Skills training in pediatric minimal access surgery

Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 284-289

  Najmaldin, Azad ^a  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Minimal access surgery; Pediatric; Skills training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HUMAN; OPERATING ROOM; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SURGICAL TRAINING; VALIDATION PROCESS; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PEDIATRICS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; OPERATING ROOMS; PEDIATRICS; PRECEPTORSHIP; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; SPECIALTIES, SURGICAL; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33846495530     PISSN: 00223468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.10.033     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Smith R. All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. BMJ 316 (1998) 1917-1918
2. Cuschieri A. Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg 169 (1995) 9-19
3. Miliken I., and Dick A. Trends in training in pediatric laparoscopic surgery. Presented at the ASIT Meeting, Sheffield, UK, February (2004)
4. Kopta J.A. An approach to the evaluation of operative skills. Surgery 70 (1971) 297-303
5. Norman G.R. Defining competence: a methodological review. In: Neufield V.R., and Norman G.R. (Eds). Assessing clinical competence (1985), Springer, New York 15-35
6. Spencer R.W. Deductive reasoning in the life long continuing education of a cardiovascular surgeon. Arch Surg 111 (1976) 1177-1183
7. Gibbons R.D., Baker R.J., and Skinner D.B. Field articulation testing: a predictor of technical skills in surgical residents. J Surg Res 41 (1986) 53-57
8. Schuenman A.L., Picleman J., Hesslein R., et al. Neuropsychologic predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery 96 (1984) 288-295
9. Deary I.J., Graham K.S., and Maran A.G.D. Relationship between surgical ability ratings and spatial abilities and personality. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37 (1992) 74-79
10. Kirkpatrick J.J., and Naylor I.L. The qualities and conduct of an English surgeon in 1446. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79 (1977) 225-228
11. Fielding L.P., Stewart-Brown S., Blesovsky L., et al. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large bowel cancer: a multicentre study. BMJ 9 (1998) 411-414
12. Pettigrew R.A., Burns H.J.G., and Carter D.C. Evaluating surgical risk: the importance of technical factors in determining the outcome. Br J Surg 74 (1987) 971-994
13. Krummel T.M. Surgical simulation and virtual reality: the coming evolution. Ann Surg 228 (1998) 635-637
14. Champion H.R., and Gallagher A.G. Surgical simulation-a good idea whose time has come. Br J Surg 90 (2003) 767-768
15. Kirwan W.O., Kaar T.K., and Waldron R. Starting laparoscopic cholecystectomy-the pig as a training model. Ir J Med Sci 160 (1991) 243-246
16. Clayden G.S. Teaching laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary training on animals is essential. BMJ 309 (1994) 342
17. Majeed A.W., Reed M.W., and Johnson A.G. Simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74 (1992) 70-71
18. Scott D.J., Bergen P.C., Rege R.V., et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?. J Am Coll Surg 191 (2000) 272-283
19. Lee A.C.H. A homemade minimal access surgical skills station. Pediatri Endosurg Innov Tech 7 (2003) 273-277
20. Derossis A.M., Fried G.M., Abrahamowiczm, et al. Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175 (1998) 482-487
21. Donias H.W., Schwartz T., Tang D.G., et al. A porcine beating heart model for robotic artery surgery. Heart Surg Forum 6 (2003) 249-253
22. Coleman J., Nduka C.C., and Darzi A. Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 81 (1994) 1709-1711
23. Seymour N.E., Gallagher A.G., Roman S.A., et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomised double blinded study. Ann Surg 236 (2002) 454-464
24. Lee B.R., Bishoff J.T., Janetschek G., et al. A novel method of surgical instructions: international telementoring. World J Urol 16 (1998) 367-370
25. Smith C.D., Farrell T.M., McNatt S.S., et al. Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg 181 (2001) 547-550
26. Stefanidis D., Korndorffer Jr. J.R., Markley S., et al. Proficiency maintenance: impacted ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention. J Am Coll Surg 202 (2006) 599-603
27. Torkington J., Smith S.G.T., Rees B., et al. The role of the basic surgical skills course in the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skill. Surg Endosc 15 (2001) 1071-1075
28. Grantcharov T.P., Kristiansen V.B., Bendix J., et al. Randomised clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91 (2004) 146-150
29. Anwar R.A.H., Bosk C., and Greenburg A.G. Resident evaluation: is it, can it, should it be objective. J Surg Res 30 (1981) 27-41
30. Streiner D.L. Global rating scales. In: Neufield V.R., and Norman G.R. (Eds). Assessing clinical competence vol. 7 (1985), Springer, Springer Services on Medical Education, New York 119-141
31. Martin J.A., Regehr G., Reznick R., et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84 (1997) 273-278
32. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Granting privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161 (1991) 324-325
33. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons. Training and assessment of competence. Surg Endosc 8 (1994) 721-722
34. Elliot D.L., and Hickman D.H. Evaluation of physical examination skills. Reliability of faculty observers and patient instructors. JAMA 258 (1987) 3405-3408
35. Joice P., Hanna G., and Cuschieri A. Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery-a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 29 (1998) 409-414
36. Warf B.C., Donnelly M.B., Shwartz R.W., et al. Interpreting the judgement of surgical faculty regarding resident competence. J Surg Res 86 (1999) 29-35
37. Royal College of Surgeons of England. Surgical competence: challenges of assessment in training and practice (1999), Smith and Nephew Foundation, London
38. Eubanks T.R., Clements R.H., Pohl D., et al. An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189 (1999) 566-574
39. Moorthy K., Munz Y., Dosis A., et al. Motion analysis in the training and assessment of minimal invasive surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 12 (2003) 137-142
40. Smith S.G., Torkington J., Brown T.J., et al. Motion analysis. Surg Endosc 16 (2002) 640-645
41. Aggarwal R., Hance J., Moorthy K., et al. Assessment of psychomotor skills acquisition during laparoscopic cholecystectomy course. Br J Surg 91 Suppl 1 (2004) 66
42. Hann G.B., Drew T., Clinch P., et al. Computer-controlled endoscopic performance assessment system. Surg Endosc 12 (1998) 997-1000
43. Francis N.K., Hanna G.B., and Chuschieri A. The performance of master surgeons on the advanced Dundee endoscopic psychomotor tester: contrast validity study. Arch Surg 137 (2002) 841-844
44. Gallagher A.G., Smith C.D., Bowers S.P., et al. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197 (2003) 479-488
45. Menon M., Shrivastava A., Tewari A., et al. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis or outcomes. J Urol 168 (2002) 945-949
46. Rotnes J.S., Kaasa T., Westgaard G., et al. Digital trainer developed for robotic assisted cardiac surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 81 (2001) 424-430
47. Nedas T.G., Challacombe B., and Dasgupta P. Virtual reality in urology. BJU Int 94 (2004) 255-257
48. Prasad S.M., Manian H.S., Soper N.J., et al. The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 183 (2002) 702-707
49. Youhannes P., Rotariu P., Pinto P., et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?. Urology 60 (2002) 39-45