Effects of cropping system and cultivation pattern on bacterial populations and anti-fusarium wilt bacteria in melon soils

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1937-1940

  Li, Bin ^a,b   Xie, Guanlin ^a   Chen, Ruoxia ^b   Huangfu, Weiguo ^b   Liu, Bo ^c  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Sciences   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

Author keywords

Antagonistic bacteria; Bacterial population; Cropping system; Cultivation pattern; Fusarium wilt

Indexed keywords

ANTIFUNGAL AGENT;

BACTERIUM; CROPPING PRACTICE; CULTIVATION; POPULATION ECOLOGY; SOIL BIOTA; WILT;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; CUCUMBER; FUSARIUM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; PSEUDOMONAS;

ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CUCURBITACEAE; FUSARIUM; PLANT DISEASES; PSEUDOMONAS; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CUCUMIS; FUSARIUM; PSEUDOMONAS;

EID: 33846404929     PISSN: 10019332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ge C-B, Liu B, Zhu Y-J, et al. 2004. Study on the inhibition of antagonistic bacteria, NH-BS-2000 against Fusarium oxysporum in the watermelon. J Xiamen Univ (Nat Sci), 43(1): 87-90 (in Chinese)
2. Jin Y-X, Xie G-L, Sun X-L, et al. 2003. Relationship of garlic rotation and severity of fusarium wilt of melon. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Agric Sci), 21(1): 9-12 (in Chinese)
3. Liang J-G, Zhang B-X, Yu J-Q, et al. 2005. Population fluctuation of main pathogens and their antagonistic bacteria in cucumber rhizosphere. Chin J Appl Ecol, 16(5): 911-914 (in Chinese)
4. Liu B, Zhu Y-J, Zhou H-T, et al. 2004. Review on achievement to fusarium wilt disease in agricultural crops. J Xiamen Univ (Nat Sci), 43(1): 47-58 (in Chinese)
5. Mew TW, Misra JK. 1994. A Manual of Rice Seed Health Testing. Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
6. Nisini PT, Colla G, Granati E, et al. 2002. Rootstock resistance to fusarium wilt and effect on fruit yield and quality of two muskmelon cultivars. Sci Hortic, 93: 281-288
7. Schaad NW, Jone JB, Chun W. 2001. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. St. Paul: American Phytopahological Society.
8. 3 from rhizosphere of cucumber. Chin J Appl Ecol, 14 (9): 1521-1524 (in Chinese)
9. Soad AA, Xie G-L, Li B, et al. 2004. Comparative performance of Bacillus spp. in growth promotion and suppression of tomato bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci), 30(4): 54-61 (in Chinese)
10. Traka-Mavrona E, Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Pritsa T. 2000. Response of squash (Cucurbita spp.) as rootstock for melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sci Hortic, 83: 353-362
11. Wang K-Z, Xiao C-C, Kong D-Y, et al. 2005. Dynamic chances of rhizobacteria in tomato field. J Southwest Agric Unit (Nat Sci), 27(2): 169-172 (in Chinese)
12. Wang R-H, Zhou B-L, Zhang Q-F, et al. 2005. Effects of grafting on rhizosphere microbial populations of eggplants. Acta Hortic Sin, 32(1): 124-126 (in Chinese)
13. Xie GL, Soad A, Swing J, et al. 2003. Diversity of gram negative bacteria antagonistic against major pathogens of rice from rice seed in the tropic environment. J Zhejiang Univ Sci, 4: 463-468
14. Yin R, Zhang H-Y, Huang J-F, et al. 2004. Comparison of microbiological properties between soils of rice-wheat rotation and vegetable cultivation. Plant Nutr Fertil Sci, 10(1): 57-62 (in Chinese)
15. Zhang R-Y, Tan Z-Q, Jian R-M. 1998. Screening and identification of some bacterial isolates for biocontrolling anthracnose diseases of mango. Chin J Trop Crops, 19(3): 21-27 (in Chinese)