A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Guo, Wenge ^a   Romano, Joseph ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

False discovery proportion; Generalized familywise error rate; Multiple testing; P value; Sidak procedure; Stepdown procedure

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NULL HYPOTHESIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 33846498939     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15446115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1247     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289-300.
2. Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165-1188.
3. Dudoit, S., van der Laan, M. and Birkner, M. (2004). Multiple testing procedures for controlling tail probability error rates. Working Paper 166, U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics, Available at http://www.bepress.com/ ucbbiostat/paper166/.
4. Dudoit, S., van der Laan, M. and Pollard, K. (2004). Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 3(1): Article 13. Available at http://www.bepress.com/sagmb/vol3/iss1/art13.
5. Finner, H. and Roters, M. (1994). On the limit behaviour of the joint distribution function of order statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 46, 343-349.
6. Genovese, C. and Wasserman, L. (2004). A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. Annals of Statistics, 32, 1035-1061.
7. Guo, W. and Rao, B. (2006). On generalized closure principle for generalized familywise error rates. University of Cincinnati, Unpublished report.
8. Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. John Wiley, New York.
9. Holland, B. and Copenhaver, M. (1987). An improved sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure. Biometrics, 43, 417-423.
10. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70.
11. Hommel, G. and Hoffmann, T. (1987). Controlled uncertainty. In Multiple Hypothesis Testing (P. Bauer, G. Hommel and E. Sonnemann, eds.) 154-161. Springer, Heidelberg.
12. Kantrovich, L. V. and Akilov, G. P. (1964). Functional Analysis in Normed Spaces. Pergamon Press, Elmford, New York.
13. Korn, E., Troendle, J., McShane, L. and Simon, R. (2004). Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 124, 379-398.
14. Lehmann, E. L. and Romano, J. (2005a). Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Annals of Statistics 33, 1138-1154.
15. Lehmann, E. L. and Romano, J. (2005b). Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 3rd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.
16. Miller, R. (1981). Simultaneous Statistical Inference, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.
17. Perone Pacifico, M., Genovese, C., Verdinelli, I. and Wasserman, L. (2004). False discovery rates for random fields. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 99, 1002-1014.
18. Romano, J. and Shaikh, A. (2006a). On stepdown control of the false discovery proportion. In The Second E. L. Lehmann Symposium - Optimality, ed. Javier Rojo, Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, Volume 49, 40-61.
19. Romano, J. and Shaikh, A. (2006b). Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate. Annals of Statistics, to appear.
20. Romano, J. and Wolf, M. (2005). Control of generalized error rates in multiple testing. Technical Report 2005-12, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.
21. Sarkar, S. (2005). Generalizing Simes' test and Hochberg's stepup procedure. Unpublished report.
22. Sarkar, S. and Chang, C. (1997). The Simes method for multiple hypothesis testing with positively dependent test statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 92, 1601-1608.
23. Simes, R. (1986). An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73, 751-754.
24. van der Laan, M., Birkner, M., and Hubbard, A. (2005). Resampling based multiple testing procedure controlling tail probability of the proportion of false positives. Working Paper 172, U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics. Available at http://www.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper172
25. van der Laan, M., Dudoit, S., and Pollard, K. (2004). Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 3(1), Article 15. Available at http://www.bepress.com/sagmb/vol3/iss1/art14
26. Victor, N. (1982). Exploratory data analysis and clinical research. Methods of Information in Medicine 21, 53-54.