Slope rotatability over all directions with correlated errors

Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry

Volumn 22, Issue 5-6, 2006, Pages 445-457

  Das, Rabindra Nath ^a   Park, Sung H ^b  

^a Department of Statistics ^*  (India)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Autocorrelated structure; Compound symmetry; Correlated errors; Inter class; Intra class; Response surface designs; Robustness; Rotatability; Slope estimation; Slope rotatability; Tri diagonal

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; ERROR ANALYSIS; PRODUCT DESIGN; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

COMPOUND SYMMETRY; ERROR STRUCTURE; SECOND-ORDER SLOPE; SLOPE ROTATABILITY;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY;

EID: 33846258830     PISSN: 15241904     EISSN: 15264025     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.655     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Box GEP, Hunter JS. Multifactor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1957; 28:195-241.
2. Myers RH, Khuri AI, Carter Jr WH. Response surface methodology: 1966-1988. Technometrics 1989; 31:137-157.
3. Box GEP, Draper RN. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. Wiley: New York. 1987.
4. Panda RN, Das RN. First order rotatable designs with correlated errors. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 1994; 44:83-101.
5. Das RN. Robust second-order rotatable designs: Part-I (RSORD). Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 1997; 47:199-214.
6. Das RN. Robust second-order rotatable designs: Part-II (RSORD). Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 1999: 49:65-76.
7. Mukhopadhyay AC, Bagchi SB, Das RN. Improvement of quality of a system using regression designs. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 2002: 53:225-233.
8. Das RN. Robust second-order rotatable designs: Part-III (RSORD). Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 2003; 56(2): 117-130.
9. Das RN. Construction and analysis of robust second order rotatable designs. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications 2004; 3(4):325-343.
10. Atkinson AC. The design of experiments to estimate the slope of a response surface. Biometrika 1970: 57:319-328.
11. Murty VN, Studden WJ. Optimal designs for estimating the slope of a polynomial regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1972; 67:869-873.
12. Ott L, Mendenhall W. Designs for estimating the slope of a second-order linear model. Technometrics 1972; 14: 341-353.
13. Myers RH, Lahoda SJ. A generalization of the response surface mean square error criterion with a specific application to the slope. Technometrics 1975; 17:481-486.
14. Hader RJ, Park SH. Slope-rotatable central composite designs. Technometrics 1978; 20:413-417.
15. Mukherjee R, Huda S. Minimax second and third order designs to estimate the slope of a response surface. Biometrika 1985; 72:173-178.
16. Park SH. A class of multifactor designs for estimating the slope of response surfaces. Technometrics 1987; 29: 449-453.
17. Kiefer J, Wynn HP. Optimum balanced block and latin square designs for correlated observations. Annals of Statistics 1981; 9:737-757.
18. Kiefer J, Wynn HP. Autocorrelation-robust design of experiments. Scientific Inference and Data Analysis and Robustness. Academic Press: New York, 1983.
19. Kiefer J, Wynn HP. Optimum and minimax exact treatment designs for one-dimensional autoregressive error processes. Annals of Statistics 1984; 12:431-449.
20. Gennings C, Chinchilli VM, Carter Jr WH. Response surface analysis with correlated data: a non-linear model approach. Journal of American Statistical Association 1989; 84:805-809.
21. Das RN. Slope rotatability with correlated errors. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 2003; 54:57-70.
22. Box GEP, Behnken EW. Simplex sum designs: a class of second-order rotatable designs derivable from those of first order. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1960; 31:838-864.