Dominance, submissivity (and homosexuality) in general population. Testing of evolutionary hypothesis of sadomasochism by internet-trap-method

Neuroendocrinology Letters

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 711-718

  Jozifkova, Eva ^a   Flegr, Jaroslav ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Evolution; Homosexuality; Masochism; Reproduction; Reproduction strategy; Reproductive behavior; Sadism; Sexual behavior; Sociobiology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERNET; MALE; MASOCHISM; MATING SYSTEM; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREVALENCE;

EID: 33846417639     PISSN: 0172780X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington (USA): American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.; 2000.
2. Crawford J, Kippax S, Rodden P, Donohoe S, Van de Ven P. Male Call 96:National telephone surwey of men who have sex with men. Sydney (AU): National Centre in HIV Social Research; 1998.
3. Folstad I, Karter AJ. Parasites, Bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat. 1992; 139:603-22.
4. Freud S. Vybrane spisy II.-III. Prague (CR): Avicenum; 1993.
5. Gebhard PH, Johnson AB. The Kinsey data: marginal tabulations of 1938-1963 interviews conducted by the Institute for sex research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (USA): Indiana University Press; 1998.
6. Grulich A E, De Visser RO, Smith AMA, Rissel CE, Richters J. Sex in Australia: Homosexual experience and recent homosexual encounters. Aust J Public Health. 2003; 27:155-63.
7. Havlicek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J. Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol Let. 2005; 1:256-9.
8. Henley NM. Body politics: Power, sex and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs (USA): Prentice-Hall; 1977.
9. Henley NM. Body politics revisited: What do we know today? In: Kalbfleisch PJ Cody MJ, editors. Gender, power, and communication in human relationships. Hillsdale (USA): Erbaum; 1995. p. 27-61.
10. Janus SS, Janus CL. The Janus report on sexual behavior. New York (USA): John Wiley & Sons; 1993.
11. Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The Social organization of sexuality in the United States. Chicago (USA): University of Chicago Press; 1994.
12. Richters J, Grulich AE, de Vieser RO, Smith AMA, Rissel C E. Sex in Australia: Autoerotic, esoteric and other sexual practices engaged in by a representative sample of adults. Aust J Public Health. 2003; 27:180-90.
13. Sanchez DT, Kiefer AK, Ybarra O. Sexual submissiveness in women: costs for sexual autonomy and arousal. Pers Soc Psych Bull. 2006; 32:512-24.
14. Sandnnabba NK, Santtila P, Alison L, Nordling, N. Demographic, sexual behaviour, family background and abuse experiences of practitioners of sadomasochistic sex: a review of recent research. Sex Relat Ther. 2002; 17:39-55.
15. Smith AMA, Rissel CE, Richters J, Grulich AE, De Visser RO. Sex in Australia: sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience among a representative sample of adults. Aust J Public Health. 2003; 27:138-45.
16. Weinberg MS, Wiliams CJ, Moser C. The social constituents of sadomasochism. Soc Probl. 1984; 31:379-89.
17. Weiss P. Sexualni deviace. Prague (CR): Portal; 2002.
18. Weiss P, Zverina J. Zmena sexualniho chovani Čechů. Vesmir. 2006; 85:29-32.
19. Zahavi A. Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975; 53:205-14.