Aquatic zooremediation: deploying animals to remediate contaminated aquatic environments

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 60-65

  Gifford, Scott ^a   Dunstan, R Hugh ^a   O'Connor, Wayne ^b   Koller, Claudia E ^a   MacFarlane, Geoff R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b NSW DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS; HEALTH CARE; HYDROCARBONS; MARINE BIOLOGY; NUTRITION; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS; WATER POLLUTION;

MICROBIAL CONTAMINANTS; PHYTOREMEDIATION; ZOOEXTRACTION; ZOOREMEDIATION; ZOOTRANSFORMATION;

BIOREMEDIATION;

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; BIOACCUMULATION; CHLORINATION; ECOSYSTEM; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; OYSTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; FRESH WATER; METALS, HEAVY; MOLLUSCA; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; PORIFERA; SEAWATER; TERMINOLOGY; WATER POLLUTANTS; WATER POLLUTION;

ANIMALIA; PINCTADA;

EID: 33846260811     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.12.002     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Olguin E.J. Phycoremediation: key issues for cost-effective nutrient removal processes. Biotechnol. Adv. 22 (2003) 81-91
2. Sursala S., et al. Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic chemical contamination. Ecol. Eng. 18 (2002) 647-658
3. Reeves R.D., and Baker A.J.M. Metal-accumulating plants. In: Raskin I., and Ensley B.D. (Eds). Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals: Using Plants to Clean Up the Environment (2000), John Wiley and Sons 193-229
4. Gifford S., et al. Quantification of in situ nutrient and heavy metal remediation by a small pearl oyster (Pinctada imbricata) farm at Port Stephens. Australia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50 (2005) 417-422
5. Haamer J. Improving water quality in a eutrophied fjord system with mussel farming. Ambio 25 (1996) 356-362
6. Mackenzie B.R., et al. Fish, fishing, and pollutant reduction in the Baltic Sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 1970-1976
7. Milanese M., et al. The marine sponge Chondrilla nucula Schmidt, 1862 as an elective candidate for bioremediation in integrated aquaculture. Biomol. Eng. 20 (2003) 363-368
8. Newell R.I.E. Ecological changes in Chesepeake Bay: are they the result of overharvesting the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica?. In: Lynch M.P., and Krome E.C. (Eds). Understanding the Estuary: Advances in Chesapeake Bay Research (1988), Chesapeake Research Consortium 536-546
9. Stabili L., et al. Sabella spallanzii filter-feeding on bacterial community: Ecological implications and applications. Mar. Environ. Res. 61 (2006) 74-92
10. Giangrande A., et al. Utilization of the filter-feeder polychaete Sabella spallanzii Gmelin (Sabellidae) as bioremediator in aquaculture. Aquac. Int. 13 (2005) 129-136
11. Gudimov A.V. Zooremediation, a new biotechnology solution for shoreline protection and cleanup. Proceedings of the 25th Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (2002) 401-412
12. Neori A., et al. Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231 (2004) 361-391
13. Stirling H.P., and Okumus I. Growth and production of mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) suspended at salmon marine cages and mussel farms in two sea lochs on the west coast of Scotland. Aquaculture 134 (1995) 193-210
14. Jones A.B., et al. Integrated treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation, oyster filtration and macroalgal absorption: a laboratory scale study. Aquaculture 193 (2001) 155-178
15. Shpigel M., et al. A biomechanical filter for treating fish pond effluents. Aquaculture 152 (1997) 103-117
16. Rice M.A. Environmental impacts of shellfish aquaculture: filter feeding to control eutrophication. In: Tlusty M., Bengtson D., Halvorson H.O., Oktay S., Pearce J., and Rheault Jr. R.B. (Eds). Marine Aquaculture and theEnvironment: A Meeting of Stakeholders in the Northeast (2001), Cape Cod Press 77-86
17. Fu W.T., et al. Potential of the marine sponge Hymeniacidon perleve as a bioremediator of pathogenic bacteria in integrated aquaculture systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 93 (2006) 1112-1122
18. Reiswig H.M. Water transport, respiration and energetics of three tropical marine sponges. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 14 (1974) 231-249
19. Stabili L., et al. Filtering activity of Spongia officinalis var adriatica (Schmidt) (Porifera, demospongiae) on bacterioplankton: Implications for bioremediation of polluted seawater. Water Res. 40 (2006) 3083-3090
20. Hadas E., et al. Sea ranching of the marine sponge Negombata magnifica (Demospongiae, Latrunculiidae) as a first step for latrunculin B mass production. Aquaculture 244 (2005) 159-169
