Processing speed in recurrent visual networks correlates with general intelligence

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-43

  Jolij, Jacob ^a,d,e   Huisman, Danielle ^a   Scholte, Steven ^a   Hamel, Ronald ^a   Kemner, Chantal ^c   Lamme, Victor A F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCE   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d EPFL   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Intelligence; Recurrent processing; Scene segmentation; Visual processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846582844     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000236863.46952.a6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kranzler JH, Jensen AR. Inspection time and intelligence: a meta-analysis. Intelligence 1989; 13:329-347.
2. Deary IJ, Caryl PG. Neuroscience and human intelligence differences. Trends Neurosci 1997; 20:365-371.
3. Salin PA, Bullier J. Corticocortical connections in the visual system: structure and function. Physiol Rev 1995; 75:105-154.
4. Lamme VAF, Roelfsema PR. The different modes of vision offered by feedforward and feedback processing. Trends Neurosci 2000; 23:571-579.
5. VanRullen R, Koch C. Visual selective behavior can be triggered by a feedforward process. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15:209-217.
6. Lamme VAF, Supèr H, Landman R, Roelfsema PR, Spekreijse H. The role of primary visual cortex (V1) in visual awareness. Vis Res 2000; 40:1507-1521.
7. Supèr H. Cognitive processing in the primary visual cortex: from perception to memory. Rev Neurosci 2002; 13:287-298.
8. Lamme VAF, Van Dijk BW, Spekreijse H. Texture segregation is processed by primary visual cortex in man and monkey. Evidence from VEP experiments. Vis Res 1992; 32:797-807.
9. Bach M, Meigen T. Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential. Vis Res 1992; 32:417-424.
10. Caputo G, Casco C. A visual evoked potential correlate of global figure-ground segmentation. Vis Res 1999; 39:1597-1610.
11. Lamme VAF, Supèr H, Spekreijse H. Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998; 8:529-535.
12. Hupé JM, James AC, Payne BR, Lomber SG, Girard P, Bullier J. Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2, and V3 neurons. Nature 1998; 394:784-787.
13. Scholte HS, Jolij J, Lamme VAF. The cortical processing dynamics of edge detection and scene segmentation. In: Breitmeyer B, Ogmen H, editors. The first half second: the microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2006. pp. 73-89.
14. Heinen K, Jolij J, Lamme VAF. Figure-ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport 2005; 16:1483-1487.
15. Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH. Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press; 1998.
16. Hamel R, Schmittmann VD. The 20 minutes version as a predictor of The Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Educ Psychol Meas (in press).
17. Scholte HS. Scene segmentation. PhD thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 2003.
18. Nieuwenhuis S, Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol Bull 2005; 131:510-532.
19. Enns JT, Di Lollo V. What's new in visual masking? Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4:345-352.
20. Lamme VAF, Zipser K, Spekreijse H. Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. J Cogn Neurosci 2002; 14:1044-1053.
21. Luciano M, Posthuma D, Wright MJ, de Geus EJ, Smith GA, Geffen GM, et al. Perceptual speed does not cause intelligence, and intelligence does not cause perceptual speed. Biol Psychol 2005; 70:1-8.
22. Scholte HS, Witteveen SC, Spekreijse H, Lamme VAF. The influence of inattention of neural correlates of scene segmentation. Brain Res 2006; 1076:106-115.
23. Schubo A, Meinecke C, Schroger E. Automaticity and attention: investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2001; 11:341-361.
24. Coull JT. Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol 1998; 55:343-361.
25. Posthuma D, De Geus EJ, Boomsma DI. Perceptual speed and IQ are associated through common genetic factors. Behav Genet 2001; 31:593-602.