Using systematic reviews for evidence-based health promotion: Basic methodology issues;Uso de las revisiones sistemáticas en promoción de la salud basada en la evidencia: Aspectos metodológicos básicos

Revista de Salud Publica

Volumn 8, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2006, Pages 94-105

  Buendía Rodríguez, Jefferson A ^a   Sánchez Villamil, Juana P ^b  

^a UNISALUD   (Colombia)

^b Laboratorio de Salud Pública Secretaría de Salud   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine (source: MeSH, NLM); Health promotion

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846493616     PISSN: 01240064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0124-00642006000500008     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Hawe P. How much trial and error should we tolerate in community trials? BMJ 2000; 320:119.
2. Tang KC, Ehsani JP, McQueen DV. Evidence-based health promotion: recollections, reflections and reconsiderations. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 841-843.
3. Klassen TP, Jadad AR, Moher D. Guidelines for reading and interpreting systematic reviews. 1. Getting Started. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152: 700-704.
4. Hedin A, Kallestal C. Knowledge based public health work. Part 2: Handbook for compilation of reviews on interventions in the field of public health. National Institute of Public Health [Internet]. Sweden 2004 Disponible en: http://www.fhi.se/shop/material_pdf/r200410Knowledgebased2.pdf Consultado: Abril 16 de 2006.
5. nd Ed. 2001. Disponible en: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm. Consultado: Febrero de 2006.
6. Jackson SF, Edwards RK, Kahan B, Goodstadt M. An assessment of the methods and concepts used to synthesize the evidence of effectiveness in health promotion: A review of 17 initiatives [Internet]. Sep. 2001. Disponible en http://www. utoronto.ca/chp/CCHPR/synthesisfinalreport.pdf. Consultado: Octubre 10 de 2006.
7. Waters E, Doyle J, Jackson N, Howes F, Brunton G, Oakley A. Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: the role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 285-289.
8. Dane AV, Schneider BH. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? Clin Psychol Rev 1998; 18: 23-45.
9. Campbell DR, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing, 1963.
10. Canadian Task Force on Periodic Health Examination. Periodic Health Examination. Can Med Assoc J 1979;121: 1193-254.
11. Sackett DL. The Cochrane Collaboration. ACP Journal Club 1994 120; (suppl 3): A-11.
12. nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996.
13. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002. 56; 119-27.
14. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess. 2003; 7(27): III-X, 1-173.
15. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Assessment of study quality. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5. Actualizado Mayo 2005; Sección 6. [Internet]. Disponible en http://www.cochrane.dk/cochrane/ handbook/hbook.htm. Consultado: Junio 29 de 2005
16. University of Ottawa. Effective practice and organisation of care group. EPOC methods paper: including interrupted time series (ITS) designs in a EPOC Review [Internet]. Disponible en: http://www.epoc.uottawa.ca/inttime.pdf. Consultado: Enero 31 de 2006
17. Steckler A, Linnan LE. Eds. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
18. Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG. Methods for evaluating area-wide and organization-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999; 3(5): III-92.
19. Torgerson DJ. Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ. 2001; 322(7282): 3557.
20. Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL. Design and analysis of group randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar; 94(3): 423 32.
21. Public Health Electronic Library. [Internet].. Disponible en: http://www.phel.gov.uk/toolsandresources/toolsandresources.asp. Consultado: Octubre 22 de 2005.
22. Evans T, Brown H. Road traffic crashes: operationalizing equity in the context of health sector reform. Injury Control and Safety Promotion 2003; 10(2): 11-12.
23. Grayson L, Gomersall A. A difficult business: finding the evidence for social science reviews, working paper 19. Town: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice; 2003.
24. Beahler CC, Sundheim JJ, Trapp NI. Information retrieval in systematic reviews: challenges in the public health arena. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18(suppl 4): 6-10.
25. Peersman G, Oakley A. Learning from research. In: Oliver S, Peersman G, eds. Using research for effective health promotion. Buckingham: Oxford University Press; 2001. pp. 33-43.
26. Armstrong R, Jackson N, Doyle J, Waters E, Howes F. It's in your hands: the value of handsearching in conducting systematic reviews of public health interventions. J Public Health (Oxf) 2005; 27: 388-91.
27. Peersman G, Oliver S, Oakley A. Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Oliver S, Peersman G, eds. Using research for effective health promotion. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 2001. pp. 100-1.
28. Grimshaw JM, Freemantle N, Langhorne P, Song F. Complexity and systematic reviews: report to the US Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, 1995.
29. Irwig L, Zwarenstein M, Zwi A, Chalmers I. A flow diagram to facilitate selection of interventions and research for health care. Bull World Health Organ. 1998; 76: 17-24.