INR comparison between the CoaguChek® S and a standard laboratory method among patients with self-management of oral anticoagulation

Thrombosis Research

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 489-495

  Hentrich, Dorota Palka ^a   Fritschi, Jordan ^a   Müller, Pascale Raddatz ^a   Wuillemin, Walter A ^a  

^a Central Hematology Laboratory   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

CoaguChek S; Oral anticoagulation; Patient self management; Prothrombin time; Quick; Thromboplastin time

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; CAPILLARY BLOOD; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; LABORATORY TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CARE;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTICOAGULANTS; COUMARINS; DRUG MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; LABORATORY TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; PROTHROMBIN TIME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THROMBOSIS;

EID: 33846528631     PISSN: 00493848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ansell J., Hirsh J., Poller L., Bussey H., Jacobson A., and Hylek E. The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 126 (2004) 204-233
2. Cromheecke M.E., Levi M., Colly L.P., de Mol B.J.M., Prins M.H., Hutten B.A., et al. Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic: a randomised cross-over comparison. Lancet 356 (2000) 97-102
3. Caliezi C., Waber M., Pfiffner D., Saner H., Lämmle B., and Wuillemin W.A. Patienten-Selbstkontrolle der oralen Antikoagulation mit CoaguChek. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 130 (2000) 916-923
4. Watzke H.H., Forberg E., Svolba G., Jimenez-Boj E., and Krinninger B. A prospective controlled trial comparing weekly self-testing and self-dosing with the standard management of patients on stable oral anticoagulation. Thromb Haemost 83 (2000) 661-665
5. Sawicki PT for the Working Group for the Study of Patient Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation. A structured teaching and self-management program for patients receiving oral anticoagulation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 281 (1999) 145-150
6. Gadisseur A.P.A., Kaptein A.A., Breukink-Engbers W.G.M., van der Meer F.J.M., and Rosendaal F.R. Patient self-management of oral anticoagulant care vs. management by specialized anticoagulation clinics: positive effects on quality of life. J Thromb Haemost 2 (2004) 584-591
7. Siebenhofer A., Berghold A., and Sawicki P.T. Systematic review of studies of self-management of oral anticoagulation. Thromb Haemost 91 (2004) 225-232
8. Menendez-Jandula B., Souto J.C., Oliver A., Montserrat I., Quintana M., Gich I., et al. Comparing self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy with clinic management. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 142 (2005) 1-10
9. Anderson D.R., Harrison L., and Hirsh J. Evaluation of a portable prothrombin time monitor for home use by patients who require long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. Arch Intern Med 153 (1993) 1441-1447
10. Van den Besselaar A.M.H.P., Breddin K., Lutze G., Parker-Williams J., Taborski U., Vogel G., et al. Multicenter evaluation of a new capillary blood prothrombin time monitoring system. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 6 (1995) 726-732
11. Burri S., Demarmels Biasiutti F., Lämmle B., and Wuillemin W.A. Vergleich der Quick-/ INR-Werte aus kapillärem Vollblut (CoaguChek® Plus) und venösem Citratplasma bei Patienten mit und ohne orale Antikoagulation. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 128 (1998) 1723-1729
12. N and a standard laboratory method. Thromb Res 113 (2004) 327-332
13. Jackson S.L., Bereznicki L.R., Peterson G.M., Marsden K.A., Jupe D.M.L., Tegg E., et al. Accuracy, reproducibility and clinical utility of the CoaguChek S portable international normalized ratio monitor in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic. Clin Lab Haematol 26 (2004) 49-55
14. Fitzmaurice D.A., Machin S.J., and on behalf of the British Society of Haematology Task Force for Haemostasis and Thrombosis. Recommendations for patients undertaking self management of oral anticoagulation. BMJ 323 (2001) 985-989
15. Havrda D.E., Hawk T.L., and Marvin C.M. Accuracy and precision of the CoaguChek S versus laboratory INRs in a clinic. Ann Pharmacother 36 (2002) 769-775
16. Loebstein R., Kurnik D., Lubetsky A., Ezra D., and Halkin H. Potential dosing errors using portable prothrombin time monitoring devices. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 14 (2003) 479-483
17. Jonsson M., Hillarp A., and Svensson P. Comparison between CoaguChek S-and Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Res 114 (2004) 83-89
18. Jackson S.L., Bereznicki L.R., Peterson G.M., Marsden K.A., Jupe D.M., Vial J.H., et al. Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the near-patient testing CoaguChek S international normalised ratio monitor in rural medical practice. Aust J Rural Health 12 (2004) 137-142
19. Vacas M., Lafuente P.J., Unanue I., and Iriarte J.A. Comparative study of two portable systems for oral anticoagulant monitoring. Hematol J 5 (2004) 35-38
20. Attermann J., Andersen N.T., Korsgaard H., Maegaard M., and Hasenkam J.M. Precision of INR measured with a patient operated whole blood coagulometer. Thromb Res 110 (2003) 65-68
21. Williams K., Mackie I.J., Machin S.J., and Cohen H. Patient self-testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring. Br J Haematol 128 (2005) 242-247
22. Eisenwiener H.G., Bablok W., Bardorff W., Bender R., Markowetz D., Passing H., et al. Statistische Auswertung beim Methodenvergleich. Lab Med 8 (1984) 232-244
23. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346 (1995) 1085-1087
24. Taborski U., Braun S.L., and Völler H. Analytical performance of the new coagulation monitoring system INRatio™ for the determination of INR compared with the coagulation monitor CoaguChek S and an established laboratory method. J Thromb Thrombolysis 18 (2004) 103-107
25. Horsti J., Uppa H., and Vilpo A. Poor agreement among prothrombin time international normalized ratio methods: comparison of seven commercial reagents. Clin Chem 51 (2005) 553-560
26. Kaatz S.S., White R.H., Hill J., Mascha E., Humphries J.E., and Becker D.M. Accuracy of laboratory and portable monitor international normalized ratio determinations. Comparison with a criterion standard. Arch Intern Med 155 (1995) 1861-1867
27. Kapiotis S., Quehenberger P., and Speiser W. Evaluation of the new method CoaguChek® for the determination of prothrombin time from capillary blood: comparison with Thrombotest on KC-1®. Thromb Res 77 (1995) 563-567
28. Douketis J.D., Lane A., Milne J., and Ginsberg J.S. Accuracy of a portable international normalized ratio monitor in outpatients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy: comparison with a laboratory reference standard using clinically relevant criteria for agreement. Thromb Res 92 (1998) 11-17
29. Murray E.T., Fitzmaurice D.A., Allan T.F., and Hobbs F.D.R. A primary care evaluation of three near patient coagulometers. J Clin Pathol 52 (1999) 842-845
30. Gosselin R., Owings J.T., White R.H., Hutchinson R., Branch J., Mahackian K., et al. A comparison of point-of-care instruments designed for monitoring oral anticoagulation with standard laboratory methods. Thromb Haemost 83 (2000) 698-703
31. Ruzicka K., Kapiotis S., Quehenberger P., Handler S., Hornykewycz S., Michitsch A., et al. Evaluation of bedside prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time measurement by coagulation analyzer CoaguChek Plus in various clinical settings. Thromb Res 87 (1997) 431-440