Are small innovators credit rationed?

Small Business Economics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 23-35

  Freel, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846260823     PISSN: 0921898X     EISSN: 15730913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-005-6058-6     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, A., 1982, Barriers to Product innovation in Small Firms: Policy Implications, European Small Business Journal 1, 67-86.
2. Arrow, K., 1971, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in K. Arrow (eds.), Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Chicago: Markham.
3. Baldwin J., G. Gellatly and V. Gaudreault, 2002, Financing innovation in new small firms: New evidence from Canada, 11F0019, No. 190, Micro-Economic Analysis Division, Statistics Canada.
4. Bank of England, 1996, The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms, London, October.
5. Bank of England, 2001, The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms, London, February.
6. Bank of England, 2004. Finance for Small Firms - An Eleventh Report, London, April.
7. Beck T., A. Demirgüç-Kunt and V. Maksimovic, 2003, Bank Competition, Financing Obstacles, and Access to Credit, World Bank Policy Research WP 2996.
8. Binks M., 1979, Finance for expansion in the small firm, Lloyds Bank Review, October.
9. Binks, M. R. and C. T. Ennew, 1996, Growing Firms and the Credit Constraints, Small Business Economics 8, 17-25.
10. Boocock, G. and M. Woods, 1997, The evaluation criteria used by venture capitalists: evidence from a UK venture fund, International Small Business Journal 16, 36-57.
11. Brophy, D. and J. Shulman, 1993, Financial Factors which Stimulate Innovation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17, 61-75.
12. Bullock A. and A. Hughes, 2000, The Survey Method, the SME Panel Database and Sample Attrition, in CBR British Enterprise in Transition, ESCR Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
13. Canepa A. and P. Stoneman, 2002, Financial constraints on innovation: A European cross country study, United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, Maastricht, NL.
14. CBI, 1996. Tech Stars: Breaking the growth barriers for technology-based SMEs, London.
15. Centre for Business Research (CBR), 1996, The Changing State of British Enterprise, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
16. Centre for Business Research (CBR), 1998, Enterprise Britain, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
17. Centre for Business Research, 2000, British Enterprise in Transition, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
18. Centre for Business Research (CBR), 2003, Enterprise Challenged, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
19. Cohen, W., 1995, Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity, in P. Stoneman (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Blackwell, 182-264.
20. Cosh A., A. Hughes and E. Wood, 1998, Innovation surveys and very small enterprises, WP89, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
21. Cressy, R., 1996, Are Business Startups Debt Rationed, The Economic Journal 106, 1253-1270.
22. Cressy, R. and C. Olofsson, 1997, European SME Financing: An Overview, 9, 87-86.
23. Ennew, C. and M. Binks, 1995, The Provision of Finance to Small Firms: Does the Banking Relationship Constrain Performance?, Journal of Small Business Finance 4, 69-85.
24. Freel, M., 1999, The Financing of Small Firm Product Innovation in the UK, Technovation 19, 707-719.
25. Freel, M., 2003, Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking, and Proximity, Research Policy 32, 751-770.
26. Giudici, G. and S. Paleari, 2000, The Provision of Finance to Innovation: A Survey Conducted Among Italian Technology-based Small Firms, Small Business Economics 14, 37-53.
27. Guiso, L., 1998, High-tech Firms and Credit Rationing, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 35, 39-59.
28. HM Treasury, 1998, Financing of High Technology Businesses: A report to the Paymaster General, London, November.
29. Hoffman, K., P. Milady, J. Bessant and L. Perren, 1998, Small firms, R&D, Technology and Innovation in the UK: A Literature Review, Technovation 18, 39-55.
30. Jensen, J. B. and R. H. McGuckin, 1997, Firm Performance and Evolution: Empirical Regularities in the US Microdata, Industrial and Corporate Change 6, 25-47.
31. Keeton, W., 1979, Equilibrium Credit Rationing, New York: Garland Publishing.
32. Levenson, A. R. and K. L. Willard, 2000, Do Firms Get the Financing They Want? Measuring Credit Rationing Experienced by Small Businesses in the U.S., Small Business Economics 14, 83-94.
33. Love, B. and S. Roper, 1999, The Determinants of Innovation: R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects, Review of Industrial Organisation 15, 43-64.
34. Martin, S. and J. Scott, 2000, The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation, Research Policy 29, 437-448.
35. Moore, I. and E. Garnsey, 1993, Funding for Innovation in Small Firms: The Role of Government, Research Policy 22, 507-519.
36. Murray, G. and J. Lott, 1993, Have UK Venture Capitalists a Bias against Investment in New Technology-based Firms?, Research Policy 24, 283-299.
37. Myers, S. and N. Majluf, 1984, Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information that Investors do not, Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221.
38. Oakey R., 1997, A Review of Policy and Practice Relating to High Technology Small Finns in the United Kingdom, WP 359, MBS, University of Manchester.
39. Oakey R., R. Rothwell and S. Cooper, 1988, Management of Innovation in High Technology Small Firms, Pinter, London.
40. Parker, S., 2002, Do Banks Ration Credit to New Enterprises? And should Governments Intervene?, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49, 162-195.
41. SBRC, 1992. The State of British Enterprise, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
42. Seaton, J. and I. Walker, 1997, The Pattern of R&D Finance for Small UK Companies, in R. Oakey and S.-M. Mukhtar (eds.), New technology-based firms in the 1990s, London: Paul Chapman, 71-91.
43. Stiglitz J., 1993. Endogenous growth and cycles, NBER WP 4286.
44. Stinchcombe, A. L., 1965, Social Structure and Organizations, in J. G. March (eds.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally & Company, 142-193.
45. Storey D., 1994. Understanding the Small Business Sector, London, Routledge.
46. Symeonidis G., 1996. Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses and Some New Themes, Economics Dept. WP 161, OECD, Paris.
47. Tabachnik B. and L. Fidell, 2001. Using multivariate statistics, 4th ed., Pearson, Needham Heights, MA.
48. Tylecote, A., 1994, Financial Systems and Innovation, in M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 259-267.
49. Westhead, P. and D. Storey, 1997, Financial Constraints on the Growth of High-Technology Small Firms in the United Kingdom, Applied Financial Economics 1, 197-201.