Interpretation of simulations in interactive VR environments: Depth perception in CAVE and Panorama

Journal of Architectural and Planning Research

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 328-340

  Mullins, Michael ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; BUILDING; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 33846257677     PISSN: 07380895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abel C (2000) Architecture and identity: Responses to cultural and technological change, 2nd edition. Oxford: Architectural Press.
2. Barthes R (1997) Semiology and the urban. In N Leach (Ed.), Rethinking architecture. London: Routledge, pp. 166-172.
3. Bertelsen NH (2003) Erfaringer med brug af 3D visualisering i arkitektkonkurrencer: Interview of fag-og lægdommere og forslag til fremtidige målsætninger (Evaluation Report). Copenhagen: By og Byg, Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut.
4. Dave B (2001) Immersive modeling environments. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA). Buffalo, New York (October).
5. Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Granum E, Musaeus P (2002) Constructing virtual environments for visual explorers. In L Qvortrup (Ed.), Virtual space: Spatiality in virtual inhabited 3D worlds. London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 112-138.
7. Holmgren S, Rudiger B, Storgaard K, Tournay B (2004) The electronic neighbourhood: A new urban space. In H Ørbæk (Ed.), Architecture in the network society: Ecaade22. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Architecture, pp. 24-34.
8. Jensen MH, Henriksen S, Haase M, Kristiansen MB, Mogensen M, Mullins M (2004) Participation and 3D visualization tools. In G Ribeiro, S Lund, and M Mullins (Eds.), Debating participation: Actors shaping sustainable urban development. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Architecture, pp. 119-134.
9. Kjems E (in press) VR applications in an architectural competition. Case: House of Music in Aalborg. In JM Thornberg (Ed.), Arquitectura 3000. Barcelona: Khora II.
10. Mullins M, Holmgren S (2002) Improving the language of electronic dialogue in participatory projects. In T Binder, J Gregory, and I Wagner (Eds.), The Seventh Biennial Participatory Design Conference. Malmø, Sweden: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, pp. 199-203.
11. Mullins M, Strojan TZ, Juvancic M (2003) Communicating professional design intentions to the lay public on the Internet. In B Tuncer, SS Ozsariyildiz, and S Sariyildiz (Eds.), E-activities in design and design education. Paris: Europia Productions, pp. 93-102.
12. Polanyi M (1983) The tacit dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
13. Potter C, van der Merwe E (2001) Spatial ability, visual imagery and academic performance in engineering graphics. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education. Oslo, Norway (August).
14. Schnabel MA, Kvan T (2003) Spatial understanding in immersive virtual environments. International Journal of Architectural Computing 1(4):435-448.
15. Slater M, Penn A, Gillies D (2003) Seeing the world in three dimensions. http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/vr/Projects/Cave/index.htm. Site accessed September 2004.
16. Sutherland IE (1965) The ultimate display. Paper presented at the IFIPS Congress. New York City (May).
17. Wertheimer M (1985) Uber gestaltheorie. Gestalt Theory 7(2):99-120.