Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: A comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 299-304

  Kakeji, Y ^a   Konishi, K ^a   Ieiri, S ^a   Yasunaga, T ^a   Nakamoto, M ^a   Tanoue, K ^a   Baba, H ^b   Maehara, Y ^a   Hashizume, M ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Da Vinci; Gastrectomy; Robotics; Telemanipulator; Zeus

Indexed keywords

BODY FLUIDS; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TISSUE; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

DA VINCI; DA VINCI SYSTEM; GASTRECTOMY; GENERAL SURGERY; LYMPH NODE; MASTER SLAVE PRINCIPLES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEMS; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; TELEMANIPULATOR; ZEUS;

DISSECTION;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISOLATION PROCEDURE; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MALE; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; ROBOTICS; SKIN INCISION; STOMACH CANCER; VEIN LIGATION;

EID: 33846280799     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.104     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kitano S, Shiraishi N. Current status of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in Japan. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 182-185.
2. Goh PM, Alponat A, Mak K, Kum CK. Early international results of laparoscopic gastrectomies. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 650-652.
3. Adachi Y, Suematsu T, Shiraishi N, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 49-54.
4. Rosser JC, Rosser LC, Savalgi RS. Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 200-204.
5. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, et al. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 957-961.
6. Kappert U, Schneider J, Cichon R, et al. Wrist-enhanced instrumentation: moving toward totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1105-1108.
7. Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, et al. Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system Zeus for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 11-16.
8. Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, et al. Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endoscopy 2002; 16: 1187-1191.
9. Kappert U, Schneider J, Cichon R, et al. Wrist-enhanced instrumentation: moving toward totally endoscopic coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1105-1108.
10. Margossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 530-534.
11. Dakin GF, Gagner M. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 574-579.
12. Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 2001; 58: 893-898.
13. Lambert R. Endoscopic therapy of esophago-gastric tumors. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 24-33.
14. Ohgami M, Kumai K, Otani Y, et al. Laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach for early gastric cancer using a lesion-lifting method. Dig Surg 1994; 11: 64-67.
15. Ohashi S. Laparoscopic intraluminal (intragastric) surgery for early gastric cancer. A new concept in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 169-171.
16. Shurr MO, Breitwieser H, Meltzer A, et al. Experimental telemanipulation in endoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996; 6: 167-175.
17. Hashizume M. Telerobotic-assisted gastric surgery. Primer of Robotic and Telerobotic Surgery, Ballantyne GH (ed.). Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, 2004; 147-154.