Biomechanical evaluation of the gliding nail in trochanteric fractures;Biomechanische evaluation des gleitnagels in der versorgung pertrochantärer frakturen

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 144, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 594-601

  Helwig, Peter ^a   Faust, G ^b   Hindenlang, U ^c   Suckel, A ^d   Kroplin B ^b   Sudkamp N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^c LASSO Ingenieurgesellschaft   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Finite element simulation; Gliding nail; Trochanteric fractures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE NAIL; DATA BASE; EVALUATION; FEMUR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL;

EID: 33846290686     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-942340     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gebhard F, Becker C, Hoellen I, Kinzl L. [Therapy of para-articular hip fractures in the elderly]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1999; 137 (6): 492-495
2. David A, der Heyde von D, Pommer A. [Therapeutic possibilities in trochanteric fractures. Safe - fast - stable]. Orthopade 2000; 29 (4): 294-301
3. Friedl W, Anthoni C, Fritz T, Schmotzer H, Wipf M. [Importance of blade geometry for stability of fixation with short intramedullary nailing systems for the proximal end of the femur (gliding nail)]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 1998; 115: 1224-1226
4. Suckel A, Helwig P, Schirmer A, Garbrecht M, Mocke U. [Complication rate in the treatment of inter- and subtrochanteric femur fractures with two intramedullary osteosyntheses. Comparison of a conventional nailing system and a rotation stable fixation of the head-neck-fragment, gammanail and glidingnail]. Zentralbl Chir 2003; 128 (3): 212-217
5. Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van der Heijden FH, den Hoed PT, Kerver AJ, van Vugt AB. Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004; 86(1): 86-94
6. Friedl W, Gohring U, Fritz T, Krieglstein C. [Gliding nail osteosynthesis. A new universally applicable implant for management of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures]. Chirurg 1998; 69 (2): 191-197
7. Lindequist S, Wredmark T, Eriksson SA, Samnegard E. Screw positions in femoral neck fractures. Comparison of two different screw positions in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64(1): 67-70
8. Steindl A, Schörghuber L. Treatment of per- and subtrochanteric fractures by Gliding Nail and PFN - early results and analysis of problems. Osteosynthese International 2000; 8 (8): 86-94
9. Werner-Tutschku W, Lajtai G, Schmiedhuber G, Lang T, Pirkl C, Orthner E. [Intra- and perioperative complications in the stabilization of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures by means of PFN]. Unfallchirurg 2002; 105 (10): 881-885
10. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001; 34(7): 859-871
11. Kummer B. Einführung in die Biomechanik des Hüftgelenkes. Springer, Heidelberg 1984
12. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 1993; 26 (8): 969-990
13. Duda GN, Heller M, Albinger J, Schulz O, Schneider E, Claes L. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J Biomech 1998; 31 (9): 841-846
14. Duda GN. Muskuloskelettale Belastungen: Beitrag zu den mechanischen Rahmenbedingungen der Frakturheilung. In: Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie. Medizinischen Fakultät Charité der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 2001; 136
15. Turner CH, Anne V, Pidaparti RMV. A uniform strain criterion for trabecular bone adaption: do continuum-level strain gradients drive adaption? Journal of Biomechanics 1997; 30: 555-563
16. Huber-Wagner S. Spannungsoptische Untersuchung verschiedener Stabilisierungsverfahren (Dynamische Hüftschraube, γ-Nagel, Proximaler Femur-Nagel) bei pertrochanteren Femurfrakturen. In: Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik. Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität, München 2002; 149
17. Duda GN, Schneider E, Chao EY. Internal forces and moments in the femur during walking. J Biomech 1997; 30(9): 933-941
18. Augat P, Burger J, Schorlemmer S, Henke T, Peraus M, Claes L. Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model. J Orthop Res 2003; 21 (6): 1011-1017
19. Cowin SC. The relationship between the elasticity tensor and the fabric tensor. Mech Mater 1985; 4: 137-147
20. Van Rietbergen B, Odgaard A, Kabel J, Huiskes R. Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture. J Biomech 1996; 29(12): 1653-1657
21. van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Huiskes R, Odgaard A. A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. J Biomech 1995; 28 (1): 69-81
22. Bourne BC, van der Meulen MC. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation. J Biomech 2004; 37: 613-621
23. Röhrle HSR, Sollbach W, Ritter G, Grünert A. Der Kraftfluss bei Endoprothesen. Arch Orthop Unfall-Chirurgie 1977; 89: 49-70
24. Schärer C. Muskuloskeletale Belastung und Beanspruchung des Femurs während des Gangzyklus: Entwicklung und Vergleich unterschiedlicher Belastungs- und Materialmodelle. In: Departement Biologie Fachstudiengang für Bewegungs- und Sportwissenschaften. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich 2005; 111
25. Abe H, Hayashi K, Sato M. Data handbook on mechanical Properties of Living Cells. In: Abe H, Hayashi K, Sato M (eds). Tissues and Organs. Springer, Tokyo 1996
26. Carter DR, Hayes WC Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science 1976; 194 (4270): 1174-1176
27. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1977; 59(7): 954-962
28. Wittel F, Dill-Langer G, Kröplin B. Modelling of Damage Evolution in Soft-Wood Perpendicular to grain by means of a Discrete Element Approach. Computational Materials Science 2005; 32 (3-4): 594-603
29. Fritz T, Hiersemann K, Krieglstein C, Friedl W. Prospective randomized comparison of gliding nail and gamma nail in the therapy of trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999; 119 (1-2): 1-6
30. Sperling R, Schnabel M, Sauerwein B, Garrel von T, Gotzen L, Stiletto R. [Evaluation and results of the gliding nail in the elderly patient]. Zentralbl Chir 2002; 127 (6): 507-513