21. Licciano M., et al. Clearance rates of Sabella spallanzii and Branchiomma luctuosum (Annelida: Polychaeta) on a pure culture of Vibrio alginolyticus. Water Res. 39 (2005) 4375-4384
22. Coen L.D., and Luckenbach M.W. Developing success criteria goals for evaluating oyster reef restoration: ecological function or resource exploitation. Ecol. Eng. 15 (2000) 323-343
23. Kirby M.X., and Miller H.M. Response of a benthic suspension feeder (Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) to three centuries of anthropogenic eutrophication in Chesapeake Bay. Estuar. Coast Shelf S. 62 (2005) 679-689
24. Esher D. Recommendations on Suminoe oyster (Crassostrea ariakensis) aquaculture in Chesapeake Bay (2002), Chesapeake Bay Program Federal Agencies Committee
25. Leach J.H. Impacts of the zebra mussel (Dressena polymorpha) on water quality and fish spawning reefs in western Lake Erie. In: Nalepa T.F., and Schloesser D.W. (Eds). Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control (1993), Lewis Publishers 381-397
26. Phelps H.L. The Asiatic clam (Corbicula fluminea) invasion and system-level ecological change in the Potomac river estuary near Washington, D. C. Estuaries 17 (1994) 614-621
27. Gottlieb S.J., and Schweighofer M.E. Oysters and the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem: a case for exotic species introduction?. Estuaries 19 (1996) 639-650
28. Ostroumov S. Some aspects of water filtering activity of filter feeders. Hydrobiologia 542 (2005) 275-286
29. Gifford S., et al. Pearl aquaculture: profitable environmental remediation?. Sci. Total Environ. 319 (2004) 27-37
30. O'Connor T.P. National distribution of chemical concentrations in mussels and oysters in the USA. Mar. Environ. Res. 53 (2002) 117-143
31. Das S., and Jana B. In situ cadmium reclamation by freshwater bivalve Lamellidens marginalis from an industrial pollutant-fed river canal. Chemosphere 52 (2003) 161-173
32. Jana B., and Das S. Potential of freshwater mussel (Lamellidens marginalis) for cadmium clearance in a model system. Ecol. Eng. 8 (1997) 179-193
33. Bargagli R., et al. Elevated cadmium accumulation in marine organisms from Terra Nova Bay (Antarctica). Polar Biol. 16 (1996) 513-520
34. Cebrian E., et al. Sublethal effects of contamination on the Mediterranean sponge Crambe crambe: metal accumulation and biological responses. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46 (2003) 1273-1284
35. Hansen I.V., et al. Accumulation of copper, zinc, cadmium and chromium by the marine sponge Halichondria panicea Pallas and the implications for biomonitoring. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 31 (1995) 133-138
36. Perez T., et al. Effects of 12 years' operation of a sewage treatment plant on trace metal occurrence within a Mediterranean commercial sponge (Spongia officinalis, Demospongiae). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50 (2005) 301-309
37. Kawakami N., et al. Selective metal binding by Vanabin2 from the vanadium rich ascidian, Ascidia sydneiensis samea. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1760 (2006) 1096-1101
38. Seki H., and Suzuki A. A new method for the removal of toxic metal ions from acid-sensitive biomaterial. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 190 (1997) 206-211
39. Shiraishi T., et al. Recovery of cadmium from waste of scallop processing with amidoxime adsorbent synthesized by graft-polymerization. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 66 (2003) 43-47
40. Perez T., et al. Marine sponges as biomonitor of polychlorobiphenyl contamination: concentration and fate of 24 congeners. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (2003) 2152-2158
41. Perez T., et al. First evidences of surfactant biodegradation by marine sponges (Porifera): an experimental study with linear alkylbenzenesulfonate. Hydrobiologia 489 (2002) 225-233
42. Walsh K., et al. Differential bioaccumulation of heavy metals and organopollutants in the soft tissue and shell of the marine gastropod, Austrocochlea constricta. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 28 (1995) 35-39
43. National Research Council Committee on non-native oysters in the Chesapeake Bay. Non-native oysters in the Chesapeake Bay (2003), National Academies Press, Washington D.C.
44. Benkendorff K., et al. Chemical defense in the egg masses of benthic invertebrates: an assessment of antibacterial activity in 39 molluscs and 4 polychaetes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 78 (2001) 109-118
45. Mendola D. Aquaculture of three phyla of marine invertebrates to yield bioactive metabolites: process developments and economics. Biomol. Eng. 20 (2003) 441-458
46. New South Wales Animal Research Act, 1985 An act to protect the welfare of animals used in connection with animal research. (http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/download.cgi/download/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ara1985134.rtf)