Just how pluralist is direct democracy? The structure of interest group participation in ballot proposition elections

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 557-568

  Bowler, Shaun ^a   Hanneman, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846643639     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900405     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ainsworth, Scott. 2002. Analyzing Interest Groups: Group Influence on People and Politics. London: Norton.
2. Boehmke, Frederick. 2005. The Indirect Effect of Direct Democracy: How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
3. Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. 1998. Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Broder, David. 2000. Democracy Derailed: Ballot Proposition Campaigns and the Power of Money. Harvest books.
5. De Figueiredo, John. 2005. "How much Does Money Matter in a Direct Democracy?" Southern California Law Review 78: 1065-73.
6. Donovan, T., Shaun Bowler, David McCuan, and Kenneth Fernandez. 1998. "Contending Players and Strategies: Opposition Advantages in Ballot Proposition Elections." In T. Donovan and C. Tolbert, eds., Citizens as Legislators. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
7. Gerber, E. 1999. The Populist Paradox. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. _. The Populist Paradox. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Gerber, E., Zoltan L. Hajnal, and Hugh Louch. 2002. "Minorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections" Journal of Politics 64 (1): 154-77.
10. Hasen, R. 2005. "Rethinking the Unconstitutionality of Contribution and Expenditure Limits in Ballot Measure Campaigns." Southern California Law Review 78: 885-926.
11. Laumann, E., and Knoke, D. 1980. The Organizational State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Logan, J. R., and H. L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Lowrie, S. Gale. 1911. "New Forms of the Initiative and Referendum." American Political Science Review 5 (4): 566-73.
14. Lupia, Arthur. 1994. "Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections." American Political Science Review 88: 63-76.
15. Magleby, David B. 1984. Direct legislation; Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Malchow, Hal. 2001. TV vs. Direct mail: Campaign Cost Comparison - Statistical Data Included, pp. 1-7. Washington, DC: Campaigns & Elections Magazine Press
17. Manweller, M. 2005. "Coalition Building in Direct Democracy Campaigns." American Politics Research 33 (2): 246-82.
18. Matsusaka, John. 2005. "Direct Democracy Works" Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2): 185-206.
19. Milyo, Jeffrey, D. Primo, and T. Groseclose. 2000. "Corporate PAC Campaign Contributions in Perspective." Business and Politics 2 (1): 75-88.
20. Press, W. H., B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling. 1989. Numerical Recipes in Pascal. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Schrag, P. 2004. Paradise Lost: California's Experience, America's Future. Berkeley: University of California Press
22. Smith, Daniel A. 1998. Tax Crusaders and the Politics of Direct Democracy. NY: Routledge.
23. _. 2001. "Campaign Financing of Ballot Propositions in the American States." In L. H. Ernst Sabato and B. Larson, eds., Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Ballot Propositions in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24. Smith, D., and Tolbert, C. 2004. Educated by Ballot Proposition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
25. _. 2001. "The Ballot Proposition to Party: Partisanship and Ballot Initiatives in California." Party Politics 7: 739-57.
26. _. 2005. Educated by Ballot Proposition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27. Stratmann, Thomas. 2005. "The Effectiveness of Money in Ballot Measure Campaigns." Southern California Law Review 78 (4): 1041-64
28. Weisstein., E. W. 1999. "Singular Value Decomposition." In MathWorld - A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ SingularValueDecomposition.html.
29. Wright J. 1996. Interest groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions and Influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.