Somatic modulation of tinnitus: Test reliability and results after repetitive muscle contraction training

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 30-35

  Sanchez, Tanit Ganz ^a,b   Da Silva Lima, Adriana ^a   Brandão, Ana Laura ^a   Lorenzi, Maria Cecília ^a   Bento, Ricardo Ferreira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Auditory connection; Rehabilitation; Somatic modulation; Somatosensory system; Tinnitus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MODULATION; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NECK MUSCLE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPEAT PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TINNITUS;

EID: 33846604067     PISSN: 00034894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000348940711600106     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sanchez TG, Bento TG, Miniti A, Câmara J. Zumbido: características e epidemiologia. Experiência do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 1997;63:229-35.
2. Levine RA. Somatic modulation appears to be fundamental attribute of tinnitus. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar, Cambridge, England, 1999:193-7.
3. Sanchez TG, Guerra GCY, Lorenzi MC, Brandão AL, Bento RF. The influence of voluntary muscle contractions upon the onset and modulation of tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 2002;7:370-5.
4. Wright DD, Ryugo DK. Mossy fiber projections from the cuneate nucleus to the cochlear nucleus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1996;365:159-72.
5. Shore SE, El Kashlan H, Lu J. Effects of trigeminal ganglion stimulation on unit activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. Neuroscience 2003;119:1085-101.
6. Moller AR, Moller MB, Jannetta PJ, Jho HD. Compound action potentials recorded from the exposed eighth nerve in patients with intractable tinnitus. Laryngoscope 1992;102:187-97.
7. Sanchez TG, Bittar RSM, Zonato AY, Bento RF. Controvérsias sobre a fisiopatologia do zumbido. Arq Fund Otorrinolaringol 1997;1:2-8.
8. Levine RA. Somatic (craniocervical) tinnitus and the dorsal cochlear nucleus hypothesis. Am J Otolaryngol 1999;20:351-62.
9. Abel MD, Levine RA. Muscle contractions and auditory perception in tinnitus patients and nonclinical subjects. Cranio 2004;22:181-91.
10. Lockwood AH, Salvi RJ, Coad ML, Towsley ML, Wack DS, Murphy BW. The functional neuroanatomy of tinnitus: evidence for limbic system links and neural plasticity. Neurology 1998;50:114-20.
11. Cacace AT. Expanding the biological basis of tinnitus: crossmodal origins and the role of neuroplasticity. Hear Res 2003;175:112-32.
12. Kandel ER. Nerve cells and behavior. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM, eds. Principles of neural science. 4th ed. Norwalk, Conn: McGraw-Hill, 2000:18-32.
13. Thompson RF, Smith HE, Bliss D. Auditory, somatic sensory, and visual response interactions and interrelations in association and primary cortical fields of the cat. J Neurophysiol 1963;26:365-78.
14. Hotta T, Kameda K. Interactions between somatic and visual or auditory responses in the thalamus of the cat. Exp Neurol 1963;8:1-13.
15. Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990;8:221-54.
16. Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) as a method for treatment of tinnitus and hyperacusis patients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:162-77.
17. Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Tinnitus and hyperacusis. In: Ballenger JJ, Snow JB, eds. Ballenger's otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery. San Diego, Calif: Singular Publishing, 2002:456-71.