Anisotropic crosshole resistivity tomography for ground safety analysis of a high-storied building over an abandoned mine

Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 225-235

  Kim, Jung Ho ^a   Yi, Myeong Jong ^a   Cho, Seong Jun ^a   Son, Jeong Sul ^a   Song, Won Kyong ^a  

^a Korea Institute of Geosceince and Mineral Resources   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABANDONED MINES; ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; APARTMENT HOUSES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY;

ACTIVE CONSTRAINT BALANCING; ANISOTROPIC CROSSHOLE RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRICAL ANISOTROPY; GROUND SAFETY ANALYSIS; LEAST-SQUARES INVERSION;

TALL BUILDINGS;

ABANDONED MINE; ALGORITHM; ANISOTROPY; BUILDING; CROSSHOLE SEISMIC METHOD; DATA INVERSION; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; SAFETY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 33846495605     PISSN: 10831363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2113/JEEG11.4.225     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Daily, W., and Owen, E., 1991, Cross-borehole resistivity tomography: Geophysics, 56, 1228-1235.
2. Daily, W., and Ramirez, A., 1995, Electrical resistance tomography during in-situ trichloroethylene remediation at the Savannah River Site: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33, 239-249.
3. Daily, W., and Ramirez, A.L., 2000, Electrical imaging of engineered hydraulic barriers: Geophysics, 65, 83-94.
4. Herwanger, J.V., Pain, C.C., Binley, A., de Oliveira, C.R.E., and Worthington, M.H., 2004a, Anisotropy resistivity tomography: Geophysical Journal International, 158, 409-425.
5. Herwanger, J.V., Worthington, M.H., Lubbe, R., Binley, A., and Khazanehdari, J., 2004b, A comparison of crosshole-electrical and seismic data in fractured rock: Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 109-121.
6. Hoek, E., and Brown, E.T., 1980, Underground excavations in rock: Institution of Mining and Materials, London, 527.
7. Hoek, E., and Brown, E.T., 1997, Practical estimates of rock mass strength: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 34, 1165-1186.
8. Itasca Consulting Group, 2000a, FLAC User's Guide.
9. Itasca Consulting Group, 2000b, UDEC User's Guide.
10. Kim, J.-H., Yi, M.-J., and Cho, S.-J., 2004, Application of high-resolution geoelectric imaging techniques to geotechnical engineering in Korea: Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium 3rd ARMS, Kyoto, Japan, Ohnishi, Y., and Aoki, K. (eds.), Vol. 1, 191-196.
11. Kim, J.-H., Cho, S.-J., Yi, M.-J., and Sato, M., 2006, Application of anisotropy borehole radar tomography in Korea: Near Surface Geophysics, 4, 13-18.
12. LaBrecque, D.J., and Casale, D., 2002, Experience with anisotropic inversion for electrical resistivity tomography: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP 2002), 11ELE6.
13. LaBrecque, D.J., Heath, G., Sharpe, R., and Versteeg, R., 2004, Autonomous monitoring of fluid movement using 3-D electrical resistivity tomography: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 9, 167-176.
14. Maillol, J.M., Seguin, M.-K., Gupta, O.P., Akhauri, H.M., and Sen, N., 1999, Electrical resistivity tomography survey for delineating uncharted mine galleries in West Bengol, India: Geophysical prospecting, 47, 103-116.
15. Sasaki, Y., 1992, Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation: Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 453-464.
16. Shima, H., 1992, 2-D and 3-D resistivity image reconstruction using crosshole data: Geophysics, 57, 1270-1281.
17. Slater, L., Binley, A.M., Daily, W., and Johnson, R., 2000, Crosshole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 44, 85-102.
18. Yi, M.-J., Kim, J.-H., and Chung, S.-H., 2003, Enhancing the resolving power of least-squares inversion with active constraint balancing: Geophysics, 68, 931-941.