On the mechanistic derivation of various discrete-time population models

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 329-346

  Eskola, Hanna T M ^a   Geritz, Stefan A H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Beverton Holt model; Discrete time population model; Hassell model; Ricker model; Skellam model

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 33846466505     PISSN: 00928240     EISSN: 15229602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-006-9126-4     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Beverton, R.J.H., Holt, S.J., 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fisheries Investigations, Series 2, vol. 19. H. M. Stationery Office, London.
2. Brännström, Å., Sumpter, D.J.T., 2005. The role of competition and clustering in population dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 272, 2065-2072.
3. Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, É., 2004. On themechanistic underpinning of discrete-time population models with complex dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 228, 261-269.
4. Hassell, M.P., 1975. Density-dependence in single-species populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 44, 283-295.
5. Johansson, A., Sumpter, D.J.T., 2003. From local interactions to population dynamics in site-based models of ecology. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64, 497-517.
6. Ricker, W.E., 1954. Stock and recruitment. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 11, 559-623.
7. Skellam, J.G., 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38, 196-218.
8. Sumpter, D.J.T., Broomhead, D.S., 2001. Relating individual behaviour to population dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 268, 925-932.
9. Thieme, H.R.T., 2003. Mathematics in Population Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.