Efficient Hidden Semi-Markov Model inference for structured video sequences

Proceedings - 2nd Joint IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance, VS-PETS

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 247-254

  Tweed, David ^a   Fisher, Robert ^a   Bins, José ^a   List, Thor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Activity recognition; Computer vision; Hidden Markov models; Video behaviour analysis

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; HIDDEN SEMI-MARKOV MODELS; VIDEO BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEMANTICS;

VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 33846569481     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VSPETS.2005.1570922     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. R E Bellman, Dynamic Programming, Princeton, NJ, 1957.
2. C Bishop. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. OUP, 1995.
3. M Brand. Understanding manipulation in video, In Proc AFGR, pages 96-99, 1996.
4. M Brand, N Oliver, and A P Pentland. Coupled Hidden Markov Models for complex action recognition. In Comp. Vis. and Pattern Recog., Los Alamitos, 1997.
5. I Bronshtein, K Semendyayev, G Musiol, and H Muehlig. Handbook of Mathematics. Springer, 2003.
6. J L Crowley and P Reignier. Dynamic composition of process federations for context aware perception of human activity. In Int Conf on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, 2003.
7. D Eppstein, Sequence comparison with mixed convex and concave costs. J. Algorithms, pages 85-101, 1990.
8. J Ferguson. Variable duration models for speech. In Proc. Symp. on the Application of HMMs to Text and Speech, pages 143-179, 1980.
9. Fisher et al. homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/ CAVIAR, 2004.
10. A Galata, A Cohn, D Magee, and D Hogg. Modeling interaction using learnt qualitative spatio-temporal relations and variable length markov models. In Proc Euro. Conf on Artificial Intelligence, Lyon, 2002.
11. Z Galil and K Park. Dynamic programming with convexity, concavity and sparsity. Technical report, CUCS-066-90, Dept Comp. Sci, Columbia Univ., 1990.
12. Xianping Ge. Segmental Semi-Markov Models and Applications to Sequence Analysis. PhD thesis, Dept Comp Sci, Uni. California, Irvine, 2002.
13. S Hongeng, R Nevatia, and F Bremond. Video-based event recognition: activity representation and probabilistic methods. Comp. Vis. and Image Understanding, 96(129-162), 2004.
14. Y Ivanov and A Bobick. Recognition of visual activities and interactions by stochastic parsing. PAMI, 20(8):852-872, 2000.
15. M Johnson. Capacity and complexity of HMM duration modelling techniques. IEEE Sig Proc Letters, 12(5), 2005.
16. D Minnen, I Essa, and T Starner. Expectation grammars: Leveraging high-level expectations for activity recognition. In IEEE Int Conf on CVPR, Madison, 2003.
17. C Mitchell, M Harper, and L Jamieson. On the complexity of Explicit Duration HMMs. IEEE Trans on Speech and Audio Processing, 3(3), 1995.
18. N Oliver, E Horvitz, and A Garg. Layer representations for human activity recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, (9): 163-180, 2004.
19. L Rabiner and B Juang. An introduction to hidden Markov models. IEEE ASSP Magazine, pages 4-16, 1986.
20. N Rea, R Dahyot, and A Kokaram. Semantic event detection in sports through motion understanding. In Int Conf on Image and Video Retrieval, Dublin, 2004.
21. N Rota and M Thonnat. Video sequence interpretation for visual surveillance. In Int Workshop on Visual Surveillance, Dublin, 2000.
22. D Phung T Duong, H Bui and S Venkatesh. Activitiy recognition and abnormality detection with the switching Hidden Semi-Markov Model. In Int. Conf. on Comp. Vis. & Pat. Recog, 2005.
23. S-Z Yu and H Kobayashi. An efficient forward-backward algorithm for an explicit duration Hidden Markov Model. IEEE Sig Proc Letters, 10(1), 2003.