Statistical shape analysis of nose in Turkish young adults

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 219-224

  Ercan, Ilker ^a,b   Etoz, Abdullah ^a,b   Guney, Ibrahim ^a,b   Ocakoglu, Gokhan ^a,b   Turan Ozdemir, Senem ^a,b   Kan, Ismet ^a,b   Kahveci, Ramazan ^a,b  

^a Uludag University ^*

^b ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

EDMA; Nose; Photogrammetry; Statistical shape analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NOSE; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGEON; TREATMENT PLANNING; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOSE; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS; TURKEY;

EID: 33846514599     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000248642.17965.82     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Enciso R, Shaw A, Neumann U, et al. 3D head anthropometric analysis, In proceedings of the international society for optical engineering SPIE Medical Imaging 2003;5029:590-597
2. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/ races. J Craniofacial Surg 2005;16:615-646
3. Bozkir MG, Karakas P, Oguz O. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:212-219
4. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, et al. Three-dimensional study of growth and development of the nose. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:309-317
5. Leong SCL, White PS. A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the Oriental and Caucasian nose. Clin Otolaryngol 2004;29:672-676
6. Milgrim LM, Lawson W, Cohen AF. Anthropometric analysis of the female Latino nose. Revised aesthetic concept and their surgical implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:1079-1086
7. Mishima K,Mori Y, Yamada T, et al. Anthropometric Analysis of the Nose in the Japanese. Cell Tissues Organs 2002;170: 198-206
8. Ochi K, Ohashi T. The effects of an external nasal dilator and nasal dimensions in Asian. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:160-163
9. Ofodile FA, Bokhari F. The African-American nose: part II. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34:123-129
10. Romo T, Abraham MT. The ethnic nose. Fac Plast Surg 2003;19:269-277
11. Uzun A, Akbas H, Bilgic S, et al. The average values of the nasal anthropometric measurements in 108 young Turkish males. Auris Nasus Larynx 2006;33:31-35
12. Hwang T-S, Kang H-S. Morphometry of nasal bases and nostrils in Koreans. Ann Anat 2003;185:189-193
13. Farkas LG, Phillips JH, Katic M. Anthropometric anatomical and morphological nose widths in Canadian-Caucasion adults. Can J Plast Surg 1998;6:149-151
14. Williams FL, Richtsmeier JT. Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3d digitizer data. Clinical Anatomy 2003;16:494-500
15. Lele S, Richtsmeier JT. An invariant approach to statistical analysis of shapes. Boca Raton-London-New York-Washington DC: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2001:162-163
16. Lele S, Richtsmeier JT. Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate free approach to comparing biological shapes using landmark data. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991;86:415-428
17. Lele S. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Math Geol 1993; 25:573-602
18. Burrows AM, Richtsmeier JT, Mooney MP, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of craniofacial form in a familial rabbit model of nonsyndromic coronal synostosis using Euclidean distance matrix analysis. Cleft palate-Craniofacial Journal 1999;36:196-206
19. Dryden I. Shapes: Statistical shape analysis. 2004: R package version 1.0-8
20. DeCarlo D, Dimitris M, Stone M. An Anthropometric face model using variational techniques. 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. Appeared in Proceedings SIGGRAPH' 98, 1998:67-74
21. Douglas T. Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry. Comput Med Imaging and Graph 2004;28:401-409
22. Majid Z, Chong AK, Ahmad A, et al. Photogrammetry and 3D laser scanning as spatial data capture techniques for a national craniofacial database. The Photogrammetric Record 2005;20:48-68
23. Mori A, Nakajima T, Kaneko T, et al. Analysis of 109 Japanese children's lip and nose shapes using 3-dimensional digitizer. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58:318-329
24. Nechala P, Mahoney J, Farkas LG. Digital two-dimensional photogrammetry: a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103: 1819-1825
25. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: a computerized three-dimensional mesh diagram analysis. Clin Anat 2003;16:420-443
26. Weinberg SM, Kolar JC. Three-dimensional surface imaging: limitations and considerations from the anthropometric perspective. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:847-851
27. Polina G, Grimson WEL, Shenton ME, et al. Deformation analysis for shaped based classification, information processing in medical imaging: 17th International Conference, IPMI 2001:517-500
28. Theodore MC III, Richtsmeier JT. A simple method for visualization of influential landmarks when using euclidean distance matrix analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 1998;107: 273-283
29. Aung SC, Foo CL, Lee ST. Three dimensional laser scan assessment of the Oriental nose with a new classification of Oriental nasal types. Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:109-116
30. Borman H, Ozgur F, Gursu G. Evaluation of soft tissue morphology of the face in 1050 young adults. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42:280-288