A naïve ontology for concepts of time and space for searching and learning

Information Research

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Miwa, Makiko ^a   Kando, Noriko ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MULTIMEDIA EDUCATION   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846505448     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N. & Brooks, H.M. (1982). ASK for information retrieval I & II. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), 61-71 & (3), 145-164.
2. Bertin, J. (1967). Semiologie graphique. Paris and Den Haag: Mouton. [English translation: Semiology of graphics Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press]
3. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative and Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Learning Technology Standards Committee Taskforce. (2002). IEEE Learning Object Metadata RDF binding. Retrieved 16 December, 2006 from http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/DCMIIEEELTSCTaskforce
4. Hearst, M., English, J., Shinha, R., Swearingen, K. & Yee, P. (2002). Finding the flow in Web site search. Communications of the ACM, 45(9), 42-49.
5. Hert, C.A. (1997). Understanding information retrieval interactions: theoretical and practical implications. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.
6. Hsieh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(3), 117-120.
7. Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H. & Gay, G. (2005). Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, Salvador, Brazil, 2005. (pp. 154-161). New York, NY: ACM Press.
8. th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Kauai, HI, 2006. Track 3. (pp. 54.1-54.10). Washington, DC: IEEE.
9. Kelly, D. & Teevan, J (2003). Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2), 18-28. Retrieved 19 December, 2006 from http://www.acm.org/sigs/sigir/forum/2003F/ teevan.pdf
10. th IFIP Working Conference on User Interfaces. Ellivouri, Finland, Aug. 10-14. (pp. 191-203). Amersterdam: North-Holland Publishing
11. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Lancaster, F.W. (1986). Vocabulary control for information retrieval. Arlington, VA: Information Resource Press.
13. Miwa, M. (2000). Use of human intermediation in information problem solving: a users' perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY. Retrieved 30 January, 2006 from http://www.nime.ac.jp/~miwamaki/dissertation.htm
14. Pennanen, M. & Vakkari, P. (2003). Students' conceptual structure, search process and outcome while preparing a research proposal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(8), 759-770.
15. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M. & Nilan, M. (1990). A reexamination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing & Management, 26 (6), 755-776.
16. Sihvonen, A. & Vakkari, P. (2004). Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus. Journal of Documentation, 60(6), 673-690.
17. Vakkari, P., Pennanen, M. & Serola, S. (2003). Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal. Information Processing & Management, 39(3), 445-463.
18. th ASIS Annual Meeting, 34, 101-110.