Evaluation of spectral selected press sequence in breast lesion characterization

Chinese Medical Sciences Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 265-269

  Lu, Hong ^a   Liu, Pei Fang ^a   Bao, Run Xian ^a   Sun, Fei ^b  

^a TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GE HEALTHCARE   (China)

Author keywords

Breast lesion; Choline; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Pathology; Spetral selected point resolved spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST LESION; CANCER SIZE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPECTRAL SELECTED POINT RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY; SPECTROSCOPY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CHOLINE; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33846401064     PISSN: 10019294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Katz-Brull R, Lavin PT, Lenkinski RE. Clinical utility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in characterizing breast lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:1197-203.
2. Harms SE. Technical report of the international working group on breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaing 1999; 10:979-1015.
3. Negendank W. Studies of human tumors by MRS: a review. NMR Biomed 1992; 5:303-24.
4. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo-FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-81.
5. Yen YF, Han KF, Daniel BL, et al. Dynamic breast MRI with spiral trajectories: 3D versus 2D. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:351-9.
6. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Livolsi VA, et al. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-93.
7. Brinck U, Fischer U, Korabiowska W, et al. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1331-4.
8. Griffestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjosne HE, et al. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography. J Megn Reson Imaging 1994; 4:477-80.
9. Cheng LL, Chang IW, Smith BL, et al. Evaluating human breast ductal carcimomas with high-resolution magic-angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 1998; 135:194-202.
10. Kvistad KA, Bakken IJ, Gribbestad IS, et al. Characterization of neoplastic and normal human breast tissues with in vivo (1) H MR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:159-64.
11. 1H spectroscopy-a pilot study at 4T. Radiology 2004; 233:424-31.
12. Jagannathan NR, Kumar M, Seenu V, et al. Evaluation of total choline from in-vivo volume localized proton MR spectroscopy and its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2001; 84:1016-22.
13. Fei S, Hong L, Cao G. Comprison of spectral spatial PRESS with TE averaged PRESS in breast choline detection: proceedings of ISMRM 2006, Seattle. 1755.
14. Zhao B, Cai SF, Yu TF, et al. Study of clinical value and influencing factors of 1H-MR spectroscopy in mammary tumors. Chin J Radiol 2006; 40:281-4.
15. Roebuck JR, Cecil KM, Schnall MD, et al. Human breast lesions: characterization with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1998; 209:269-75.
16. Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast cancer diagnosis: preliminary study. Radiology 2006; 239:686-92.
17. Cecil KM, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al. The evaluation of human breast lesions with magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 68:45-54.
18. Tse GM, Cheung HS, Pang LM, et al. Characterization of lesions of the breast with proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of carcinomas, benign lesions, and phyllodes tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181:1267-72.