Interconnector economics

Energy Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 13, 2006, Pages 1457-1472

  Turvey, Ralph ^a  

^a Frontier Economics y Barcelona School of Economics   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Interconnector electricity; Investment appraisal; Market splitting; Transmission rights

Indexed keywords

ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS;

INTERCONNECTOR ELECTRICITY; INVESTMENT APPRAISAL; MARKET SPLITTING;

ELECTRIC INDUSTRY;

CONTROL SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY MARKET; INVESTMENT;

EID: 33846426874     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Basslink Joint Advisory Panel, 2002. Final Panel Report on the Basslink Proposal (Chapters 3 and 4).
2. Brunekreeft G. Market-Based Investment in Electricity Transmission Networks. Controllable Flow (2003), Cambridge Department of Economics
3. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER), 2003. Market Arrangements for Electricity-Interconnector Trading Principles An MAE Consultation.
4. DKM Economic Consultants, Economic and Social Research Institute and Electrotec Ireland, 2003, Costs and Benefits of East-West Interconnection between the Republic of Ireland and UK Electricity Systems: Report to the Commission for Energy Regulation.
5. ECON Analyse, 2003. Kraftkabel til England?-samfunnsøkonomisk lønnsomhet.
6. ETSO, 2001a. Definitions of Transfer Capacities in liberalised Electricity Markets.
7. ETSO, 2001b. Co-ordinated Auctioning: A market-based method for transmission capacity allocation in meshed networks.
8. ETSO, 2004. Cross-border electricity exchanges on meshed AC power systems.
9. ETSO and EuroPEX, 2004. Flow-based market coupling.
10. EuroPEX, 2003. Using Implicit Auctions to Manage Cross-Border Congestion: 'Decentralised Market Coupling', Paper by presented at the Tenth Meeting of the European Electricity Regulatory Forum.
11. Frontier economics and Consentec, 2004. Analysis of Cross-Border Congestion Management Methods for the EU Internal Electricity Market, Study conducted for the European Commission Directorate General Energy and Transport.
12. Harvey, S.M., Pope, S.L., Buechler, J.P., Thompson, R.M., 2001. Feasibility Study for a Combined Day-Ahead Market in the Northeast.
13. Institute of Power Systems and Power Technology of Aachen University of Technology and CONSENTEC, 2001. Analysis of Electricity Network Capacities and Identification of Congestion; Final Report.
14. Intelligent Energy Systems, 2000. Application Of The ACCC Regulatory Test To SNI. Report to TransGrid.
15. ISO New England, Inc. and New York ISO, Inc., 2003. Virtual Regional Dispatch Concept, Evaluation, and Proposal a Joint Working Paper.
16. LECG, LLC and KEMA Consulting, Inc., 2001. Feasibility Study for a combined Day Ahead market in the northeast, Study prepared for the ISO-New England, New York ISO, and Ontario IMO.
17. Littlechild, S., 2003. Regulated and Merchant Interconnectors in Australia: SNI and Murraylink Revisited, CMI Project, http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/electricity/.
18. National Grid Company, 2003. Interconnexion France-Angleterre (France-England Interconnector) IFA User Guide Issue 4.1.
19. NERA, 2003. ROI Interface Study An Interim Report for the IME Group.
20. OFREG, 2003. Interconnector Allocation Arrangements 2004-05, Consultation Paper June 2003.
21. RTE, 2004. Détermination des capacités commerciales d'échange et des coûts de congestion associés.
22. Turvey, R., Anderson, D., 1977. Electricity Economics, chapter 18 Cost structure in hydro and hydro-thermal systems.