The effect of host plant on larval survivorship of the Alaskan swallowtail butterfly (Papilio machaon aliaska)

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 109-115

  Murphy, Shannon M ^a,b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Herbivory; Host race; Host shift; Host plant quality; Larval fitness; Lepidoptera; Papilionidae

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; FITNESS; HOST PLANT; LARVA; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SURVIVORSHIP;

ALASKA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

APIACEAE; APIALES; ARTEMISIA; ARTEMISIA ARCTICA; ASTERACEAE; CNIDIUM; CNIDIUM CNIDIIFOLIUM; LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIO MACHAON; PAPILIONIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA; PETASITES; PETASITES FRIGIDUS;

EID: 33846532941     PISSN: 00138703     EISSN: 15707458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00491.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berenbaum M (1983) Coumarins and caterpillars: a case for coevolution. Evolution 37: 163-179.
2. Bernays EA & Chapman RF (1994) Host Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA.
3. Bush GL (1969) Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23: 237-251.
4. Caillaud MC & Via S (2000) Specialized feeding behavior influences both ecological specialization and assortative mating in sympatric host races of pea aphids. American Naturalist 156: 606-621.
5. Carter M & Feeny P (1985) Techniques for maintaining a culture of the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes asterius Stoll (Papilionidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39: 125-133.
6. Dres M & Mallet J (2002) Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 357: 471-492.
7. Ehrlich PR & Raven PH (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
8. Feder JL, Chilocote CA & Bush GL (1988) Genetic differentiation between sympatric host races of Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature 336: 61-64.
9. Feeny P (1991) Chemical constraints on the evolution of swallowtail butterflies. Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions (ed. by PW Price, TM Lewinsohn, GW Fernandes & WW Benson), pp. 315-340. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, USA.
10. Feeny P, Rosenberry L & Carter M (1983) Chemical aspects of oviposition behavior in butterflies. Herbivorous Insects: Host-Seeking Behavior and Mechanisms (ed. by S Ahmad), pp. 27-76. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
11. Filchak KE, Roethele JB & Feder JL (2000) Natural selection and sympatric divergence in the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature 407: 739-742.
12. Janz N & Nylin S (1997) The role of female search behaviour in determining host plant range in plant feeding insects: a test of the information processing hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264: 701-707.
13. Lederhouse RC (1982) Territorial defense and lek behavior of the black swallowtail butterfly Papilio polyxenes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10: 109-118.
14. Mitter C, Farrell B & Wiegemann B (1988) The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? American Naturalist 132: 107-128.
15. Murphy SM (2004) Enemy-free space maintains swallowtail butterfly host shift. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 18048-18052.
16. Murphy SM (in press) Inconsistent use of host plants by the Alaskan swallowtail butterfly: Adult preference experiments suggest labile oviposition strategy. Ecological Entomology.
17. Neter J, Kutner MH, Bachtsheim CJ & Wasserman W (1996) Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th edn. Irwin, Chicago, IL, USA.
18. Schoonhoven LM, Jermy T & van Loon JJA (1998) Insect-Plant Biology: From Physiology to Evolution. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
19. Scott JA (1986) The Butterflies of North America: A Natural History and Field Guide. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
20. Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y & Lederhouse RC (1995) Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Scientific Publishers, Inc, Gainesville, FL, USA.
21. Slansky F & Scriber JM (1985) Food Consumption and Utilization. Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology (ed. by GA Kerkut & LI Gilbert), pp. 87-163. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
22. Sperling FAH (1987) Evolution of the Papilio machaon species group in western Canada (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Quaestiones Entomologicae 23: 198-315.
23. Strong DR, Lawton JH & Southwood R (1984) Insects on Plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
24. Thompson JN (1988a) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 47: 3-14.
25. Thompson JN (1988b) Variation in preference and specificity in monophagous and oligophagous swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 42: 118-128.
26. Thompson JN (1995) The origins of host shifts in swallowtail butterflies versus other insects. Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (ed. by JM Scriber, Y Tsubaki & RC Lederhouse), pp. 195-203. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FL, USA.
27. Thompson JN (1998) The evolution of diet breadth: monophagy and polyphagy in swallowtail butterflies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11: 563-578.
28. Thompson JN & Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 36: 65-89.
29. Wiklund C (1975) The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon L. Oecologia 18: 185-197.
30. Wiklund C (1981) Generalist vs. specialist oviposition behaviour in Papilio machaon (Lepidoptera) and functional aspects on the hierarchy of oviposition preferences. Oikos 36: 163-170.