Methods for the selection of tagging SNPs: A comparison of tagging efficiency and performance

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 228-236

  Ding, Keyue ^a   Kullo, Iftikhar J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE TAGGED SITES;

EID: 33846283432     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201755     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Risch N, Merikangas K: The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 1996; 273: 1516-1517.
2. Peltonen L, McKusick VA: Genomics and medicine. Dissecting human disease in the postgenomic era. Science 2001; 291: 1224-1229.
3. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H et al: The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 2002; 296: 2225-2229.
4. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R: Reciprocal crossover asymmetry and meiotic drive in a human recombination hot spot. Nat Genet 2002; 31: 267-271.
5. Johnson GC, Esposito L, Barratt BJ et al: Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes. Nat Genet 2001; 29: 233-237.
6. Halldorsson BV, Bafna V, Lippert R et al: Optimal haplotype block-free selection of tagging SNPs for genome-wide association studies. Genome Res 2004; 14: 1633-1640.
7. Patil N, Berno AJ, Hinds DA et al: Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science 2001; 294: 1719-1723.
8. Zhang K, Deng M, Chen T, Waterman MS, Sun F: A dynamic programming algorithm for haplotype block partitioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 7335-7339.
9. Zhang K, Qin ZS, Liu JS, Chen T, Waterman MS, Sun F: Haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection using genotype data and their applications to association studies. Genome Res 2004; 14: 908-916.
10. Stram DO, Haiman CA, Hirschhorn JN et al: Choosing haplotype-tagging SNPS based on unphased genotype data using a preliminary sample of unrelated subjects with an example from the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Hum Hered 2003; 55: 27-36.
11. Weale ME, Depondt C, Macdonald SJ et al: Selection and evaluation of tagging SNPs in the neuronal-sodium-channel gene SCN1A: Implications for linkage-disequilibrium gene mapping. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 73: 551-565.
12. Meng Z, Zaykin DV, Xu CF, Wagner M, Ehm MG: Selection of genetic markers for association analyses, using linkage disequilibrium and haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 73: 115-130.
13. Lin Z, Altman RB: Finding haplotype tagging SNPs by use of principal components analysis. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75: 850-861.
14. Wu X, Luke A, Rieder M et al: An association study of angiotensinogen polymorphisms with serum level and hypertension in an African-American population. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1847-1852.
15. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Yi Q, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA: Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74: 106-120.
16. Bafna V, Halldorsson BV, Schwartz R, Clark AG, Istrail S: Haplotypes and informative SNP selection algorithms: Don't block out information. Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology 2003. New York, USA: ACM Press, pp 19-27.
17. Sebastiani P, Lazarus R, Weiss ST, Kunkel LM, Kohane IS, Ramoni MF: Minimal haplotype tagging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 9900-9905.
18. Wall JD, Pritchard JK: Assessing the performance of the haplotype block model of linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 73: 502-515.
19. Halldorsson BV, Istrail S, De La Vega FM: Optimal selection of SNP markers for disease association studies. Hum Hered 2004; 58: 190-202.
20. Crawford DC, Carlson CS, Rieder MJ et al: Haplotype diversity across 100 candidate genes for inflammation, lipid metabolism, and blood pressure regulation in two populations. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74: 610-622.
21. Abecasis GR, Noguchi E, Heinzmann A et al: Extent and distribution of linkage disequilibrium in three genomic regions. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 191-197.
22. Ding K, Zhou K, He F, Shen Y: LDA - a java-based linkage disequilibrium analyzer. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 2147-2148.
23. Nothnagel M, Furst R, Rohde K: Entropy as a measure for linkage disequilibrium over multilocus haplotype blocks. Hum Hered 2002; 54: 186-198.
24. Wang N, Akey JM, Zhang K, Chakraborty R, Jin L: Distribution of recombination crossovers and the origin of haplotype blocks: The interplay of population history, recombination, and mutation. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71: 1227-1234.
25. Ding K, Zhou K, Zhang J, Knight J, Zhang X, Shen Y: The effect of haplotype block definitions on inference of haplotype block structure and htSNPs selection. Mol Biol Evol 2005; 22: 148-159.
26. Schulze TG, Zhang K, Chen Y-S, Akula N, Sun F, McMahon FJ: Defining haplotype blocks and tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13: 335-342.
27. Schwartz R, Halldorsson BV, Bafna V, Clark AG, Istrail S: Robustness of inference of haplotype block structure. J Comput Biol 2003; 10: 13-19.
28. ZhanH K, Qin Z, Chen T, Liu JS, Waterman MS, Sun F: HapBlock: haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection software using a set of dynamic programming algorithms. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 131-134.
29. Goldstein DB, Ahmadi KR, Weale ME, Wood NW: Genome scans and candidate gene approaches in the study of common diseases and variable drug responses. Trends Genet 2003; 19: 615-622.
30. Ke X, Durrant C, Morris A et al: Efficiency and consistency of haplotype tagging of dense SNP maps in multiple samples. Hum Mol Genet 2004.
31. Halperin E, Kimmel G, Shamir R: Tag SNP selection in genotype data for maximizing SNP prediction accuracy. Bioinformatics 2005; 21 (Suppl 1): i195-i203.
32. KiGmel G, Shamir R: GERBIL: genotype resolution and block identification using likelihood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 158-162.
33. Liu N, Sawyer SL, Mukherjee N et al: Haplotype block structures show significant variation among populations. Genet Epidemiol 2004; 27: 385-400.
34. Ke X, Miretti MM, Broxholme J et al: A comparison of tagging methods and their tagging space. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14: 2757-2767.
35. Forton J, Kwiatkowski D, Rockett K, Luoni G, Kimber M, Hull J: Accuracy of haplotype reconstruction from haplotype-tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 76: 438-448.
36. The International HapMap Consortium: The International HapMap Project. Nature 2003; 426: 789-796.
37. Mueller JC, Lohmussaar E, Magi R et al: Linkage disequilibrium patterns and tagSNP transferability among European populations. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 76: 387-398.
38. Huang W, He Y, Wang H et al: Linkage disequilibrium sharing and haplotype-tagged SNP portability between populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 1418-1421.
39. Livingston RJ, von Niederhausern A, Jegga AG et al: Pattern of sequence variation across 213 environmental response genes. Genome Res 2004; 14: 1821-1831.
40. Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA: Variation is the spice of life. Nat Genet 2001; 27: 234-236.
41. Thompson D, Stram D, Goldgar D, Witte JS: Haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms and association studies. Hum Hered 2003; 56: 48-55.
42. Zhang K, Calabrese P, Nordborg M, Sun F: Haplotype block structure and its applications to association studies: Power and study designs. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71: 1386-1394.
43. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P: A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 978-989.
44. Zhang S, Pakstis AJ, Kidd KK, Zhao H: Comparisons of two methods for haplotype reconstruction and haplotype frequency estimation from population data. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 69: 906-914