Comparison of Proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 722-726

  Morledge Hampton, Scott J ^a   Kwon, Robert O ^a   Krishna, Rohit ^a,b   Debry, Peter W ^a   Willoughby, Thomas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intraocular pressure; Phosphene; Proview; Self tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION RETINOPATHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINA DETACHMENT; TONOMETER;

EID: 33846311736     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/I06-065     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, Gieser D, Vitale S, Lindenmuth K. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2000;9:134-42.
2. Hughes E, Spry P, Diamond J. 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure in glaucoma management: a retrospective review. J Glaucoma 2003;12:232-6.
3. Zeimer RC, Wilensky JT, Gieser DK, Viana MA. Association between intraocular pressure peaks and progression of visual field loss. Ophthalmology 1991;98:64-9.
4. Fresco BB. A new tonometer - the pressure phosphene tonometer: clinical comparison with Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 1998;105:2123-6.
5. Hart WM, ed. Adler's Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application. 9th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1992:442, 485, 498.
6. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician 1983;32:307-17.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
8. Kupin TH, Shin DH, Juzych MS, Olivier MM, Kim C. Use of a Tono-Pen for long-term home tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;116:643-4.
9. Lin HY, Hsu WM, Chou P, et al. Intraocular pressure measured with a noncontact tonometer in an elderly Chinese population: the Shihpai Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:381-6.
10. Losch A, Scheuerle A, Rupp V, Auffarth G, Becker M. Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the TGDc-01 tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243:313-6.
11. Zeimer RC, Wilensky JT, Gieser DK, Mori MM, Baker JP. Evaluation of a self tonometer for home use. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:1791-3.
12. Alvarez TL, Gollance SA, Thomas GA, et al. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1077-85.
13. Herse P, Hans A, Hall J, Langejans J, Markoulli M. The Proview Eye Pressure Monitor: influence of clinical factors on accuracy and agreement with the Goldmann tonometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:416-20.
14. Li J, Herndon LW, Asrani SG, Stinnett S, Allingham RR. Clinical comparison of the Proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1117-21.
15. Rai S, Moster MR, Kesen M, et al. Level of disagreement between Proview phosphene tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer intraocular pressure readings. J Glaucoma 2005;14:120-3.
16. Brigatti L, Maguluri S. Reproducibility of self-measured intraocular pressure with the phosphene tonometer in patients with ocular hypertension and early to advanced glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2005;14:36-9.