Efficient optimization processes using kriging approximation models in electrical impedance tomography

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 202-220

  Mera, N S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cavity detection; Evolution strategy; Kriging

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION;

CAVITY DETECTION; EVOLUTION STRATEGY; KRIGING APPROXIMATION; SUBSURFACE CAVITIES;

CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS;

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 33846283400     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1772     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hsieh CK, Su KC. A methodology of predicting cavity geometry based on the scanned surface temperature data - prescribed heat flux at the cavity side. Journal of Heat Transfer 1981; 103:42-47.
2. Hsieh CK, Kassab AJ. A general method for the solution of inverse heat conduction problems with partially unknown system geometries. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 1986; 29:47-58.
3. Kassab AJ, Hsieh CK, Pollard J. Solution of the inverse geometric problem for the detection of subsurface cavities by the IR-CAT method. In Boundary Integral Formulations for Inverse Analysis, Ingham DB, Wrobel LC (eds). Computational Mechanics Publications: Southampton, 1997; 33-65.
4. Rus G, Gallego R. Optimization algorithms for identification inverse problems with the boundary element method. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 2002 26:315-327.
5. Back T. Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1996.
6. Mera NS, Elliott L, Ingham DB. Detection of subsurface cavities in IR-CAT by a real coded genetic algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 2002; 2(2):129-139.
7. Jin Y. A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary optimization. Soft Computing 2005; 9(1):3-12.
8. Friedman A, Isakov V. On the uniqueness of the inverse conductivity problem with one measurement. Indiana University Mathematics Journal 1989; 38:553-580.
9. Isakov V, Powell J. On the inverse conductivity problem with one measurement. Inverse Problems 1990; 6:311-388.
10. Barcello B, Fabes E, Seo JK. The inverse conductivity problem with one measurement: uniqueness for convex polyhedra. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1994; 122:183-189.
11. Kang H, Seo JK. The layer potential technique for the inverse conductivity problem. Inverse Problems 1996; 12:267-278.
12. Seo JK. On the uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications 1996; 2:227-235.
13. Schwefel HP. Numerical Optimisation of Computer Models. Wiley: Chichester, 1981.
14. Jin Y, Olhofer M, Sendhoff B. A framework for evolutionary optimization with approximate fitness functions. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 2002; 6(5):481-494.
15. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flanery BP. Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1997.
16. Michalewicz Z. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer: Berlin, 1996.
17. Buche D, Schraudolph N, Koumoutsakos P. Accelerating evolutionary algorithms with Gaussian process fitness function models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C 2004; 34, in press.
18. Jin Y, Sendhoff B. Reducing fitness evaluations using clustering techniques and neural network ensembles. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO 2004, LNCS 3102, Deb K et al. (eds). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004; 688-699.
19. Vauhkonen M, Kaipio JP, Somersalo E, Karjalainen PA. Electrical impedance tomography with basis constraints. Inverse Problems 1997; 13:523-530.