The implications of survey method for measuring cultivation effects

Human Communication Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 64-80

  Shrum, L J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846433187     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00289.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
2. Bishop, G., Hippler, H., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1988). A comparison of response effects in self-administered and telephone surveys. In R. M. Groves, et al. (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 321-340): New York: Wiley.
3. Busselle, R. W., & Shrum, L. J. (2003). Media exposure and the accessibility of social information. Media Psychology, 5, 255-282.
4. Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5. Churchill, G. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2002). Marketing research: Methodological foundations. Mason, OH: Southwestern.
6. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in the mass public. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: The Free Press.
8. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 182-190.
9. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., & Signorielli, N. (1978). Cultural indicators: Violence profile no. 9. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 176-207.
10. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The 'mainstreaming' of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10-29.
11. Groves, R. M. (1979). Actors and questions in telephone and personal interview surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 190-205.
12. Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. J., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John A. Wiley & Sons.
13. Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1982). Television's influence on constructions of social reality. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (Vol. 2, pp. 224-247). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14. Hirsch, P. (1980). The scary world of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis. Communication Research, 7, 403-456.
15. Holbrook, A. L., Green, M. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: Comparison of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 79-125.
16. Hughes, M. (1980). The fruits of cultivation analysis: A reexamination of some effects of television watching. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 287-302.
17. Jordan, L. A., Marcus, A. C., & Reeder, L. G. (1980). Response styles in telephone and household interviewing: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 210-222.
18. Lichter, S. R., Lichter, L. S., & Rothman, S. (1994). Prime time: How TV portrays American culture. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
19. Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1996). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 1-45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. O'Guinn, T. C., & Shrum, L. J. (1997). The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 278-294.
21. Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.), (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Taylor, D. S. (1988). A methodological examination of cultivation. Communication Research, 15, 107-134.
23. Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348.
24. Schwarz, N., Park, D. C., Knäuper, B., & Sudman, S. (Eds.), (1999). Cognition, aging, and self-reports. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
25. Shanahan, J., & Morgan, M. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Shapiro, M. A. (1991). Memory and decision processes in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18, 3-24.
27. Shrum, L. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22, 482-509.
28. Shrum, L. J. (2001). Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 94-120.
29. Shrum, L. J. (2002). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 69-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Shrum, L. J. (in press). Cultivation and social cognition. In D. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition: Theories and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Shrum, L. J., & Bischak, V. D. (2001). Mainstreaming, resonance, and impersonal impact: Testing moderators of the cultivation effect for estimates of crime risk. Human Communication Research, 27, 187-215.
32. Shrum, L. J., & O'Guinn, T. C. (1993). Processes and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20, 436-471.
33. Shrum, L. J., Wyer, R. S., & O'Guinn, T. C. (1998). The effects of television consumption on social perceptions: The use of priming procedures to investigate psychological processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 447-458.
34. Tarnai, J., & Dillman, D. A. (1992). Questionnaire context as a source of response differences in mail vs. telephone surveys. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Context effects in social and psychological research (pp. 115-129). New York: Springer-Verlag.
35. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
36. Tyler, T. R. (1980). Impact of directly and indirectly experienced events: The origin of crime-related judgments and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 13-28.
37. Tyler, T. R., & Cook, F. L. (1984). The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 693-708.
38. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.