Fluxon modeling of low-beta plasmas

Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 116-128

  DeForest, C E ^a   Kankelborg, C C ^b  

^a SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Magnetic modelling; MHD; Numerical methods; Solar corona

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERPOLATION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

FLUXON; LOW-BETA PLASMAS; SOLAR CORONA;

PLASMAS;

EID: 33846457850     PISSN: 13646826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2006.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amari T., and Luciani J.F. Confined disruption of a three-dimensional twisted magnetic flux tube. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 515 (1999) L81
2. Antiochos S.K., Devore C.R., and Klimchuk J.A. A model for solar coronal mass ejections. The Astrophysical Journal 510 (1999) 485
3. Calidonna, C.R., Naddeo, A., 2005. Using a hybrid CA based model for a flexible qualitative qubit simulation. In: Conference on Computing Frontiers, p. 145.
4. Chen P.F., and Shibata K. An emerging flux trigger mechanism for coronal mass ejections. The Astrophysical Journal 545 (2000) 524
5. DeForest, C.E., Lamb, D.A., 2004. Clustering of the small-scale field. British Association for American Studies 204.
6. Fan Y., and Low B.C. Dynamics of CME driven by a buoyant prominence flux tube. ASP Conference Series 286 (2003) 347-354
7. Freeland S.L., and Handy B.N. Data analysis with the solarsoft system. Solar Physics 182 (1998) 497-500
8. Glazebrook, K., Brinchmann, J., Cerney, J., DeForest, C.E., Hunt, D., Jenness, T., Lukka, T.J., Schwebel, R., Soeller, C., 2003. The Perl Data Language, v. 2.4.0. Available via the web: 〈http://pdl.perl.org〉.
9. Gold T., and Hoyle F. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 120 (1960) 89
10. Hesse, M., Kuznetsova, M., Rastaetter, L., Keller, K., Falasca, A., Ritter, S., Reitan, P., 2002. The community coordinated modeling center: a strategic approach to the transition of research models to operations. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts, p. B7+, May 2003.
11. Lin J., and van Ballegooijen A.A. Catastrophic and noncatastrophic mechanisms for coronal mass ejections. The Astrophysical Journal 576 (2002) 485
12. Longcope D.W. Topology and current ribbons: a model for current, reconnection and flaring in a complex, evolving corona. Solar Physics 169 (1996) 91
13. Lundquist S. Arkiv Fysik Bd. 2 (1950) 35
14. Lynch, B.J., MacNeice, P.J., Antiochos, S.K., Zurbuchen, T.H., 2003. Coronal Mass Ejection Breakout with Adaptive Mesh Refinement. AAS/Solar Physics Division Meeting, 34, May 2003.
15. Parker E.N. Nanoflares and the solar X-ray corona. The Astrophysical Journal 330 (1988) 474-479
16. Preparata F.P., and Shamos M.I. Computational Geometry: An Introduction (2000), Springer, Berlin
17. Roussev I.I., Forbes T.G., Gombosi T.I., Sokolov I.V., DeZeeuw D.L., and Birn J. A three-dimensional flux rope model for coronal mass ejections based on a loss of equilibrium. The Astrophysical Journal 588 (2003) L45-L48
18. Sturrock P.A. The role of eruption in solar flares. Solar Physics 121 (1989) 387
19. Sturrock P.A., Kaufman P., Moore R.L., and Smith D.F. Energy release in solar flares. Solar Physics 94 (1984) 341-357
20. Ustinov A.V., Cirillo M., and Malomed B.A. Fluxon dynamics in one-dimensional Josephson-junction arrays. Physics Review B 47 (1993) 8357-8360
21. van Ballegooijen A.A. Photospheric motions as a source of twist in coronal magnetic fields. Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series 111 (1999) 213
22. Welsch B.T., DeVore C.R., and Antiochos S.K. Flux collision models of prominence formation, or breaking up is hard to do. British Association for American Studies 204 (2004)
23. Yang W.H., Sturrock P.A., and Antiochos S.K. Force-free magnetic fields-The magneto-frictional method. The Astrophysical Journal 309 (1986) 383