Lung cancer: Computerized quantification of tumor response - Initial results

Radiology

Volumn 241, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 892-898

  Zhao, Binsheng ^a   Schwartz, Lawrence H ^a   Moskowitz, Chaya S ^a   Ginsberg, Michelle S ^a   Rizvi, Naiyer A ^a   Kris, Mark G ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEFITINIB;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 33846651571     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413051887     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. World Health Organization. WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Offset publication no. 48. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1979.
2. Miller AB, Hogestraeten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981;47:207-214.
3. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205-216.
4. Thiesse P, Ollivier L, Di Stefano-Louineau D, et al. Response rate accuracy in oncology trial: reasons for interobserver variability. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:3507-3514.
5. Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Van Slyke MA, et al. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:851-854.
6. Lavin PT, Flowerdew G. Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumors. Cancer 1980;46:1286-1290.
7. Belton AL, Saini S, Lieberman K, et al. Tumor size measurement in an oncology clinical trial: comparison between off-site and on-site measurements. Clin Radiol 2003;58:311-314.
8. Schwartz LH, Ginsberg MS, DeCorato D, et al. Evaluation of tumor measurements in oncology: use of film-based and electronic techniques. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2179-2184.
9. Kalaigian J, Bidaut L, Zhao B, et al. Design and implementation of a flexible PACS interface for clinical research applications [abstr]. Radiology 2002;225(P):768.
10. Kalaigian JP, Schwartz LH, Kijewski PK, et al. Design and implementation of a targeted PACS infrastructure for clinical research [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2004; 826.
11. Zhao B, Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Henschke CI. Two-dimensional segmentation of pulmonary nodules on helical CT images. Med Phys 1999;26:889-895.
12. Zhao B, Reeves AP, Yankelevitz D, Henschke CI. Three-dimensional multi-criterion automatic segmentation of pulmonary nodules of helical CT images. Opt Eng 1999;38:1340-1347.
13. Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Lefkowitz RA, Wang L. Measuring tumor burden: comparison of automatic and manual techniques. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick J, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2004-image processing. Vol 5370. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2004; 1695-1700.
14. Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Moskowita CS, et al. Pulmonary metastases: effect of CT section thickness on measurement-initial experience. Radiology 2005;234:934-939.
15. Zhao B, Gamsu G, Ginsberg MS, Jiang L, Schwartz LH. Automated detection of small lung nodules on CT utilizing a local density maximum algorithm. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2003;4:248-260.
16. James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: undimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91(6):523-528.
17. Husband JE, Schwartz LH, Spencer J, et al. Evaluation of the response to treatment of soud tumors: a consensus statement of the International Cancer imaging Society. Br J Cancer 2004;90:2256-2260.
18. Mazumdar M, Smith A, Schwartz LH. A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:358-365.