Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials of psychodynamic psychotherapy

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1307-1313

  Gerber, Andrew J ^a,b   Kocsis, James H ^a   Milrod, Barbara ^a   Roose, Steven P ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846456235     PISSN: 00030651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00030651060540040103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. ALTMAN, D.G. (1996). Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. British Medical Journal 313:570-571.
2. ANDERSON, E.M., & LAMBERT, M.J. (1995). Short-term dynamically oriented psychotherapy: A review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 15:503-514.
3. BERGIN, A.E., & GARFIELD, S.L., EDS. (1994). Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. 4th ed. New York: Wiley.
4. BLATT, S.J. (2001). The effort to identify empirically supported psychological treatments and its implications for clinical research, practice, and training: Commentary on papers by Lester Luborsky and Hans H. Strupp. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 11:635-646.
5. CHAMBLESS, D.L., SANDERSON, W.C., SHOHAM, V., BENNETT JOHNSON, S., POPE, K.S., CRITS-CHRISTOPH, P., ET AL. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. Clinical Psychologist 49:5-18.
6. COCHRANE DATABASE (2001). CCDAN Quality of Research Scale. http://web1.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iop/ccdan/index.htm
7. CRITS-CHRISTOPH, P. (1992). The efficacy of brief dynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry 149:151-158.
8. DOWNS, S.H., & BLACK, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 52:377-384.
9. FONAGY, P., JONES, B.E., KACHELE, H., KRAUSE, R., CLARKIN, J., PERRON, R., ET AL. (2001). An Open Door Review of Outcome Studies in Psychoanalysis. 2nd ed. London: International Psychoanalytical Association.
10. _ ROTH, A., & HIGGITT, A. (2005). The outcome of psychodynamic psychotherapy for psychological disorders. Clinical Neuroscience Research 4:367-377.
11. GABBARD, G.O., GUNDERSON, J.G., & FONAGY, P. (2002). The place of psychoanalytic treatments within psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry 59:505-510.
12. GREEN, A. (2000). What kind of research for psychoanalysis? In Clinical and Observational Psychoanalytic Research: Roots of a Controversy, ed. J. Sandler, A.-M. Sandler, & R. Davies. Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 21-26.
13. JADAD, A. (1998). Randomised Controlled Trials. London: BMJ Books.
14. LACKNER, J.M., MESMER, C., MORLEY, S., DOWZER, C., & HAMILTON, S. (2004). Psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 72:1100-1113.
15. LEICHSENRING, F. (2001). Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depression: A meta-analytic approach. Clinical Psychology Review 121:401-419.
16. _ (2005). Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? A review of empirical data. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86:841-868.
17. _ & LEIBING, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry 160:1223-1232.
18. _ RABUNG, S., & LEIBING, E. (2004). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry 61:1208-1216.
19. LEUZINGER-BOHLEBER, M., & TARGET, M., EDS. (2002). Outcomes of Psychoanalytic Treatment: Perspectives for Therapists and Researchers. New York: Whurr.
20. LUBORSKY, L. (2001). The meaning of empirically supported treatment research for psychoanalytic and other long-term therapies. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 11:583-604.
21. NORCROSS, J.C. (2001). Empirically supported therapy relationships: Summary report of the Division 29 task force. Psychotherapy 38.
22. SAFRAN, J.D., & ARON, L. (2001). Symposium on implications of the empirically supported treatment controversy for psychoanalysis: Introduction. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 11:571-582.
23. SHAPIRO, D.A., & SHAPIRO, D. (1982). Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: A replication and refinement. Psychological Bulletin 92:581-604.
24. SINDHU, F., CARPENTER, L., & SEERS, K. (1997). Development of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a delphi technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25:262-268.
25. STRUPP, H.H. (2001). Implications of the empirically supported treatment movement for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 11:605-620.
26. SVARTBERG, M., & STILES, T.C. (1991). Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 59:704-714.
27. WALLERSTEIN, R.S. (2001). Psychotherapy research and psychoanalytic practice: Commentary on papers by Lester Luborsky and Hans H. Strupp. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 11:621-634.
28. _ (2003). The intertwining of politics and science in psychoanalytic history. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51(Suppl.):7-21.
29. WEISSMAN, M.M., MARKOWITZ, J.C., & KLERMAN, G.L. (2000). Comprehensive Guide to Interpersonal Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
30. WESTEN, D., NOVOTNY, C.M., & THOMPSON-BRENNER, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin 130:631-663.