Taking charge in forest vegetation management

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2357-2363

  Newton, Michael ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFORESTATION; ECOSYSTEMS; REFORESTATION; TIMBER;

FOREST VEGETATION; PRODUCTIVE REGIONS;

VEGETATION;

DEFORESTATION; DEVELOPING WORLD; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; FOREST COVER; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; TIMBER HARVESTING;

DEFORESTATION; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTS; PLANTATIONS; PLANTS; REFORESTATION;

EID: 33846322192     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X06-089     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Angleson, A., and Kaimowitz, D. 2001. Agricultural technologies and deforestation. CABI Publishing and Center for International Forestry Research, New York and Jakarta, Indonesia.
2. Arend, J. 1967. Some variables affecting hardwood control with stem injections of 2,4,5-T. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NC-18.
3. Bramble, W.C., and Byrnes, W.R. 1972. A long-term ecological study of game food and cover on a sprayed utility right-of-way. Res. Bull. 885, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind.
4. Brandeis, T.J., Newton, M., and Cole, E.C. 2001. Underplanted conifer seedling survival and growth in thinned Douglas-fir stands. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 302-312.
5. Brandeis, T.J., Newton, M., and Cole, E.C. 2002. Habitat development in artificially made second-growth Douglas-fir snags. J. Wildl. Manage. 66: 625-633.
6. Chansler, J.F., and Pierce, D.A. 1966. Bark beetle mortalilty in trees injected with cacodylic acid (herbicide). J. Econ. Entomol. 59: 1357-1359.
7. Cleary, B.D., Greaves, R.D., and Hermann, R.K. 1978. Regenerating Oregon's forests. Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis, Oreg.
8. Crouch, G. 1979. Atrazine inproves survival and growth of ponderosa pine threatened by vegetative competition and pocket gophers. For. Sci. 25: 99-111.
9. Drew, T.J., and Flewelling, J.W. 1979. Stand density management: an alternative approach and its application to Douglas-fir plantations. For. Sci. 25: 518-532.
10. Grossnickle, S.C. 2000. Ecophysiology of norther spruce species: the performance of planted seedlings. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ont.
11. Hanson, T.J. 1997. Growth of plantation conifers and whiteleaf manzanita in southwestern Oregon. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University College of Forestry, Corvallis, Oreg.
12. Hermy, M., Verheyen, K., Honnay, O., and Bossuyt, B. 2002. Connecting history with forest composition: lessons from a dark past for an uncertain future. In Popular Summaries: Fourth International Conference on Forest Vegetation Management, 17-21 June 2002, Nancy, France. Edited by H. Frochot, C. Collet, and P. Balandier. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Champenoux, France. pp. 27-33.
13. Heyerdahl, T. 1981. The Tigris Expedition. Doubleday, New York.
14. Hobbs, S.D., Tesch, S.D., Owston, P.W., Stewart, R.E., Tappeiner, J.C., and Wells, G.C. (Editors). 1992. Reforestation practices in southwestern Oregon and northern California. Oregon State University Forest Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oreg.
15. Holt, H.A. 1971 Internal moisture relations of standing Douglas-fir trees injected with organic arsenicals. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University College of Forestry, Corvallis, Oreg.
16. Krefting, L.W., and Hansen, H.L. 1969. Increasing browse for deer by aerial applications of 2,4-D. J. Wildl. Manage. 33: 784-790.
17. Laird, P.P., and Newton, M. 1973. Contrasting effects of two herbicides on invasion by Fomes annosus in tree injection wounds on western hemlock. Plant Dis. Rep. 57: 94-98.
18. Lautenschlager, R.A. 1985. Forestry, herbicides and wildlife. In Is good forestry good wildlife management? Edited by J.A. Bissonette. Maine Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Publ. 689. pp. 299-307.
19. Lavender, D.P., Parish, R, Johnson, C.R., Montgomery, C.R., Vyse, A., Willis, R.A., and Windston, D. 1990. Regenerating British Columbia's forests. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.
20. MacLean, D.A., and Morgan, M.G. 1983. Long-term growth and yield response of young fir to manual and chemical release from shrub competition. For. Chron. 59: 177-183.
21. Maguire, D.A., Kershaw, J.A., and Hann, D.W. 1991. Predicting the effects of silvicultural regime on branch size and crown wood core in Douglas-fir. For. Sci. 37: 1409-1428.
22. McConkey, T.W. 1958. Helicopter spraying with 2,4,5-T to release young white pines. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NE-101.
23. Miller, D.A., and Quigley, T.B. 2004. Introduction: herbicides and forest biodiversity. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 32: 1016-1019.
