Erratum: They probably aren't named Rachel: Young children's scientist identities as emergent multimodel narratives, (Cultural Studies of Science Education 1 DOI: 10.1007/s11422-006-9017-x);"they probably aren't named Rachel": Young children's scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 559-592

  Tucker Raymond, Eli ^a   Varelas, Maria ^a   Pappas, Christine C ^a   Korzh, Alla ^a   Wentland, Ashley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistemologies; Identities; Multimodalities; Narratives; Scientists

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846553632     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-006-9037-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Alters, B.J. ( 1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55.
2. Bakhtin, M.M. ( 1981). In: M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by MM. Bakhtin. Trans. M. Holquist & C. Emerson. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Barton, A.C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children : Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379-394.
4. Brickhouse, N.W., Eisenhart, M.A., & Tonso, K.L. (2006). Forum: Identity politics in science and science education. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 1.
5. Brickhouse, N., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science. Teaching, 37, 441-458.
6. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Chambers, D.W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67, 255-265.
8. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43-63.
9. Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
10. Gee, J.P. (2000-2001). Identity as a lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
11. Gutiérrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445-471.
12. Gutierrez, K.D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits and repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
13. Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
14. Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84, 51-70.
15. Kress, G.R., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
18. Lemke, J.L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In: J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science. London: Routledge.
19. Lemke, J.L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273-290.
20. Lemke, J.L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
21. Lemke, J.L. (2003, April). Identity, development, and desire: Critical questions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. Also available at URL: http://wwwpersonal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/papers/Identity/identity_aera_2003.htm.
22. Lemke, J.L., Kelly, G., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Forum: Toward a phenomenology of interviews. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 83-106.
23. Moje, E.B., Ciechanowski, K.M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and Discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38-70.
24. Pappas, C.C., Varelas, M., Barry, A., & Rife, A. (2003). Dialogic inquiry around information texts: The role of intertextuality in constructing scientific understandings in urban primary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 13, 435-482.
25. Penuel, W.R., & Wertsch, J.V. ( 1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30, 83-92.
26. Roth, W.-M., & Middleton, D. (2006). Knowing what you tell, telling what you know: Uncertainty and asymmetries of meaning in interpreting graphical data. Cultural Studies in Science in Education, I, 11-81.
27. Rudolph, IL. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89, published online, early view.
28. Sandoval, W.A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
29. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
30. Sumrall, W.J. ( 1995). Reasons for the perceived images of scientists by race and gender of students in grades 1-7. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 83-90.
31. Tonso, K.L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 1.
32. Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., & Pappas, C.C. (2006). "What are we? Scientists. What do they do'?": An exploration of discursive identity construction in a third grade science-literacy class. Paper presented at Education and the Public Good: An Interdisciplinary Graduate Conference. Chicago, IL.
33. Wong, D.E. (2002). To appreciate variation between scientists: A perspective for seeing science's vitality. Science Education, 86, 386-400.