Search for the electron electric dipole moment

AIP Conference Proceedings

Volumn 842, Issue , 2006, Pages 759-767

  Demille, D ^a   Bickman, S ^a   Hamilton, P ^a   Jiang, Y ^a   Prasad, V ^a   Kawall, D ^b   Paolino, R ^c  

^a Yale University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c U S COAST GUARD ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

CP violation; Electric dipole moments; Precision measurements

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846375757     PISSN: 0094243X     EISSN: 15517616     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2220376     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. See e.g. I.B. Khriplovioh and S.K. Lamoreaux, CP violation without strangeness: electric dipole moments of particles, atoms, and molecules, Springer: New York, 1997.
2. M.E. Pospelov and I.E. Khriplovioh, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 53, 638 (1991).
3. A. Hooker et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 21, 225 (2001).
4. P. Huet and E. Sather, Phys. Rev. D 51, 379 (1995).
5. W. Maroiano, Phys. Rev. D 60, 093006 (1999).
6. A. Raspereza, www.arxiv.org hep-ex/0209021.
7. B.Regan, E. Commins, C. Schmidt, and D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 071805 (2002);
8. E. Commins, S. Ross, D. DeMille, and B. Regan, Phys. Rev. A 50, 2960 (1994);
9. K. Abdullah, C. Carlberg, E. Commins, H. Gould, and S. Ross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2347 (1990).
10. See e.g. G.L. Kane, in Perspectives on Supersymmetry, edited by G. Kane, World Scientific: Singapore, 1998, p. xv;
11. F. Wilczek, Int. J. Mod Phys. A 13, 863 (1998);
12. J.H. Schwarz and N. Seiberg, Rev. Mod Phys. 71, S112 (1999);
13. J. Ellis, Phys. World 7, 31 (1994).
14. For a recent review, see: S. Abel, S. Khalil, and O. Lebedev, Nucl. Phys. B 606, 151 (2001).
15. We thank S. Barr for his summary of the recent theoretical trends regarding the CP problem in SUSY.
16. M. Suzuki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 313 (1991).
17. S. Barr, Int J. Mod. Phys. A 8, 209 (1993).
18. For a recent review, see N. Fortson, P. Sandars, and S. Barr, Phys. Today 56, 33 (2003).
19. ext) and appropriate references are tabulated in Ref. [7].
20. J.M. Amini, C.T. Munger Jr., and H. Gould, www.arxiv.org physios/0602011.
21. D. Weiss (private communication);
22. Heinzen (private communication).
23. S.K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. A 66, 022109 (2002);
24. C.Y. Liu and S.K. Lamoreaux, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 1235 (2004);
25. B.J. Heidenreioh et at, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 253004 (2005).
26. For a review of P- and T-odd effects in molecules, see M. Kozlov and L. Labzowsky, J. Phys. B 28, 1933 (1995).
27. J.J. Hudson, B.E. Sauer, M.R. Tarbutt, and E.A. Hinds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 023003 (2002).
28. J.J. Hudson, B.E. Sauer, M.R. Tarbutt, and E.A. Hinds (private communication).
29. E. Cornell (private communication);
30. N. Shafer-Ray (private communication).
31. D. DeMille, F. Bay, S. Bickman, D. Kawall, D. Krause, S. Maxwell, and L. Hunter, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052507 (2000).
32. D. DeMille et al., in: Art and Symmetry in Experimental Physics, edited by D. Budker, P. Bucksbaum, and S. Freedman, AIP Conf. Proc. 596, Melville, New York, g2001, p. 72.
33. This was first suggested in: V. Flambaum, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Inst. of Nuol. Phys., Novosibirsk, Russia, 1987;
34. see also: L. Barkov, M. Zolotorev, and D. Melik-Pashaev, Sov. J. Quant. Electr. 19, 710 (1988).
35. There are two calculations of the internal electric field in PbO, which differ by a factor of ∼2. See: M. Kozlov and D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 133001 (2002),
36. and A.N. Petrov et al., Phys. Rev. A 72, 022505 (2005).
37. F. Martin et. al., Spectrochim. Acta 44A, 889 (1988).
38. D. Kawall, F. Bay, S. Bickman, Y. Jiang, and D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 133007 (2004).
39. S. Biokman and D. DeMille, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 113101 (2005).