Macrophyte refuges, prey behaviour and trophic interactions: Consequences for lake water clarity

Ecology Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 105-114

  Genkai Kato, Motomi ^a  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Eutrophication; Game theory; Lake morphometry; Macrophytes; Regime shift; Trophic structure

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER;

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EUTROPHICATION; GAME THEORY; HABITAT SELECTION; LAKE WATER; MACROPHYTE; PISCIVORE; PLANKTIVORE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REFUGE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TROPHIC INTERACTION; TROPHIC STRUCTURE;

ALGA; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM; FISH; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; ZOOPLANKTON;

ALGAE; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; FISHES; FRESH WATER; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; ZOOPLANKTON;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33846522463     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01000.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alonzo, S.H., Switzer, P.V. & Mangel, M. (2003). Ecological games in space and time: the distribution and abundance of antarctic krill and penguins. Ecology, 84, 1598-1607.
2. van Baalen, M. & Sabelis, M.W. (1993). Coevolution of patch selection strategies of predator and prey and the consequences for ecological stability. Am. Nat., 142, 646-670.
3. Brown, J.S., Laundré, J.W. & Gurung, M. (1999). The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J. Mammal., 80, 385-399.
4. Burks, R.L., Lodge, D.M., Jeppesen, E. & Lauridsen, T.L. (2002). Diel horizontal migration of zooplankton: costs and benefits of inhabiting the littoral. Freshw. Biol., 47, 343-365.
5. Canfield, D.E. Jr, Shireman, J.V., Colle, D.E., Haller, W.T., Watkins, C.E. & Maceina, M.J. (1984). Prediction of chlorophyll a concentrations in Florida lakes: importance of aquatic macrophytes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 41, 497-501.
6. Carpenter, S.R. (2003). Regime Shifts in Lake Ecosystems: Pattern and Variation. Volume 15 in the Excellence in Ecology Series. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe.
7. 13C addition to contrasting lakes. Ecology, 86, 2737-2750.
8. Clark, C.W. & Levy, D.A. (1988). Diel vertical migrations by juvenile sockeye salmon and the antipredation window. Am. Nat., 131, 271-290.
9. Cressman, R., Křivan, V. & Garay, J. (2004). Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multiple-species environments. Am. Nat., 164, 473-489.
10. Fretwell, S.D. & Lucas, H.L. (1970). On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor., 19, 16-36.
11. Genkai-Kato, M. & Carpenter, S.R. (2005). Eutrophication due to phosphorus recycling in relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology, 86, 210-219.
12. Grover, J.P. (1995). Competition, herbivory, and enrichment: nutrient-based models for edible and inedible plants. Am. Nat., 145, 746-774.
13. Hugie, D.M. & Dill, L.M. (1994). Fish and game: a game theoretic approach to habitat selection by predators and prey. J. Fish Biol., 45, 151-169.
14. Iwasa, Y. (1982). Vertical migration of zooplankton: a game between predator and prey. Am. Nat., 120, 171-180.
15. Kacelnik, A., Krebs, J.R. & Bernstein, C. (1992). The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends Ecol. Evol., 7, 50-55.
16. Křivan, V. (1997). Dynamic ideal free distribution: effects of optimal patch choice on predator-prey dynamics. Am. Nat., 149, 164-178.
17. Křivan, V. & Sirot, E. (2002). Habitat selection by two competing species in a two-habitat environment. Am. Nat., 160, 214-234.
18. Lima, S.L. (2002). Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 70-75.
19. Luecke, C., Lunte, C.C., Wright, R.A., Robertson, D. & McLain, A.S. (1992). Impacts of variation in planktivorous fish on abundance of Daphnids: a simulation model of the Lake Mendota food web. In: Food Web Management: A Case Study of Lake Mendota (ed. Kitchell, J.F.). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 407-425.
20. Milinski, M. (1988). Games fish play: making decisions as a social forager. Trends Ecol. Evol., 3, 325-330.
21. Muck, P. & Lampert, W. (1984). An experimental study on the importance of food conditions for the relative abundance of calanoid copepods and cladocerans. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 66, 157-179.
22. Mylius, S., Klumpers, K., de Roos, A.M. & Persson, L. (2001). Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient. Am. Nat., 158, 259-276.
23. Persson, L. (1991). Behavioral response to predators reverses the outcome of competition between prey species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28, 101-105.
24. Persson, L., Leonardsson, K., de Roos, A.M., Gyllenberg, M. & Christensen, B. (1998). Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rate and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model. Theor. Popul. Biol., 54, 270-293.
25. Priyadarshana, T., Asaeda, T. & Manatunge, J. (2001). Foraging behaviour of planktivorous fish in artificial vegetation: the effects on swimming and feeding. Hydrobiologia, 442, 231-239.
26. Reynolds, C.S. (1984). The Ecology of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Savino, J.F. & Stein, R.A. (1989). Behavioural interaction between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant density. Anim. Behav., 37, 311-321.
28. Scavia, D., Land, G.A. & Kitchell, J.F. (1988). Dynamics of Lake Michigan plankton: a model evaluation of nutrient loading, competition, and predation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 165-177.
29. Scheffer, M. (1998). Ecology of Shallow Lakes. Chapman and Hall, New York.
30. Scheffer, M. (1999). The effect of aquatic vegetation on turbidity; how important are the filter feeders? Hydrobiologia, 408/409, 307-316.
31. Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591-596.
32. Schriver, P., Bøgestrand, J., Jeppesen, E. & Søndergaard, M. (1995). Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions: large-scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Freshw. Biol., 33, 255-270.
33. Timms, R.M. & Moss, B. (1984). Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing, in the presence of zooplanktivorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr., 29, 472-486.
34. Vadeboncoeur, Y., Vander Zanden, M.J. & Lodge, D.M. (2002). Putting the lake back together: reintegrating benthic pathways into lake food web models. BioScience, 52, 44-54.
35. Vadeboncoeur, Y., Jeppesen, E., Vander Zanden, M.J., Schierup, H.-H., Christoffersen, K. & Lodge, D.M. (2003). From Greenland to green lakes: cultural eutrophication and the loss of benthic pathways in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 48, 1408-1418.
36. Vander Zanden, M.J. & Vadeboncoeur, Y. (2002). Fishes as integrators of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology, 83, 2152-2161.
37. Vanni, M.J., Carpenter, S.R. & Luecke, C. (1992). A simulation model of the interactions among nutrients, phytoplankton, and zooplankton in Lake Mendota. In: Food Web Management: A Case Study of Lake Mendota (ed. Kitchell, J.F.). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 427-449.
38. Wootton, R.J. (1998). Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.