Representing temporal musical objects and reasoning in the MusES system

Journal of New Music Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 252-275

  Pachet, François ^a   Ramalho, Geber ^a   Carrive, Jean ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b Université Paris VI ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846283996     PISSN: 09298215     EISSN: 17445027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09298219608570707     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen, J.F., 1983. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM, 16(11): 832–843.
2. Allen, J.F., 1984. Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence, 23: 123–154.
3. Ames, C., and Domino, M., 1992. “ Cybernetic composer: An overview ”. In Understanding Music with AI: Perspectives on Music Cognition, Edited by: Balaban, M., Ebicioglu, K., and Laske, O., California: The AAAI Press.
4. Carrive, J., 1995. Analyses de grilles de Jazz dans le système MusES, 6Laforia‐IBP, University of Paris. Master thesis.
5. Cointe, P., and Rodet, X., 1991. “ Formes: Composition and scheduling of process ”. In The Well‐Tempered Object: Musical Applications of Object‐Oriented Software Technology, Edited by: Pope, S.T., 64–82. MIT Press.
6. Coker, J., 1964. “ Improvising Jazz ”. In Computer Music Journal, New York: Simon and Schuster.
7. Fake. 1983. The World's Greatest Fake book, San Franscisco: Sher Music Co.
8. Fake. 1991. The New Real Book, Vol. 2, Petaluma: Sher Music Co.
9. Foote, B., and Johnson, R., Reflective facilities in Smalltalk‐80. Proceedings of OOPSLA'89. New Orleans, Louisiana. pp. 327–336.
10. Holland, S., 1994. “ Learning about harmony space: An overview ”. In Music Education: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective, Edited by: Smith, M., Smaill, A., and Wiggins, G., 24–40. London: Springer‐Verlag.
11. Johnson‐Laird, P., 1991. “ Jazz improvisation: a theory at the computational level ”. In Representing Musical Structure, Edited by: Howell, P., West, R., and Cross, I., 291–325. London: Academic Press.
12. Kowalski, R.A., and Sergot, M.J., 1986. A logic‐based calculus of events. New Generation Computing, 4: 67–95.
13. Levinson, R., and Wescott, C., Experienced‐Based Music Composition. Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium Workshop on Artificial Intelligence & Creativity. Melon Park. pp. 119–125. The AAAI Press.
14. Lieberman, H., Using prototypical objects to implement shared behavior in object‐oriented systems. Proceedings of OOPSLA ‘86. Portland, Oregon. pp. 214–223.
15. Maxwell, H.J., 1992. “ An expert system for harmonizing analysis of tonal music ”. In Understanding Music with AI: Perspectives on Music Cognition, Edited by: Ebcioglu, K., Laske, O., and Balaban, M., 335–353. AAAI Press.
16. McDermott, D., 1982. A temporal logic for reasoning about processes and plans. Cognitive science, 6: 101–155.
17. Minsky, M., 1975. “ A framework for representing knowledge ”. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, Edited by: Winston, P., 211–277. New York: McGraw Hill.
18. Mouton, R., and Pachet, F., Numeric versus symbolic controversy in automatic analysis of tonal music. IJCAI'95 Workshop on Music and Artificial Intelligence. Montrèal, (Ca). pp. 32–40.
19. Pachet, F., A meta‐level architecture for analyzing jazz chord sequences. International Conference on Computer Music. Montréal, Canada. pp. 266–269.
20. Pachet, F., 1991b. “ Representing knowledge used by jazz musicians ”. In International Conference on Computer Music 285–288. Montréal, Canada
21. Pachet, F., The MusES system: an environment for experimenting with knowledge representation techniques in tonal harmony. Proceedings First Brazilian symposium on computer music ‐ SBC&M ‘94. Caxambu, Minas Gerais, Brazil. pp. 195–201.
22. Pachet, F., 1994b. “ An object‐oriented representation of pitch‐classes, intervals, scales and chords ”. In Journées d'Informatique Musicale 19–34. Bordeaux
23. Pachet, F., and Roy, P., Mixing constraints and objects: a case study in automatic harmonization. Proceedings of TOOLS Europe ‘95. Versailles. pp. 119–126. Prentice‐Hall.
24. Pachet, F., Carrive, J., and Dojat, M., 1996. Representation of circular time. Computers in Biology and Medicine, Submitted to
25. Pope, S., 1991. “ Introduction to MODE: The Musical Object Development Environment ”. In The Well‐Tempered Object: Musical Applications of Object‐Oriented Software Technology, Edited by: Pope, S.T., 83–106. MIT Press.
26. Ramalho, G., and Pachet, F., From real book to real jazz performance. International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Lièges, Belgium. pp. 349–350.
27. Ramalho, G., and Ganascia, J.‐G., Simulating creativity in jazz performance. Proceedings of 12th AAAI conference. Seattle. pp. 108–113.
28. Ramalho, G., and Ganascia, J.‐G., 1994b. “ The role of musical memory in creativity and learning: a study of jazz performance ”. In Music Education: an Artificial Intelligence Perspective, Edited by: Smith, M., Smaill, A., and Wiggins, G., 143–156. London: Springer‐Verlag.
29. Real. 1981. The Real Book, The Real Book Press.
30. Roads, C., 1988. “ Grammars as representations for music ”. In Foundations of Computer Music, Edited by: Roads, C., and Strawn, J., 403–442. MIT Press.
31. Rolland, P.Y., and Ganascia, J.G., Automated motive oriented analysis of musical corpuses: A jazz case study. 20th International Computer Music Conference (ICMC'96). Honk Kong.
32. Scaletti, C., Kyma: An object‐oriented language for music composition. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco. International Computer Music Association.
33. Slade, S., 1991. Case‐Based Reasoning: A Research Paradigm. AI Magazine, Spring: 42–55.
34. Smoliar, S.W., 1980. A Computer Aid for Schenkerian Analysis. Computer Music Journal, 4: 41–59.
35. Steedman, M.J., 1984. A generative grammar for jazz chord sequences. Music Perception, 2: 52–77.
36. Steels, L., 1979. Reasoning Modeled as a Society of Communicating Experts, MIT AI Lab. n. AI‐TR‐542
37. Sundberg, J., and Lindblom, B., 1993. “ Generative Theories in Language and Music Descriptions ”. In Machine Models of Music, Edited by: Schwanauer, S., and Levitt, D., 263–286. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
38. Tsang, E.P., Times structures for Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings 10th IJCAI. pp. 456–461.
39. Ulrich, W., The analysis and synthesis of jazz by computer. Proceedings Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA. pp. 865–872. MIT.
40. Walker, W., Hebel, K., Martirano, S., and Scaletti, C., ImprovisationBuilder: improvisation as conversation. Proceedings of ICMC. 1992.
41. Winograd, T., 1968. Linguistic and computer analysis of tonal harmony. Journal of Music Theory, 12: 2–49.
42. Schwanauer, S.M., and Levitt, D.A., eds. 1993. Machines Models of Music, 113–153. MIT Press.