Bayesian analysis of latent variable models with non-ignorable missing outcomes from exponential family

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 681-693

  Song, Xin Yuan ^a   Lee, Sik Yum ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bayes factor; Bayesian analysis; Latent variable models; Metropolis Hastings algorithm; Path sampling; Posterior simulation

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHINESE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG INFORMATION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNSPECIFIED SIDE EFFECT;

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BAYES THEOREM; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; LOGISTIC MODELS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE;

EID: 33846403783     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2530     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Czajkowski SM, Margaret AC, Ashley WS. Adherence and the placebo effect. In The Handbook of Health Behavior Change (2nd edn), Sally AS, Eleanor BS, Judith KO, Wendy LM (eds). Springer: New York, 1998; 513-534.
2. Rand CS, Kathleen W. Measuring adherence with medication regiments in clinical care and research. In The Handbook of Health Behavior change (2nd edn), Sally AS, Eleanor BS, Judith KO, Wendy LM (eds). Springer: New York, 1998; 71-103.
3. Andre T, Lynda B. Knowledge of acquired immune deficiency syndrome and sexual responsibility among high school students. Youth and Society 1991; 22:339-361.
4. DiMatteo MR, Heidi SL. Promoting adherence to courses of treatment: mutual collaboration in the physician-patient relationship. In Health Communication Research: A Guide to Developments and Directions, Lorraine DJ, Bernard KD (eds). Greenwood: Westport, CT, 1998; 71-98.
5. Chan GMC. The effects of treatment compliance on clinical outcomes, in patients with chronic diseases. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001.
6. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley: New York, 1987.
7. Lawly DN, Maxwell AE. Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method (2nd edn). Elsevier: New York, 1971.
8. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLISM Command Language. Scientific Software International: Hove and London, 1996.
9. Bentler PM, Wu EJC. EQS6.0 for Windows User Guide. Multivariate Software, Inc.: Enciuo, CA, 2002.
10. Bentler PM, Stein JA. Structural equation models in medical research. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1992; 1:159-181.
11. Power M, Bullingen M, Hazper A, WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychology 1999; 18(5): 495-505.
12. Pugesek BH, Tomer A, von Eye A. Structural Equation Modeling Applications in Ecological and Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge University Press: New York, 2003.
13. Sammel MD, Ryan LM. Latent variable models with fixed effects. Biometrics 1996; 52:220-243.
14. Moustaki I. A general class of latent variable models for ordinal manifest variables with covariate effects on the manifest and latent variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2003; 56:337-357.
15. Schumacker RE, Marcoulides GA. Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: Mahwah, NJ, 1998.
16. Wall MM, Amemiya Y. Estimation for polynomial structural equation models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000; 95:929-940.
17. Dunson DB. Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2000; 62:355-366.
18. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika 2004; 167-190.
19. Lee SY, Song XY. Bayesian model comparison of nonlinear latent variable models with missing continuous and ordinal categorical data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2004; 57:131-150.
20. Lee SY, Tang NS. Statistical analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with nonignorable missing data. Psychometrika 2006, in press.
21. Ansari A, Jedidi K. Bayesian factor analysis for multilevel binary observations. Psychometrika 2000; 65: 475-498.
22. Lee SY, Song XY. Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2004; 39:653-686.
23. Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1984; 6:721-741.
24. Gelman A, Meng XL. Simulating normalizing constant: from importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling. Statistical Science 1998; 13:163-185.
25. Sammel MD, Ryan LM, Legler JM. Latent variable models for mixed discrete and continuous outcomes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1997; 59:667-578.
26. Lee SY, Song XY. Model comparison of nonlinear latent variables models with fixed covariates. Psychometrika 2003; 68:27-47.
27. Chib S, Greenberg E. Analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika 1998; 85:347-361.
28. Shi JQ, Lee SY. Latent variable models with mixed continuous and polytomous data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2000; 62:77-87.
29. Lee SY, Song XY. Maximum likelihood analysis of a general latent variable model with hierarchically mixed data. Biometrics 2004; 60:624-636.
30. Ibrahim JG, Chen MH, Lipsitz SR. Missing responses in generalized linear mixed models when the missing data mechanism is nonignorable. Biometrika 2001; 88:551-564.
31. Chen MH, Shao QM, Ibrahim JG. Monte Carlo Methods in Bayesian Computation. Springer: New York, 2000.
32. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machine. Journal of Chemical Physics 1953; 21:1087-1091.
33. Hastings WK. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their application. Biometrika 1970; 57:97-100.
34. Gelman A, Meng XL, Stern H. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica 1996; 6:733-807.
35. Carlin BP, Louis TA. Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall: London, 1996.
36. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995; 90:773-795.