Solvent-responsive metalloporphyrins: Binding and catalysis

Organometallics

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 358-364

  Zhou, Yibo ^a   Ryu, Eui Hyun ^a   Zhao, Yan ^a   Woo, L Keith ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATED INTRAMOLECULARLY; CHOLATES; LIGAND BINDING; METALLOPORPHYRINS;

AGGLOMERATION; BINDING ENERGY; CATALYSIS; DERIVATIVES; HYDROPHOBICITY; MICELLES;

ORGANOMETALLICS;

EID: 33846565409     PISSN: 02767333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/om060791z     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. (a) Koshland, D. E., Jr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1958, 44, 98-104.
2. (b) Koshland, D. E., Jr. Nature Med. 1998, 4, 1112-1114.
3. (a) Perutz, M. F. Mechanisms of Cooperatively and Allosteric Regulation in Proteins; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1990.
4. (b) Hervé, G., Ed. Allosteric Enzymes; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1989.
5. (c) Kvamme, E.; Pihl, A. Eds. Regulation of Enzyme Activity and Allosteric Interactions; Academic Press: New York, 1968.
6. For some recent examples of synthetic allosteric catalysts, see: (a) Kovbasyuk, L.; Krämer, R. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3161-3188 and references therein,
7. (b) Zhu, L; Anslyn, E. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1190-1196.
8. (c) Fritsky, I. O.; Ott, R.; Krämer, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3255-3258.
9. (d) Tozawa, T.; Tokita, S.; Kubo, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3455-3457.
10. (e) Scarso, A.; Scheffer, S. U.; Gobel, M.; Broxterman, Q. B.; Kaptein, B.; Formaggio, F.; Toniolo, C.; Scrimin, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5144-4149.
11. (f) Gianneschi, N. C.; Bertin, P. A.; Nguyen, S. T.; Mirkin, C. A.; Zakharov, L. N.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10508-10509.
12. (g) Gianneschi, N. C.; Cho, S.-H.; Nguyen, S. T.; Mirkin, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5503-5507.
13. (h) Takebayashi, S.; Ikeda, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Shinkai, S. Chem. Commun. 2004, 420-421.
14. (i) Gianneschi, N. C.; Nguyen, S. T.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1644-1645.
15. For several recent reviews, see: (a) Gellman, S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 173-180.
16. (b) Kirshenbaum, K.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Dill, K. A. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1999, 9, 530-535.
17. (c) Stigers, K. D.; Soth, M. J.; Nowick, J. S. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 714-723.
18. (d) Hill, D. J.; Mio, M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3893-4012.
19. (e) Cubberley, M. S.; Iverson, B. L. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 650-653.
20. (f) Sanford, A. R.; Gong, B. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 1649-1659.
21. (g) Martinek, T. A.; Fulop, F. Eur. J. Biochem. 2003, 270, 3657-3666.
22. (h) Cheng, R. P. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 2004, 14, 512-520.
23. (i) Hue, I. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 17-29.
24. (j) Licini, G.; Prins, L. J.; Scrimin, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 969-977.
25. Zhao, Y.; Zhong, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17894-17901.
26. (a) Zhao, Y.; Zhong, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9988-9989.
27. (b) Zhao, Y.; Zhong, Z. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4715-4717.
28. Ryu, E.-H.; Zhao, Y. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3187-3189.
29. Zhao, Y.; Ryu, E.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7585-7591.
30. Ryu, E.-H.; Yan, J.; Zhong, Z.; Zhao, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7205-7213.
31. For some recent examples of interconvertible unimolecular micelles and reversed micelles, see: (a) Basu, S.; Vutukuri, D. R.; Shyamroy, S.; Sandanaraj, B. S.; Thayumanavan, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9890-9891.
32. (b) Vutukuri, D. R.; Basu, S.; Thayumanavan, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15636-15637.
33. (c) Ghosh, S.; Maitra, U. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 399-402.
34. (a) The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 2000; Vol. 4.
35. (b) Wolf, J. R.; Hamaker, C. G.; Djukic, J.-P.; Kodadek, T.; Woo, L. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9194-9199.
36. (c) Hamaker, C. G.; Djukic, J.-P.; Daniel, A. S.; Woo, L. K. Organometallics 2001, 20, 5189-5199.
37. (d) Hamaker, C, G.; Mirafzal, G. A.; Woo, L. K. Organometallics 2001, 20, 5171-5176.
38. (e) Mirafzal, G. A.; Cheng, G.; Woo, L. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 176-177.
39. Jaquinod, L. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 2000; Vol. 1, Chapter 5, pp 201-238.
40. For another steroid-functionalized porphyrin, see: Groves, J. T.; Neumann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2900-2909.
41. Using local steric and chiral environments to control the selectivity/ activity of metalloporphyrins has been reported; see: (a) Suslick, K. S. In The Porphvrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 2000; Vol. 4, Chapter 28, pp 41-63.
42. (b) Marchon, J.-C.; Ramasseul, R. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 2000; Vol. 11, Chapter 64, pp 75-132.
43. For general procedures for acid-catalyzed synthesis of porphyrins, see: (a) Lindsey, J. S.; Schreiman, C. I.; Hsu, H. C.; Kearney, P. C.; Marguerettaz, A. M. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 827-836.
44. (b) Lindsey, J. S.; Wagner, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 828-836.
45. (c) Wagner, R. W.; Lindsey, J. S. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11097-11112.
46. Sanders, J. K. M.; Bampos, N.; Clyde-Watson, Z.; Darling, S. L.; Hawley, J. C.; Kim, H.-J.; Mak, C. C.; Webb, S. M. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 2000; Vol. 3, Chapter 15, pp 33.
47. 1H NMR spectroscopy indicated that intermolecular aggregation became significant at higher concentrations (ca. 1 mM), especially in low-polarity mixtures (<20% methanol).
48. Fendler, J. H. Membrane Mimetic Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1982; Chapter 3.
49. It should be mentioned that this inherent preference for larger guests by Zn(CFTPP)-as well as the potential hydrogen bonding interaction discussed previously - is also consistent with 8 being a weaker ligand than 7 in polar solvents.
50. The yields given are the averages from three separate experiments. The errors are the standard deviations. See Table 2S in the Supporting Information for the actual yields.
51. 1H NMR spectroscopy. It should be mentioned that any potential intermolecular aggregation of Fe(CFTPP)Cl in low polarity solvents would only reduce the contribution of the reversed micelle-like conformer and decrease the substrate selectivity. Therefore, the observed preference for polar substrates should represent the lower limit achievable by the reversed micelle-like conformer.
52. Bellini, A. M.; Quaglio, M. P.; Guarneri, M.; Cavazzini, G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1983, 18, 185-190.
53. Small discrepancies in the m/z obtained by MALDI-TOFMS were sometimes observed in compounds containing multiple cholates. Similar behavior was reported in the literature; see: Zuluaga, F.; Valderruten, N. E.; Wagener K, B. Polym. Bull. 1999, 42, 41-46.
54. Van Manen, H-J.; Fokkens, R. H.; Van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 18, 3189-3197.
55. (a) Collman, J. P.; Gagne, R. R.; Reed, C. A.; Halbert, T. R.; Lang, G.; Robinson, W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 1427-1439.
56. (b) Kobayashi, H.; Higuchi, T.; Kaizu, Y.; Osada, H.; Aoki, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1975, 48(11), 3137.