Evaluation of vascular complications of pancreas transplantation with high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography

Radiology

Volumn 242, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 590-599

  Hagspiel, Klaus D ^a   Nandalur, Kiran ^a   Pruett, Timothy L ^a   Leung, Daniel A ^a   Angle, J Fritz ^a   Spinosa, David J ^a   Matsumoto, Alan H ^a   Ahmed, Hossam ^a   Sanfey, Hilary A ^a   Sawyer, Robert G ^a   Burkholder, Brian ^a   Brayman, Kenneth L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVALUATION; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; GRAFT OCCLUSION; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENOSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VASCULAR DISEASE; VEIN THROMBOSIS;

ADULT; ANEURYSM, FALSE; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GADOLINIUM DTPA; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS; VASCULAR DISEASES; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

EID: 33846406386     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2422041261     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Eubank WB, Schmiedl UP, Levy AE, Marsh CL. Venous thrombosis and occlusion after pancreas transplantation: evaluation with breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:381-385.
2. Grewal HP, Garland L, Novalk K, et al. Risk factors for postimplantation pancreatitis and pancreatic thrombosis in pancreas transplant recipients. Transplantation 1993;56:609-612.
3. Douzdjian V, Abecassis MM, Cooper JL, et al. Pancreas transplant salvage after acute venous thrombosis. Transplantation 1993;56:222-223.
4. Krebs TL, Daly B, Wong JJ, Chow CC, Bartlett ST. Vascular complications of pancreatic transplantation: MR evaluation. Radiology 1995;196:793-798.
5. Orsenigo E, De Corbelli F, Salvioni M, et al. Successful endovascular treatment for gastrodnodenal artery pseudoaneurysm with an arteriovenous fistula after pancreas transplantation. Transpl Int 2003;16:694-696.
6. Woo EY, Milner R, Brayman KL, Fairman RM. Successful PTA and stenting for acute iliac arterial injury following pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003;3:85-87.
7. Tan M, Di Carlo A, Stein A, Cantarovick M, Tchervenkov JI, Metrakos P. Pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery after pancreas transplantation treated by endovascular stenting. Transplantation 2001;72:336-338.
8. Tzakis AG, Carroll PB, Gordon RD, Yokoyama I, Makowka L, Starzl TE. Arterial mycotic aneurysm and rupture: a potentially fatal complication of pancreas transplantation in diabetes mellitus. Arch Surg 1989;124:660-661.
9. Yuh WT, Hunsicker LG, Nghiem DD, et al. Pancreatic transplants: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;170:171-177.
10. Krebs TL, Daly B, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Carroll K, Bartlett ST. Acute pancreatic transplant rejection: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging compared with histopathologic analysis. Radiology 1999;210:437-442.
11. Moulton JS, Munda R, Weiss MA, Lubbers DJ. Pancreatic transplants: CT with clinical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989;172:21-26.
12. Wong JJ, Krebs TL, Klassen DK, et al. Sonographic evaluation of acute pancreatic transplant rejection: morphology-Doppler analysis versus guided percutaneous biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:803-807.
13. Nelson NL, Largen PS, Stratta RJ, et al. Pancreas allograft rejection: correlation of transduodenal core biopsy with Doppler resistive index. Radiology 1996;200:91-94.
14. Huber A, Holzknecht N, Heuck A, Stangl M, Reiser M. Erste erfahrungen mit der kontrastverstärkten MR-angiographie nach nieren- und pankreastransplantation. Radiologe 1997;37:239-242.
15. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
16. Neri E, Cappelli C, Boggi U, Salvatori L, et al. Multirow CT in the follow-up of pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 2004;36:597-600.
17. Heyneman LE, Keogan MT, Tuttle-Newhall JE, et al. Pancreatic transplantation using portal venous and enteric drainage: the post-operative appearance of a new surgical procedure. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:283-290.
18. Gaber AO, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Hathaway DK, et al. Results of pancreas transplantation with portal venous and enteric drainage. Ann Surg 1995;221:613-614.
19. Bloom RD, Olivares M, Rehman L, Raja RM, Yang S, Badosa F. Long-term pancreas allograft outcome in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a comparison of enteric and bladder drainage. Transplantation 1997;64:1689-1693.
20. Boeve WJ, Kok T, Tegzess AM, et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced, MR-angiography-MRI and digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of pancreas and/or kidney transplantation patients: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:595-607.
21. Fernandez MP, Bernardino ME, Neylan JF, Olson RA. Diagnosis of pancreatic transplant dysfunction: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:1171-1176.
22. Foshager MC, Hedlund LJ, Troppmann C, Beneditti E, Gruessner RW. Venous thrombosis of pancreatic transplants: diagnosis of duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1269-1273.
23. Tobben PJ, Zajko AB, Sumkin JH, et al. Pseudoaneurysms complicating organ transplantation: roles of CT, duplex sonography, arid angiography. Radiology 1988;169:65-70.
24. Nikolaidis P, Amin RS, Hwang CM, et al. Role of sonography in pancreatic transplantation. RadioGraphics 2003;23:939-949.
25. Klassen DK, Weir MR, Cangro CB, Bartlett ST, Papadimitriou JC, Drachenberg CB. Pancreas allograft biopsy: safety of percutaneous biopsy-results of a large experience. Transplantation 2002;73:553-555.
26. Cappelli C, Neri E, Boggi U, et al. Pancreas transplantation: multislice computed tomography follow-up. Radiol Med (Torino) 2003;106:191-200.
27. Eschwege P, Rocher L, Rondeau Y, et al. Complications of pancreas transplantation: radiological evaluation. Transplant Proc 1998;30:2795.
28. van der Hem LG, van der Linden CJ, Ticheler CH, Hoitsma AJ, Corstens FH. Early detection of post-transplant pancreatic graft dysfunction with technetium-99nn-HM-PAO scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 1994;35:1488-1490.
29. Lee HK, Chung DH, Jung J, et al. Three cases of pancreas allograft dysfunction. J Korean Med Sci 2000;15:105-110.
30. Contis JC, O'Connor TP, Holland GA, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of bladder-drained whole pancreaticoduodenal transplants with magnetic resonance angiography. Transplant Proc 1994;26:464-465.
31. Vahey TN, Glazer GM, Francis IR, et al. MR diagnosis of pancreatic transplant rejection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:557-560.
32. Niendorf HP, Haustein J, Louton T, Beck W, Laniado M. Safety and tolerance after intravenous administration of 0.3 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Invest Radiol 1991;26(suppl 1):S221-S223.