Comparison of growth and yield components of conventional and ultra-narrow row cotton

Journal of Cotton Science

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 235-243

  Vories, Earl D ^a   Glover, Robert E ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

COTTON; CROP PRODUCTION; HERBICIDE; YIELD;

EID: 33846271489     PISSN: 15243303     EISSN: 15243303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allen, C.T., C. Kennedy, B. Robertson, M. Kharboutli, K. Bryant, C. Capps, and L. Earnest. 1998. Potential of ultra-narrow row cotton in Southeast Arkansas. p. 1403-1406. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Diego, CA. 5-9 Jan. 1998. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
2. Atwell, S.D. 1996. Influence of ultra narrow row on cotton growth and development. p. 1187-1188. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 9-12 Jan. 1996. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
3. Bednarz, C.W., and R.L. Nichols. 2005. Phenological and morphological components of cotton crop maturity. Crop Sci. 45:1497-1503.
4. Bednarz, C.W., S.M. Brown, and M.J. Bader. 1999. Ultra narrow row cotton research in Georgia. p. 580. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Orlando, FL. 3-7 Jan. 1999. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
5. Bonner, C.M. 1995. 1995 cotton production recommendations. Publ. AG422-4-95. Univ. Arkansas Coop. Ext. Serv., Little Rock, AR.
6. Boquet, D.J. 2005. Cotton in ultra-narrow row spacing: plant density and nitrogen fertilizer rates. Agron. J. 97(1):279-287.
7. Bourland, F.M., and C.E. Watson. 1990. COTMAP, a technique for evaluating structure and yield of cotton. Crop Sci. 30(1):224-226.
8. Burmester, C.H. 1996. Status of ultra-narrow row research in the Southeast. p. 67-68. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 9-12 Jan. 1996. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
9. Gerik, T.J., R.G. Lemon, and E.M. Steglich. 1999. Ultra-narrow row cotton performance under drought conditions. p. 581. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Orlando, FL. 3-7 Jan. 1999. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
10. Guinn, G., J.R. Mauney, and K.E. Fry. 1981. Irrigation scheduling and plant population effects on growth, bloom rates, boll abscission, and yield of cotton. Agron. J. 73:529-534.
11. Gwathmey, C.O., C.E. Michaud, R.D. Cossar, and S.H. Crowe. 1999. Development and cutout curves for ultranarrow and wide-row cotton in Tennessee. p. 630-632. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Orlando, FL. 3-7 Jan. 1999. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
12. Heitholt, J.J. 1995. Cotton flowering and boll retention in different planting configurations and leaf shapes. Agron. J. 85:590-594.
13. Jost, P.H., and J.T. Cothren. 2001. Phenotypic alterations and crop maturity differences in ultra-narrow row and conventionally spaced cotton. Crop Sci. 41:1150-1159.
14. Jost, P.H., and J.T. Cothren. 2000. Growth and yield comparisons of cotton planted in conventional and ultra-narrow row spacings. Crop Sci. 40:430-435.
15. Krieg, D.R. 1996. Physiological aspects of ultra-narrow row cotton production. p. 66. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 9-12 Jan. 1996. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
16. Nichols, S.P., C.E. Snipes, and M.A. Jones. 2004. Cotton growth, lint yield, and fiber quality as affected by row spacing and cultivar. J. Cotton Sci. 8(1):1-12 [Online]. Available at http://www.cotton.org/ journal/2004-08/1/1.cfm
17. Parish, R. L., S. M. Brister, and D. E. Mermoud. 1973. Widebed, narrow-row cotton: preliminary research results. Ark. Farm Res. 22(2):4.
18. Perkins, W.R. 1998. Three-year overview of UNRC vs. conventional cotton. p. 91. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 9-12 Jan. 1996. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
19. Perkins, W.R., and S.D. Atwell. 1996. Ultra-narrow row harvesting approaches. p. 69-70. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 9-12 Jan. 1996. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
20. Vories, E.D., T.D. Valco, K.J. Bryant, and R.E. Glover. 2001. Three-year comparison of conventional and ultra narrow row cotton production systems. Appl. Engr. Agric. 17(5):583-589.
21. Waddle, B. A., and J. Pennington. 1974. Results of twin-drill planting comparisons in cotton, 1973. Ser. No. 222. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Mimeo, Fayetteville, AR.
22. Wanjura, D.F., and A.D. Brashears. 1983. Factors influencing cotton stripper performance. Trans. ASAE 26(1): 54-58.