Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: A new era in the detection of reversible myocardial ischaemia

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 7-10

  Watkins, S ^a   Oldroyd, K G ^a   Frohwein, S ^b  

^a WESTERN INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b Atlanta Cardiovasc Res Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; DOBUTAMINE; GADOLINIUM;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CANNULA; CHEST TIGHTNESS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIZZINESS; DYSPNEA; EDITORIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUSHING; HALF LIFE TIME; HEADACHE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIDE EFFECT; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STENOSIS; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VISUAL ACUITY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA;

EID: 33846261864     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.084608     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Ashley EA, Myers J, Froelicher V. Exercise testing in clinical medicine. Lancet 2000;356:1592-7.
2. Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:261-91.
3. Moir S, Haluska BA, Jenkins C, et al. Incremental benefit of myocardial contrast to combined dipyridamole-exercise stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2004;110:1108-13.
4. Donnelly PM, Higginson JD, Hanley PD. Multidetector CT coronary angiography: have we found me holy grail of non-invasive coronary imaging? Heart 2005;91:1385-8.
5. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 2001;103:2928-34.
6. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Eng J Med 1984;310:819-24.
7. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-42.
8. Hoffmann MH, Schmid FT, Jeltsch M, et al. Multislice MR first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: impact of the receiver coil array. J Magn Res Imag 2005;21:310-16.
9. Kellman P, Derbyshire JA, Agyeman KO, et al. Extended coverage first-pass perfusion imaging using slice-interleaved TSENSE. Mag Res Med 2004;51:200-4.
10. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1657-05.
11. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 2004;110:835-42.
12. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-5.
13. Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Schreiber K, et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Card 2002;39:864-70.
14. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108:432-7.
15. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, et al. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 2003;229:209-16.
16. Plein S, Greenwood JP, Ridgway JP, et al. Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2173-81.
17. Takase B, Nagata M, Kihara T, et al. Whole-heart dipyridamole stress first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI for the detection of coronary artery disease. Jpn Heart J 2004;45:475-86.
18. Plein S, Radjenovic A, Ridgwav JP, et al. Coronary artery disease: myocardial perfusion MR imaging with sensitivity encoding versus conventional angiography. Radiology 2005;235:423-30.
19. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 2004;110:732-7.
20. Jerosch-Herold M, Seethamraju RT, Swingen CM, et al. Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI. J Mag Res Imag 2004;19:758- 70.
21. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 1997;204:373-84.
22. Di Bella EV, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Mag Res Med 2005;54:1295-9.
23. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH, et al. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232:677-84.
24. Gatehouse PD, Elkington AG, Ablitt NA, et al. Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high-dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Mag Res Imag 2004;20:39-45.