Conspiracy in international law

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 341-357

  Meierhenrich, Jens ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Criminal organization; International courts and tribunals; Joint criminal enterprise

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846382068     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.050306.102350     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Barrett R, Little LE. 2003. Lessons of Yugoslav rape trials: a role of conspiracy law in international tribunals. Minn. Law Rev. 88:30-85
2. Bernays MC. 1982 (1944). Trial of European war criminals (by Colonel Murray C. Bernays, G-1). In The American Road to Nuremberg: The Documentary Record 1944-1945, ed. BF Smith, pp. 33-37. Stanford, CA: Hoover Inst. Press
3. Burke JA, Kadish S. 1983. Conspiracy. In Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, ed. SH Kadish, 1:23138. New York: Free Press
4. Callanan v. U.S., 364 U.S. 587 (1961)
5. Danner AM, Martinez JS. 2005. Guilty associations: joint criminal enterprise, command responsibility, and the development of international criminal law. Calif. Law Rev. 93:75-169
6. Davis BA, Vitullo J. 2001. Federal criminal conspiracy. Am. Crim. Law Rev. 38:777-17
7. Drumbl MA. 2005. Pluralizing international criminal justice. Mich. Law Rev. 99:1295-328
8. Eser A. 2002. Individual criminal responsibility. In The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, ed. A Cassese, P Gaeta, JRWD Jones, 1:767-822. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
9. Findlay M. 2001. Synthesis in trial procedures? The experience of international criminal tribunals. Int. Comp. Law Q. 50:26-53
10. Fletcher GP. 2002. Romantics at War: Glory and Guilt in the Age of Terrorism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
11. Haberer E. 2005. History and justice: paradigms of the prosecution of Nazi crimes. Holocaust Genocide Stud. 19:487-519
12. Hagan J. 2003. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Criminals in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
13. Hoskins RJ. 1973. A comparative analysis of the crime of conspiracy in Germany, France, and the United States. NY Univ. J. Int. Law Polit. 6:245-70
14. Ickler NL. 1983. Conspiracy to violate RICO: expanding traditional conspiracy law. Notre Dame Law Rev. 58:587-615
15. IMT. 1947a. Charter of the International Military Tribunal. In Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, 1:10-16. Nuremberg: IMT
16. IMT. 1947b. Judgment. In Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, 1:171-364. Nuremberg: IMT
17. IMT. 1947c. Proc., 20 Feb. 1946-7 March 1946. In Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, 8:1-630. Nuremberg: IMT
18. Johnson PE. 1973. The unnecessary crime of conspiracy. Calif Law Rev. 61:1137-88
19. Jørgensen NHB. 2000. The Responsibility of States for International Crimes. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
20. Katyal NK. 2003. Conspiracy theory. Yale Law J. 112:1307-99
21. Kornhauser LA. 1982. An economic analysis of the choice between enterprise and personal liability for accidents. Calif Law Rev. 70:1345-92
22. Krulewich v. U.S., 336 U.S. 445-447 (1949) (J. Jackson concurring)
23. Kutz C. 2000. Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
24. Mastin YM. 2001. RICO conspiracy: dismantles the Mexican mafia and disables procedural due process. William Mitchell Law Rev. 27:2295-344
25. Meierhenrich J. 2005. The concept of "criminal organization" in international law: a reconstruction. Work. Pap., Dep. Gov., Harvard Univ.
26. Meierhenrich J. 2006. A question of guilt. Ratio Juris 19:314-42
27. Meron T. 2004. Procedural evolution in the ICTY. J. Int. Crim. Justice 2:520-25
28. Mettraux G. 2005. International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
29. Osiel M. 2005. The banality of good: aligning incentives against mass atrocity. Columbia Law Rev. 105:1751-862
30. Pinkerton v. U.S., 328 U.S. 640 (1946)
31. Pomorski S. 1990. Conspiracy and criminal organization. In The Nuremberg Trial and International Law, ed. G Ginsburgs, VN Kudriavtsev, pp. 213-48. The Hague: Kluwer
32. Powles S. 2004. Joint criminal enterprise: criminal liability by prosecutorial ingenuity and judicial creativity? J. Int. Crim. Justice 2:606-19
33. Prosecutor v. Anto Furundžija. 2000. Case No. IT-95-17/1 -A, July 21. ICTY Appeals Chamber. Judgment
34. Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić. 1999. Case No. IT-94-1-A, July 15. ICTY Appeals Chamber. Judgment
35. Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović, Nikola Šainović and Dragoljub Ojdanić. 2003a. Case No. IT-99-37-AR72, May 21. ICTY Appeals Chamber. Separate Opinion of Judge David Hunt on Challenge by Ojdanić to Jurisdiction-Joint Criminal Enterprise
36. Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović, Nikola Šainović and Dragoljub Ojdanić. 2003b. Case No. IT-99-37-AR72, May 21. ICTY Appeals Chamber. Decision on Dragoljub Ojdanić's Motion Challenging Jurisdiction - Joint Criminal Enterprise
37. Prosecutor v. Milomir Stakić. 2003. Case No. IT-97-24-T, July 31. ICTY Trial Chamber. Judgment
38. Prosecutor v. Mitar Vasiljević. 2004. Case No. IT-98-32-A, Feb. 25. ICTY Appeals Chamber. Judgment
39. Saltzman A. 1983. Vicarious liability. In Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, ed. SH Kadish, 4:1597-600. New York: Free Press
40. Sayre FB. 1922. Criminal conspiracy. Harvard Law Rev. 35:393-427
41. Schkade D, Sunstein CR, Kahneman D. 2000. Deliberating about dollars: the severity shift. Columbia Law Rev. 100: 1139-75
42. Slaughter A-M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
43. Sykes AO. 1984. The economics of vicarious liability. Yale Law J. 93:1231-80
44. Taylor T. 1992. The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir. New York: Knopf
45. UN War Crimes Comm. 1948. History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the Development of the Laws of War. London: HMSO
46. UN War Crimes Comm. 1949. Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. 15. London: HMSO
47. U.S. v. Falcone, 109 F.2d 579 (1940)
48. U.S. v. Rabinowich, 238 U.S. 78 (1915)
49. U.S. v. Recio, 123 S.Ct. 819 (2003)
50. Wolff D. 1995. The frontier of RICO standing: interpreting RICO's conspiracy provision to realize Congress' goal of creating a powerful crime-fighting weapon. J. Legis. 21:147-54