M. (2002). Process and product: An investigation of the writing on non-native speakers of English on a computer-based academic English writing test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California at Los Angeles.
10. Lee, H.-K. (2002). A comparative study of ESL writers' performance in a paper-based and a computer-delivered writing test. Unpublished master's thesis equivalent paper. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
11. Polio C. Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning 47 (1997) 101-143
12. Prior P. Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
13. Pyo, K. (2001). Construct validation of an integrated-approach EAP placement test using multi-group structural equation modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
14. Susser B. Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 3 (1994) 31-47
15. Wiggins G. The constant danger of sacrificing validity to reliability: Making writing assessment serve writers. Assessing Writing 1 (1994) 129-139
16. Zhu W. Effects of training for peer response on students' comments and interaction. Written Communication 12 (1995) 492-528