24. Miller, J.H., Zutter, B.R., Zedaker, S.M., Edwards, M.B., and Newbold, R.A. 2003. Growth and yield relative to competition for loblolly pine plantations to mid-rotation - a southeastern United States regional study. South. J. Appl. For. 27: 232-253.
25. Mueggler, W.F. 1966. Herbicide treatment of browse on a big-game winter range in northern Idaho. J. Wildl. Manage. 20: 141-151.
26. Newton, M. 1967. Vegetation management - system of operation. In Herbicides and vegetation management in forests ranges and noncrop lands. Edited by M. Newton. Oregon State University School of Forestry, Corvallis, Oreg.
27. Newton, M. 1975. Constructive use of herbicides in forest resource management. J. For. 73: 329-336.
28. Newton, M., and Cole, E.C. 1987. A sustained-yield scheme for "old growth" Douglas-fir. West. J. Appl. For. 2: 22-25.
29. Newton, M., and Cole, E.C. 2005. Linkage between riparian buffer features and regeneration, benthic communities and water temperature in headwater streams, western Oregon. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-642. pp. 81-101.
30. Newton, M., and Dost, F.N. 1984. Biological and physical effects of forest vegetation management. Final Report to the State of Washington. Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Wash.
31. Newton, M., and Hanson, T.J. 1998. Bias in estimation of site quality. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Forest Vegetation Management Conference, 20-22 January 1998, Redding, Calif. Chair: S. Gray; Vice-Chair: E. Fredrickson. pp. 78-84.
32. Newton, M., and Holt, H.A. 1971. Scolytid and buprestid mortality in ponderosa pines injected with organic arsenicals. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 952-958.
33. Newton, M., and Smith, R.W. 1976. Injecting and aerial spraying herbicides in Vermont. Northern Logger and Timber Processor, 25: 10-11, 35-37.
34. Newton, M., Cole, E.C., Lautenschlager, R.A. White, D.E., and McCormack, M.L., Jr. 1989. Browse availability after conifer release in Maine's spruce-fir forests. J. Wildl. Manage. 53: 643-649.
35. Newton, M., Cole, E.C., McCormack, M.L., Jr., and White, D.E. 1992. Response of spruce-fir forests to release by herbicides. II. Conifer response to residual hardwoods and overstocking. North. J. Appl. For. 9: 130-135.
36. Oregon Department of Forestry. 2003. Forestry Plan for Oregon 2003. Available from http://www.oregonforestry.oreg/fpfo/2003/default.htm.
37. Perlin, J. 1989. A forest journey: the role of wood in the development of civilization. W.W. Norton and Co., New York.
38. Richardson, B. 1993. Vegetation management practices in plantation forests of Australia and New Zealand. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 1989-2005.
39. Rose, R., and Ketchum, J.S. 2003. Interaction of initial seedling diameter, fertilization and weed control on Douglas-fir growth over the first four years after planting. Ann. For. Sci. 60: 625-635.
40. Rosner, L.S., and Rose, R. 2006. Synergistic stem volume response to combinations of vegetation control and seedling size in conifer plantations in Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 930-944.
41. Rowe, P.B., and Reimann, L.F. 1961. Water use by brush, grass, and grass-forb vegetation. J. For. 59: 175-181.
42. Scifres, C.J., and Koerth, B.H. 1986. Habitat alterations in mixed brush from variable rate herbicide patterns. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 14: 345-356.
43. Smith, D.M., Larson, B.C., Kelty, M.J., and Anton, P.M.S. 1997. The practice of silviculture: applied forest ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
44. South, D.B., Miller, J.H., Kimberley, M.O., and Vandershaaf, C.L. 2006. Determining productivity gains from forest vegetation management with "age-shift" calculations. Forestry (Oxf.), 79: 43-56.
45. Stewart, R.E., Gross, L.L., and Honkala, B.H. 1984. Effects of competing vegetation on forest trees: a bibliography with abstracts. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-43.
46. Sunderlin, W.D., and Rasosudarmo, J.A.P. 1996. Rates and causes of deforestation in Indonesia: toward a resolution of the ambiguities. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, Indonesia.
47. Tacconi, L. 2003. Fires in Indonesia: causes, costs and policy implications. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, Indonesia.
48. Toffler, A. 1980. The third wave. W.M. Morrow, New York.
49. Von Althen, F.W. 1981. Site preparation and post-planting weed control in hardwood afforestation: white ash, black walnut, basswood, silver maple and hybrid poplar. Can. For. Serv. Gt. Lakes For. Cent. Inf. Rep. 0-X-325.
50. Wadsworth, F.H. 1997. Forest production for tropical America. USDA Agric. Handb. 710.
51. Wagner, R.G., Newton, M., Cole, E.C., Miller, J.H., and Shiver, B.D. 2004. The role of herbicides for enhancing forest productivity and conserving land for biodiversity in North America. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 32: 1028-1041.
52. Walstad, J.D., and Kuch, P. 1987. Forest vegetation management for conifer production. John Wiley and Sons, New York.