-
3
-
-
33846344148
-
-
Krishnan, A.; Dujardin, E.; Ehbesen, T. W.; Yianilos, P. N.; Treacy, M. M. J. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 55, (14013).
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.55
, Issue.14013
-
-
Krishnan, A.1
Dujardin, E.2
Ehbesen, T.W.3
Yianilos, P.N.4
Treacy, M.M.J.5
-
4
-
-
0034714652
-
-
Reulet, B.; Kasumov, A. Yu.; Kociak, M.; Deblock, R.; Rhodos, I. I.; Gorbatov, Yu. B.; Volkov, V. T.; Journet, C.; Bouchiar, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 2829.
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. Lett
, vol.85
, pp. 2829
-
-
Reulet, B.1
Kasumov, A.Y.2
Kociak, M.3
Deblock, R.4
Rhodos, I.I.5
Gorbatov, Y.B.6
Volkov, V.T.7
Journet, C.8
Bouchiar, H.9
-
5
-
-
9244226568
-
-
LeRoy, B. J.; Lemay, S. G.; Kong, J.; Dekker, C. Nature 2004, 432, 371.
-
(2004)
Nature
, vol.432
, pp. 371
-
-
LeRoy, B.J.1
Lemay, S.G.2
Kong, J.3
Dekker, C.4
-
6
-
-
32644460280
-
-
Sapmaz, S.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Blanter, Ya. M.; Dekker, C.; van der Zant, H. S. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 026801.
-
(2006)
Phys. Rev. Lett
, vol.96
, pp. 026801
-
-
Sapmaz, S.1
Jarillo-Herrero, P.2
Blanter, Y.M.3
Dekker, C.4
van der Zant, H.S.J.5
-
7
-
-
0345119046
-
-
Babić, B.; Furer, J.; Sahoo, S.; Farhangfar, S.; Schönenberger, C. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1577.
-
(2003)
Nano Lett
, vol.3
, pp. 1577
-
-
Babić, B.1
Furer, J.2
Sahoo, S.3
Farhangfar, S.4
Schönenberger, C.5
-
8
-
-
24644469570
-
-
Meyer, J. C.; Paillet, M.; Roth, S. Science 2005, 309, 1539.
-
(2005)
Science
, vol.309
, pp. 1539
-
-
Meyer, J.C.1
Paillet, M.2
Roth, S.3
-
9
-
-
4644252328
-
-
Sazanova, V.; Yaish, Y; Üstünel, H.; Roundy, D.; Arias, T. A.; McEuen, P. L. Nature 2003, 431, 284.
-
(2003)
Nature
, vol.431
, pp. 284
-
-
Sazanova, V.1
Yaish, Y.2
Üstünel, H.3
Roundy, D.4
Arias, T.A.5
McEuen, P.L.6
-
10
-
-
33747791245
-
-
Peng, H. B.; Chang, C. W.; Aloni, S.; Yuzvinsky, T. D.; Zettl, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 087203.
-
(2006)
Phys. Rev. Lett
, vol.97
, pp. 087203
-
-
Peng, H.B.1
Chang, C.W.2
Aloni, S.3
Yuzvinsky, T.D.4
Zettl, A.5
-
11
-
-
0037292815
-
-
Babić, B.; Iqbal, M.; Schönenberger, C. Nanotechnology 2003, 14, 327.
-
(2003)
Nanotechnology
, vol.14
, pp. 327
-
-
Babić, B.1
Iqbal, M.2
Schönenberger, C.3
-
12
-
-
0032578904
-
-
Kong, J.; Soh, H. T.; Cassell, A. M.; Quate, C. F.; Dai, H. Nature 1998, 395, 878.
-
(1998)
Nature
, vol.395
, pp. 878
-
-
Kong, J.1
Soh, H.T.2
Cassell, A.M.3
Quate, C.F.4
Dai, H.5
-
15
-
-
0242675856
-
-
Sapmaz, S.; Blanter, Ya. M.; Gurevich, L.; van der Zant, H. S. J. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 235414.
-
(2003)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.67
, pp. 235414
-
-
Sapmaz, S.1
Blanter, Y.M.2
Gurevich, L.3
van der Zant, H.S.J.4
-
16
-
-
33846399030
-
-
The phase difference φp between the gate and source electrode depends on the frequency of the rf signals, on the (gate dependent) conductance of the nanotube, and on its derivative. Note also that the lock-in detected phase does not contain information about φ
-
The phase difference φp between the gate and source electrode depends on the frequency of the rf signals, on the (gate dependent) conductance of the nanotube, and on its derivative. Note also that the lock-in detected phase does not contain information about φ.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
20844432654
-
-
Postma, H. W. Ch; Kozinsky, I; Husain, A.; Roukes, M. L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 223105.
-
(2005)
Appl. Phys. Lett
, vol.86
, pp. 223105
-
-
Postma, H.W.C.1
Kozinsky, I.2
Husain, A.3
Roukes, M.L.4
-
18
-
-
28844466134
-
-
Lefèvre, R.; Goffman, M. F.; Derycke, V.; Miko, C.; Forró, L.; Bourgoin, J. P.; Hesto, P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 185504.
-
(2005)
Phys. Rev. Lett
, vol.95
, pp. 185504
-
-
Lefèvre, R.1
Goffman, M.F.2
Derycke, V.3
Miko, C.4
Forró, L.5
Bourgoin, J.P.6
Hesto, P.7
-
19
-
-
16244369727
-
-
Üstünel, H; Roundy, D; Arias, T. A. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 523.
-
(2005)
Nano Lett
, vol.5
, pp. 523
-
-
Üstünel, H.1
Roundy, D.2
Arias, T.A.3
-
20
-
-
33846382556
-
-
We neglect corrections in the tension due to the ac motion of the tube. This means that the model is only valid in the linear regime
-
We neglect corrections in the tension due to the ac motion of the tube. This means that the model is only valid in the linear regime.
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
33846338353
-
-
g = -1.7 V. This shift may be explained by a nonzero dc potential on the nanotube due to work function differences between the tube and the metallic electrodes. More research is required to confirm this.
-
g = -1.7 V. This shift may be explained by a nonzero dc potential on the nanotube due to work function differences between the tube and the metallic electrodes. More research is required to confirm this.
-
-
-
|