Application of entropy weight and fuzzy synthetic evaluation in urban ecological security assessment

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1923-1927

  Gao, Changbo ^a,b   Chen, Xingeng ^b   Wei, Chaohai ^c   Peng, Xiaochun ^d  

^a GUANGDONG INDUSTRY TECHNICAL COLLEGE   (China)

^b SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d SOUTH CHINA INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Ecological security assessment; Entropy weight; Fuzzy; Urban

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; URBAN ECOSYSTEM;

ARTICLE; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EVALUATION; FUZZY LOGIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FUZZY LOGIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

ASIA; BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; GUANGDONG; GUANGZHOU; JIANGSU; SHANGHAI; SHENZHEN; SUZHOU;

EID: 33846415484     PISSN: 10019332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alcamo J, Endejan MB, Kaspar F, et al. 2001. The GLASS model: A strategy for quantifying global environmental security. Environ Sci Policy, 4: 1-12
2. Barnthouse LW. 1992. The role of models in ecological risk assessment: A 1990's perspective. Environ Toxicol Chem, 11: 1751-1760
3. Can H, Hu F, Li H-X, et al. 2002. Evaluation of sustainable development of urban ecosystem in Nanjing City. Acta Ecol Sin, 22(5): 787-792 (in Chinese)
4. Chen D-J, Xu Z-M. 2002. Study on assessment of the ecological security in the continental watersheds in northwest China - A case study at the middle reaches of Heihe River watershed, Zhangye prefecture. Arid Land Geogr, 25 (3): 219-224 (in Chinese)
5. Chen G-J. 2002. On ecological security. Chongqing Environ Sci, 24(3): 1-3 (in Chinese)
6. Cui S-H, Hong H-S, Huang Y-F, et al. 2005. Progress of the ecological security research. Acta Ecol Sin, 25(4): 861-868 (in Chinese)
7. Guo X-R, Yang J-R, Mao X-Q. 2002. Primary studies on urban ecosystem health assessment. China Environ Sci, 22 (6): 525-529 (in Chinese)
8. Hammond A, Adriaanse A, Rodenburg E, et al. 1995. Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance ih the Context of Sustainable Development. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
9. Hu Z-B, Xu J-M, Quan W-M. 2002. Application of fuzzy evaluation method on assessing lake eutrophication. Agro-Environ Prot, 21(6): 535-536 (in Chinese)
10. Jia L-Q, Ouyang Z-Y, Zhao T-Q, et al. 2004. Ecological security assessment of an urban ecosystem. Ecol Environ, 13(4): 592-596 (in Chinese)
11. Kullenberg G. 2002. Regional co-development and security. A comprehensive approach. Ocean Coastal Manage, 45: 761-776
12. Kwak SJ, Yoo SH, Shin CH. 2002. A multi-attribute index for assessing environmental impacts of regional development projects: The case study of Korea. Environ Manage, 29: 301-309
13. Pan F, Fu Q, Liang C. 2002. Applying fuzzy synthesize judgment in the study of water environment quality evaluation. Environ Eng, 20(2): 58-61 (in Chinese)
14. Qiu Y-H. 2002. Management Decision and Applied Entropy. Beijing: China Machine Press. 193-196 (in Chinese)
15. Qü G-P. 2002. The problems of ecological environmental have become a popular object of country safety. Environ Prot, (5): 3-5 (in Chinese)
16. Song Y-C, Qi R-H, You W-H, et al. 1999. A study on indices system and assessment criterion of eco-city. Urban Environ Urban Ecol, 12(5): 16-19 (in Chinese)
17. Tran LT, Knight CG, O'Nell RV, et al. 2002. Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the mid-Atlantic region. Environ Manage, 29: 845-859
18. Wang G-X, Cheng G-D, Qian J. 2003. Several problems in ecological security assessment research. Chin J Appl Ecol, 14(9): 1551-1556 (in Chinese)
19. Wu G-Q. 2001. Study on ecological safety and its evaluation of agricultural sustainable development. J Nat Resour, 16(3): 227-233 (in Chinese)
20. Wu K-Y, Sun S-Q, Nie L. 2004. Grey associative analysis for assessment of ecological security. J Anhui Agric Univ, 31(3): 368-371 (in Chinese)
21. Wu Q, Wang R-S, Li H-Q, et al. 2005. The indices and the evaluation method of eco-city. Acta Ecol Sin, 25(8): 2090-2095 (in Chinese)
22. Xiao D-N, Chen W-B, Guo F-L. 2002. On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security. Chin J Appl Ecol, 13(3): 354-358 (in Chinese)
23. Xiao R-B, Ouyang Z-Y, Han Y-S, et al. 2004. Ecological security assessment of Hainan Island. J Nat Resour, 19(6): 769-775 (in Chinese)
24. Xie H-L, Li B. 2004. A study on indices system and assessment criterion of ecological security for city. J Beijing Nor Univ (Nat Sci), 40 (5): 705-710 (in Chinese)
25. Zhou W-H, Wang R-S. 2005. Methodology assessment of urban ecological security: A case study of Beijing. Chin J Ecol, 24(7): 848-852 (in Chinese)
26. Zou C-X, Shen W-S. 2003. Advances in ecological security. Rural Eco-Environ, 19(1): 56-59 (in Chinese)
27. Zhou Z-H, Sun J-N, Ren G-P. 2005. Study and application on the entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Acta Sci Circ, 25(4): 552-555 (in Chinese)
28. Zuo W, Wang Q, Wang W-J, et al. 2002. Study on regional ecological security assessment index and standard. Geogr Terri Res, 18(1): 67-71 (in Chinese)