Perception of spasmodic dysphonia speech in background noise

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 629-635

  McColl, Douglas ^a   McCaffrey, Patrick ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNX DISORDER; MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECORDING; SPEECH; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TAPE RECORDING; VOICE DISORDERS;

EID: 33846258214     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PMS.103.2.629-635     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE. (1996) American National Standards specifications for audiometers. (ANSI S3.6-1969) New York: ANSI.
2. BESS, F., & HUMES, L. E. (1995) Audiology: the fundamentals. (2nd ed.) Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
3. BRADLEY, J. S. (1993) Disturbance caused by residential air-conditioner noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 1978-1986.
4. CLARK, I. E., LUBKER, J. F., & HUNNICUTT, S. (1987) Some preliminary evidence for phonetic adjustment strategies in communication difficulty. In R. Steele & T. Threadgold (Eds.), Language topics. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. Pp. 283-317.
5. DUFFY, J. (2005) Motor speech disorders. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier-Mosby.
6. HOLLEY, S., LERMAN, J., & RANDOLPH, K. (1983) A comparison of the intelligibility of esophageal, electrolarynx, and normal speech in quiet and in noise. Journal of Communication Disorders, 16, 143-155.
7. KALIKOW, D. N., STEVENS, K. N., &ELLIOTT, P. (1977) Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337-1351.
8. KOUL, R., & ALLEN, G. (1993) Segmental intelligibility and speech interference thresholds of high quality synthetic speech in the presence of noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 790-798.
9. LANE, H., &TRANEL, B. (1971) The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 677-709.
10. MCCOLL, D. (in press) Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise. Journal of Voice.
11. McCoLL, D., Fucci, D., DEAN, R., BOND, Z., LEACH, E., &MCCAFFREY, P. (1999) Role of the Lombard effect in tracheoesophageal puncture speech. American Speech-Language and Hearing Association Convention, San Francisco, California, November 18.
12. MCCOLL, D., FUCCI, D., MCCAFFREY, P., & BLACKMON, R. (2001) Atypical speech intelligibility as a function of background noise. Alaska Speech, Language, and Hearing Association Annual Convention, Anchorage, Alaska, April 6.
13. MCCOLL, D., FUCCI, D., PETROSINO, L., MARTIN, D., & MCCAFFREY, P. (1998) Listener ratings of the intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 279-289.
14. NABELEK, A. K., & NABELEK, I. V. (1994) Room acoustics and speech perception. In I. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of clinical audiology. (4th ed.) Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins. Pp. 116-153.
15. NEWBY, H. A., & POPELKA, G. R. (1992) Audiology. (6th ed.) Trenton, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. PEARSONS, K. S., BENNETT, R. L., & FIDELL, S. (1977) Speech levels in various noise environments. EPA. 600/1-77-025.
17. VON BERG, S. L., BRANCAMP, T., McCoLL, D., & VoN BERG, S. (2005) Moebius syndrome: measurements of listener comprehensibility versus intelligibility. American Speech-Language and Hearing Association Convention, San Diego, California, November 18.