Quantitative analysis of convective dose in hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration: "Predilution" vs. "postdilution" reinfusion

Hemodialysis International

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 76-85

  Colussi, Giacomo ^a   Frattini, Gianmaria ^a  

^a OSPEDALE DI CIRCOLO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Convection; Convective efficiency; Hemodiafiltration; Hemofiltration; Uremic toxin removal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DILUTION; HEMATOCRIT; HEMOCONCENTRATION; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HEMOFILTRATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NOMOGRAM; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER FLOW; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

DIALYSIS SOLUTIONS; HEMATOCRIT; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HEMOFILTRATION; HUMANS; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; WATER;

EID: 33846359697     PISSN: 14927535     EISSN: 15424758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2007.00157.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Depner T, Garred L. Solute transport mechanisms in dialysis. In: Horl WH, Koch KM, Lindsay RM, Ronco C, Winchester JF eds. Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis. Dordrecht, NL: Kluver Academic Publishers; 2004: 73-93.
2. Ladebo I. Principles and practice of hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration. Artif Organs. 1998; 22: 20-25.
3. Colton CK, Smith KA, Merril EW, Friedman S. Diffusion of urea in flowing blood. Ann Inst Chem Eng J. 1971; 17: 800-801.
4. Pedrini LA, De Cristofaro V, Pagliari B, SamàF. Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemofiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes. Kidney Int. 2000; 58: 2155-2165.
5. Jenkins RD, Funk JE, Chen B, Golper T. Operational instability in extracorporeal filtration of blood. Blood Purif. 1992; 10: 292-297.
6. Baldamus AC. Problems in hemofiltration. Contrib Nephrol. 1985; 44: 212-222.
7. 2-microglobulin during predilutional and postdilutional hemofiltration. Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 2331-2337.
8. Ahrenholz P, Winkler RE, Ramlow W, Tiess M, Muller W. On-line hemodiafiltration with pre-and postdilution: A comparison of efficacy. Int J Artif Organs. 1997; 20: 81-90.
9. Canaud B, Morena H, Leray-Moragues H, Chalabi L, Cristol JP. Overview of clinical studies in hemodiafiltration: What do we need now? Hemodial Int. 2006; 10(Suppl 1):5-12.
10. Pozzoni P, Di Filippo S, Manzoni C, Locatelli F. The relevance of convection in clinical practice: A critical review of the literature. Hemodial Int. 2006; 10(Suppl 1):33-38.
11. Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK, Carrol CE, et al. Effect of dialysis membranes and middle molecule removal on chronic hemodialysis patient survival. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 33: 349-355.
12. Canaud B, Bragg-Gresham JL, Marshall ML, et al. Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2006; 69: 2087-2092.
13. Mandolfo S, Corsi A, Wratten ML, Sereni L, Imbasciati E. Evaluation of hygiene and safety controls for on-line paired hemodiafiltration (PHF). Int J Artif Organs. 2006; 29: 160-165.
14. Simmons EM, Weathersby BB, Golper TA, Collins AJ. High-flux, high-efficiency procedures. In: Henrich WL. ed Principles and Practice of Dialysis. 3rd ed. Phyladelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004: 128-136.
15. Vanholder R, De Smet R, Glorieux G, et al. Zidek W and for the European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox). Review on uremic toxins: Classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int. 2003; 63: 1934-1943.
16. Locatelli F, Di Filippo S, Manzoni C. Removal of small and middle molecules by convective techniques. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000; 15(Suppl 2):37-44.
17. David S, Cambi V. Hemofiltration: Predilution vs postdilution. Contrib Nephrol. 1992; 96: 77-85.
18. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA. A nomogram approach to hemodialysis urea modeling. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994; 23: 33-40.